I am now getting the feedback I want: people USING my approach.

“This,” as I said below, “is the garden I want to make grow.”

They say that manure is the natural fertilizer.

I say a lot of good stuff, but not one reader here can deny that Bob’s Blog has provided enough h*****s**t to reawake the Sahara.

Someone asked me to repeat my e-mail address and I forgot to do so.

It’s bobw1830@yahoo.com

PeterGene can contaft me there.

PeterGene,

I just accepted the “Monitor” title on Stormfront, and Kelso was flatteringly grateful. He said my joining will get other “big names” to go in as monitors.

The idea that ***I*** give somebody some kind of respectability is a new experience for me.

But one of my active Bloggers has been banned from Stormfront.

I will be at the American Renaissance Conference later this week and I will talk to Kelso and Don Black about this. Is PeterGene your name on Stormfront?

No, don’t take your marbles and go home.

I don’t take my marbles and go home, but that is because I lost them a long time ago.

I am serious about you who take part in my seminar, so I would do this anyway and try to make peace. But in this case, it gives me an opportunity to find out exactly WHO does the banning on Stormfront and how they run it.

I know that the membership of SF took a huge jump after they got rid of one monitor who did too much banning. I like him, but when you run an organization, you have to impose impose discipline, often unfairly.

Kelso and Black get a lot of enemies that way, as did I. But if you concentrate on the abuse of power, you are NOT concentrating on the cause.

Every moment you spend concentrating on yourself is a moment you are NOT concentrating on our war.

So, PeterGene, send me your SF name at my address,
bobw1830@yahoo.com

and let me try to take it from there.

I know you are too ticked off right now to want reinstatement on SF, but I will try to make it your option.

But don’t just think about how ticked off you are. ***I*** need this opportunity to find out how SF works with a specific example. Kelso and Black know how seriously I take my Bloggers, so you can give me a real chance to ask what I need to ask.

Beautiful stuff Bob.

I like that sort of line and mentallity.

To change subject….

Well i really irritated the Jewish Masters of StromFront!

I have been Banned!

QUOTE

“Your account has been disabled for the following reason: 6 month ban – Egregiously violating every guideline & attacking Stormfront as well

Date your account will be reenabled: 08-20-2006, 12:30 AM”

UNQUOTE

Now Bob i AM proud of that! Can you understand that? I mean not the ban, but that i am proud of that.

What greater respect could they have paid me?

I love them for it!

I have been taken very seriously by THEM!

But the joke is i never took myself seriously at all!

Do you see?

Well, my victory is the correctnes of my prediction!

Few will know this!

I stood up againsts of load of Nazgool bastards. I have done so many times before.

I know it was not the politically correct thing to do Bob, but that exactly WAS MY intention.

You my despise me and hate me but you will never get a politically correct statement out of me!

You know what happens when you poke a stick into the ant’s nest?

Are you always politically correct Bob?

But 99% of the population at SF write infinitely more vile stuff than i ever wrote. Naive childish Stuff! I know because i have read it! They have written awefully stupid hateful and racist stuff such as i NEVER wrote.

For that reason i love my ban because it invalidates The Entire Stormfront Movement.

It is bereft of validity! But i would lie to you if i did not state that i knew this from the very beginning.

Were there is rot it must be exposed even it it harms oneself! That is not to say there are no good people there on StormFront who may be supported. Nor does it necessarily mean that the exposer of the rot is any good! It only means that when we find a terminal disease we have to cut deep – and yes it hurts. It hurts me too!

But i have proved the point that ALL forums are controlled by THE Jews. I have yet to find as forum that isn’t. Its scarey!

Stormfront would be shut down in an instant if it did not do servitude to the Jews!

The Jews allow it to opperate because it provides them with a counterfoil to justify their victim status. That means that certain mantras must be repeated there. Anything unusual is a danger to the Jews and also more functionally such unusualness horrifies the Dog Minded Racists who dwell at SF.

Don’t worry you won’t have to ban me from your forum.

I shall evaporite as a cloud on a Blue Spring Morn.

Respectfully

The feedback from my response to Derek on the length of Bob’s Mantra has been the garden I wish I knew how to nourish.

Derek, below, went on to state his method of dealing with this situation in actual arguments.

Tim has a terrific insight on real arguments.

There is at least one other I want to quote.

But right now, I need to make a point I have tried to make over and over and over: But I am tired and I won’t be here forever

I have spent a lot of time lately in the antis section of Stormfront. I demonstrate, again and again and again, that my points leave the antis gibbering.

That is the ONLY point of dealing with the opposition.

We have a war to fight. We have a point to make. Lately, by concentrating on the anti thread, I have begun to get my comrades into backing me up. But if I disappear, they will be back to arguing details.

Here Derek’s comment sparked a discussion of how YOU can use my points, how YOU can “stay on message.” I got some feedback from some of you who actually can give me pointers from ACTUAL USE of my points.

Derek explains here that he has to get in all in in segments. But the point is that he is finding a way to get it in.

THAT is what I am here for.

Derek, I can usually say something like, “Are we going to have a discussion or are you just going to go to pieces on me?” If the other person is not a hopeless nut, I can buy enough time to state Bob’s Mantra, completely. The, as Tim says, I simply will not get off it.

But always remember, I am not offering you a Wordism. I am not giving you a cookbook.

You have to do what Tim and Derek are doing, develope the approach that gives YOU the most yield.

And for God’s sake, PLEASE share your experiences with the rest of us here.

Once you get m y approach down, you are going to feel sorry for Ole Bob. YOU are going to spread this approach, and YOU are going to sigh with exasperation as YOUR pupils constantly veer back to the old stuff:

“The dog returns to its vomit, the pig returns to its mire, and the burnt fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the fire.”

Once you start backing them down and convincing people, you will the horrible frustration at others who simply cannot seem to understand the basics. All good teachers suffer that all the time.

But I am, slowly, making progress.

This is a seminar, not a lecture. You have outgrown your college education, even if you never had one.

I expect a lot of you.

I expect you to save my race.

Comment by TIM

The reason it is so effective is BECAUSE it is NOT short. If it were short no one would think about it. It forces folks to think about uncomfortable things. And dispossesion is very uncomfortable. If you start using the “BW lines”. You will find that people TRY to get off the subject. And that is the ultimate compliment! When a liberal tries to get off the subject —you have won. At first, I did not know what to do when someone immediately tries to get off the subject. Now it is like blood in the water for a shark. I just dig in and keep at them until I see fear and tears. I have seen it change people. You have to remember though. To go from reverse to drive —you first have to go throgh neutral. People always try to convince others. I have learned at a young age–that is a waste of my time. I am just a parot. We are pre revolution and Bob’s mantra is my revolutionary slogan. I just keep repeating it. In pre-revolution people look to those who are bold and show courage. Bob’s lines incorporates both these traits.

Comment by Derek

When talking with others about this issue so many get upset and angry that they won’t let you get in a word edgewise. I usually have to break it up and address it in different sections when someone brings up a point.

For instance: person A says to me “there is a race problem in America.”

I say “and in Europe and all white countries. Notice how there are no race problems in Asian countries. The race problem is the ‘white problem’ and it won’t be solved until we are bred out of existance.”

A:”But this means you are a racist. I am anti-racist.”

Me: “Anti-racist is a code for anti-white.”, etc, etc.

I guess my basic point is that if you can’t get it all out at once try and get as much out as you can, even in fragments. The more the better, but some is better than none. At least that is my opinion.