Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Incident at the AR Convention

Posted by Bob on March 5th, 2006 under How Things Work


There was a very, very VERY Jewish-looking couple at the AR convention.

American Renaissance has a more repsectable program, so they endorsed far too much of the neo-con agenda. So David Duke objected and argued with the Jew, who called him a Nazi.

I was not at that meeting.

But I had had a friendly conversation with the two Jews before and after it.

Now David was very worried about the confrontation he had caused. After all, it was Jared Taylor’s convention and Sam Dickson was also critical of him.

Contrary to what you might think, David Duke is not noted for being a shy and retiring person. To be perfectly frank, David has caused some controversy in the past.

So here I was in the unique position of trying to reassure David Duke that he had not done wrong in speaking out.

After all these decades in this fight, you must excuse Ole Bob. I have stayed out of the loony bin only by seeing the humor in things.

I was thinking, “In all the world, I am one of the very, very few people who has had to reassure David Duke about starting a ruckus.”

I told David that I had talked to the two Jews before and after the meeting and we got along just fine.

Normally David would be suspicious of someone who had a couple of friendly talks with Jews who were obviously there to push their own agenda. But in my case, he just asked, “So what did you talk about?”

Which was a hell of a compliment.

It never occurred to David that I would be doing anything but representing US. Despite all the times he has been sold out by others, he knows damned well where I stand.

David also knows I am a political pro. I can talk to anybody on a frank and friendly basis.

When Dr. Duke asked me how the talks went, I told him I would write down how the conversation went.

So, David, here it is:

At the beginning of the convention, I walked up and started talking to that couple. The man excused himself.

I started talking to the Jewish wife and she went right into her routine. She talked about the guilt of whites in making slaves of blacks. I said, “No white man ever made a slave of a black.”

She then jumped in and said she knew, black slaves were sold to us by blacks.

End of round one.

I then repeated Bob’s Mantra:

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

She agreed. They were there to agree with us and to change our agenda, just as David said.

But now give Ole Bob the privilege of saying the Unsayable. They were there there to warp our agenda.

But they were THERE. They were not outside shrieking insults at a safe distance. For them to be THERE was like George Lincoln Rockwell when he went right into the Black Muslim convention and spoke.

I know the man looked so Jewish he could have starred in a Nazi propaganda film. But he was THERE, and I respect cajones.

After the meeting where David made his objections I met with the Jewish couple again. I didn’t know about the confrontation.

I marched up to her and she started talking about the Holocaust. I told her about my e-mail exchanges with Colmes of Hannity and Colmes. I had met Colmes and he corresponded with me, as liberals tend to, briefly.

Colmes is a Jew.

Colmes and Billy Graham Junior had agreed that Mel Gibson had been anti-semitic when he got tired of being called anti-semitic and mentioned that Stalin’s starvation of millions of Ukrainian kulaks was as bad as anything Hitler did.

Colmes said to me that this was one more instance of “trivializing the Holocaust.”

In what turned out to be my last exchange with Colmes, I asked him what was so trivial about Ukrainians. He did not reply.

That happens to me a lot.

Back to my conversation with the Jewess. I quoted Henry Kissinger: “Any group that has been persecuted for two thousand years is doing something WRONG.”

I reminded her that the Jewish attempt to get revenge on white gentiles by flooding white gentile Europe with third worlders had resulted in a growing population in Europe that hates Jews more than Hitler did.

I was not being hostile. I was telling her that Jews were being stupid. I pointed out that the degenerate form of Christianity these days was just self-hatred and Judaism had degenerated into self-pity.

Her husband came up and shook hands with me, firmly and probably sincerely.

I don’t know.

That’s not my concern.

My attitude towards Jews has nothing to do with World Conspiracies. I do not think we should allow Jews, homosexuals, or anybody else with separate loyalties into our inner councils.

And I told them so.

More than once some minority militants have astonished people by saying something like, “We want to talk to Whitaker. He’s a white man.”

So maybe the Jew’s handshake was genuine. If he ever wants to bargain, maybe he would rather bargain with me.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by kanefromsf on 03/05/2006 - 8:24 pm

    I can respect you for sticking to your opinions, but from what I see on the Amren blog, at least 75% of the people are siding with Hart over Duke. I don’t hold anything against Duke, I even listen to his radio show. But say someone of the Amren mentality went to the European American Conference and challanged Duke on this Jewish Question. They wouldn’t be very appreciated. The same thing is true in reverse. I appreciate your work but believe we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one.

  2. #2 by Tim on 03/05/2006 - 10:47 pm

    I agree with your approach. I did something similar with an Orthodox Rabii. He told me that if the only jews he knew were the ADL type —he would personally be a Nazi! (yes he did say Nazi) He also stated that the growing number of conservative jews are sick of the liberal whiney jews going out of their way to hurt white gentiles. He stated it was killing HIS children. He listens to the Jewish Task Force. I have since listened to the JTF audios which are live on New York television! I was blown away. They are as right wing as anything in the country and I cannot believe they are on the tv in New York. There are plenty of jews that ticked off. As you stated Mr Whitaker:” Jews are not angels or devils —they are human beings —you can have good ones and bad ones”.

    http://www.jtf.org/

    (In france there is a Jewish boy named Sarkozy coming to power. Many folks thinks he is just a Neocon. I know he was a Neocon. He was talking about giving the Mooslims affirmative action etc. But since so many Jews have been attacked (and some have been murdered). I have seen a more radical sound in his rhetoric and the actions he has taken. Not to mention deportation plans. It should be interesting to see how far he goes in the action department and just how radical to the right wing the Jews of France go. I would NOT be surprised to see the French jews from both the right and left mouth platitudes and then take some wild action that surprises everyone. They cannot be liberal and survive anywhere but a WHITE liberal society.)

  3. #3 by kanefromsf on 03/06/2006 - 1:18 am

    I see the topic of Jews and their acceptance has come up here. Here’s what I think…there isn’t one movement or “an inner circle,” there are a lot of movements, but, I generally associate with white Chritians and probably would only associate with white Christians (no Jews, Muslims, Atheists, Odinists, or Pagans). You are either white or you are not, and being Jewish doesn’t determine that, it depends on the Jew. Frankly, some people who are Jewish are white and ethnically Europeon. Others are not. And something like Amren is desgined for all Americans who are white, so I think it should stay the way it is. If I made my own group it would be white Christians.

    I am pro-white, pro-Christian, anti-zionist. There is no inner circle. There are a lot of different movements.

  4. #4 by LibAnon on 03/06/2006 - 2:28 am

    “So maybe the Jew’s handshake was genuine. If he ever wants to bargain, maybe he would rather bargain with me.”
    The vanity revealed by this statement might attract a Jew, but not the racial pride. Although there have been Jewish fascists since Mussolini and they’re running Israel today, I doubt that any one of them truly understands racial pride. Pomp, brutality, conquest and doctrines of superiority, yes, but never the quiet joy of shaking hands with an equal.

  5. #5 by Derek on 03/06/2006 - 2:48 pm

    I have the same type of ability. When I was in the service everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, knew that I was a ‘racist’. This actually made it easier to get along with everyone. I was fairly frank about it seeing as the service opened my eyes to what the truth really was.

    I was always hanging out at the gym, playing basketball, with the black guys. My friend from Tennesse would always ask why or how I could get along with them. I told him it was because I was honest about it and that I was confident within myself to stand by my convictions.

    Maybe that is what we need more than any wordism or political pandering: the conviction to know what is right and to do something about it.

  6. #6 by Peter on 03/06/2006 - 9:52 pm

    The AmRen Blog is gently censored. One cannot tell from the responses exactly how many approve or disapprove. On the one hand 25% is remarkably supportive for Duke. Further, the Jew’s screaming of profanities was completely inappropriate and will backfire. Best of all, Duke’s vague question prompted an answer from official speakers who were getting their answers cleared by Taylor as they went.

    That means that their admission that Jews were something of a problem had Taylor’s stamp of approval.

  7. #7 by dad of six on 03/06/2006 - 11:16 pm

    “Normally David would be suspicious of someone who had a couple of friendly talks with Jews who were obviously there to push their own agenda. But in my case, he just asked, “So what did you talk about?”

    Which was a hell of a compliment.”

    This was the heart of the story. You have the complete and total respect of Dr. Duke. I’m sure that does not come easy with Dr. Duke. If we had 100 of you, our race would be in much better shape.

You must be logged in to post a comment.