Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Replies on American Renaissance

Posted by Bob on March 13th, 2006 under Comment Responses


Derek said he was stumped, too, which makes me feel better.

Here were the other Bob’s Blogger replies:

kanefromsf :

I guess the answer seems pretty simple to me. It’s a publication which talks about racial issues effecting white people and while allowing anti-zionism to some extent, does not exclude Jews from attending its conference or speaking there and does not claim that someone cannot be an x-jew.

LibAnon:

“So I ask my readers: What IS AR?”
Reminds me of a time I saw Frank Sinatra on TV. He was singing Cole Porter’s tune “What Is This Thing Called Love?”
Dean Martin, standing next to him, said “Man, if YOU don’t know, we’re all in trouble!”

Antonio Fini :

According to ADL Bob, Amren is an intellectualized pseudoscientific White supremecy group that avoids anit-semitism.

I was releived to find Amren is not a hate group like National Vanguard, Stormfront, National Alliance, etc.

Now I’m sorry I didn’t go to the conference.

MY RESPONSE:

My problem was that I asked at least twenty people at the AR convention “What IS American Renaissance?” and I couldn’t get a straight answer.

You KNOW how I am about straight answers.

I called Kelso and he told me AR had a Mission Statement, and a good one. But no one at the convention seemed to know about it.

Kelso told me that the Mission Statement by Jared Taylor says that AR is dedicated to answering the question, “Can’t we all get along?” and answers it with “No.”

That’s my kind of language.

Thay are not that interested in Jews, which suits me.

On the one hand, Stormfront is obsessed with Jews and the latest news. On the other hand, I am worried about AR’s attitude only in that even pro-white Jews have a separate loyalty from white survival, which is my ONLY interest.

I have a similar problem with the Council of Conservative Citizens. What I SAW at their conventions was a long list of preachers. What I saw was a group trying to justify the existence of our race IN TERMS OF Christianity, Traditional Values, and hard-right conservatism.

This is a war, and I welcome anybody who is shooting at my enemies.

But I have learned from costly experience that there is a cleavage between allies, those hwo are shooting in the same direction, and comrades, those you can always trust not to shoot you in the back.

When the Confederate flag issue came up, Bob Jones the Fifth or Sixth, inheritor of the family business, grabbed his Bible, found some quotes, and shot us in the back.

On interracial dating, he did much the same thing.

A Jew who is on our side either 1) genuinely hates Jews or 2) may feel his people are threatened by something we say and shoot us in the back.

I would not consider anyone who genuinely hates his own people to be a comrade, and so we are left with the fact that a person who has a separate Jewish loyalty can make an ally but NEVER a comrade. So I worry about AR putting them in its central councils or toadying to them.

I worry about the CCC suddenly switching sides on us when convenient the way Bob Jones the Umpteenth did. I have seen it happen with self-styled “Christians” many, many times.

AR’s Mission Statement, from what Kelso told me, is right on the money.

But, and there is always a but, they need to limit their COMRADES to those who are for white survival without any other justification, without loyalty that could override it.

AR must rigidly follow its own Mission Statement.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by kanefromsf on 03/13/2006 - 3:23 pm

    I’m seriously looking into the ccc. But I basically have Buchananite principles. That’s America first. And I don’t like this global warfare, and I hope the ccc doesn’t embrace it.

  2. #2 by LibAnon on 03/13/2006 - 4:13 pm

    “AR must rigidly follow its own Mission Statement.”
    I agree. Any organization with Jewish “comrades” is a Jewish organization.
    In my opinion, understanding this clearly is as “anti-Semitic” as we need to get.

  3. #3 by kanefromsf on 03/13/2006 - 10:46 pm

    I think an important thing though is that Jared Taylor is a very principled man, and he’s the man at the top. No person with dual loyalties is at the top of that organization. I also think its important that its AMERICAN Renaissance. It’s not Israel Renaissance. Even the Nathan Forrest KKK not only considered Jews to be a religion, but actually had them in it. But I don’t think they were dominating it and calling the shots. And I think Amren will be the same way. It’s still a white Christian organization, in terms of who calls the shots. Also, Amren can’t be infiltrated, because you can’t be a member unless you speak, you can only attend conferences and buy its magazine (the main thing). But you still aren’t a member in that case. So while I see your concern, I guess I think everything will be fine. Jared Taylor is the dicatator.

  4. #4 by kanefromsf on 03/24/2006 - 9:24 pm

    I guess I think of it like this: If I had to choose between a jew who respected white christian civilization and a gentile who didn’t, I would choose the jew who did.

You must be logged in to post a comment.