Well, I can’t find it, but I just approved a comment by a new commenter who said he was all for us but the white race would only be saved by violence. He didn’t way he wanted it, just that it would come.

He must be young, because young people still believe in an inevitable future. This is the sixth decade since I began hearing predictions of the Inevitable Future, and the Inevitable Future has been different in each one.

I have mentioned before that every 1930s movie had a way of depicting the Past and the Future. The Past was the cave man days, when everybody was half-naked in animal skins and dirt and uncombed hair. The Future was everybody in the a uniform that was tight-fitting and had the same metallic ridges on the shoulders and everybody’s hair was carefully combed.

Or they had on a helmet with that same metallic ridge on it.

And when the hat was taken off, the hair under it was carefully combed.

Uncombed and dirty, the Past, combed and styled, the Future.

When John McCane was asked about interraical dating he replied, “This is the twenty-first century.” In earlier ages, if asked about n established doctrine, one would reply, “It is God’s Word.”

It’s the same thing.

The established religion tells us what is and ever will be. Today the established religion is Progressivism, which means Polticial Correctness.

So someone who wants to move more quickly towards the inevitable future is called a “Progressive.” If you use the term “Progressive” you have to be sure you know where we are going and how to “progress” toward it.

In the 1950s state ownership of hte means of production and distribution was admitted by both the left and right in the political and academic communities as “inevitable.” The price system would give way to a command economy. The right thought it was bad and the left thought it was good, but both agreed it was coming.

So progressivism was for it.

With the collapse of the USSR, old-style Communists were declared to be political rightists and reactionaries. Progressives now deny they ever advocated a command economy.

Progressives are caught in the same trap the Papacy is. The Pope cannot simply declare that one of his predecessors was just plain wrong. Galileo’s ideas are now taught in every Catholic school, but he himself is still under indictment by the Church. For fifteen hundred years after Palgius was declared a heretic for disagreeing with St. Augustine that unbaptized babies were damned, Pelagius is still a heretic, but the Churh is backing furiously away from its pronouncement on this subject and no Catholic will claim what the Church stated officially for a millennium and a half.

So the Galbraiths and Schlessingers who got awards for proclaiming that the price system was useless are still honored and NEVER quoted.

In the established relgiion of Political Correctness, a Progressive can never be just plain wrong, just as the old established religions could not admit that the Pope or the Bible was just plain wrong.