I am driving up to Charlotte today to do a TV interview.
In talking to the reporter, it hit me that today we do not have a repeat of the sixties, this is the sixties all over again.
Public opinion is overwhelmingly in favor of at least tightening the borders. Nobody denies that. So the marches in the news, gigantic, titanic mearches, are in favor of opening the borers.
That is EXACTLY the way it was inthe 1960s.
Everybody is terrified that if they object to open borders, they will be accused of being naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.
That is exactly the way it was in the sixties.
Nobody DARES stage a counterdemonstration because the mefdia are always shouting about racism, but the real thugs, as everybody knows, are on the “anti-racist” side.
The sixties again.
The campus bombers were all on the left back then. Any objector to anything labeled “civil rights” was in physical danger. Speakers who did not toe the politically correct line were driven off of campuses and off of the streets. But all the media talked about was the Klan and the Nazis and the Holocaust and dangers of racism.
Which is the 1960s again.
The thugs and the illegals get a free pass from the press. They are heroes.
Even Columbia’s slavishly liberal chain-owned newspaper had a weak dissent. A cartoon showed a typical committee chairman in Washington saying, “We can’t round up millions of illegal aliens. We can’t even FIND the.”
Meanwhile one member of the committee was looking out of the window at thousands of illegal aliens marching with signs.
So we can either worry about dead dictators or live issues.
#1 by kanefromsf on 04/11/2006 - 11:49 am
Tom Delay, despite all the negative things that could be said about him, actually did say one thing I agree with, that if you get rid of the jobs that are being offered to them, putting them back will be a lot easier. George Allen seems to have a solid stance on the issue also. But it doesn’t really matter. Republicans are the party of big business. Democrats are the party of blame whitey. So either way, with these two parties, unless they violate the party line, we will never get anything done.
#2 by Simmons on 04/11/2006 - 12:23 pm
It seems to me that our next “leader” will be the first man or woman
to actually stand up to the wordists and their word “racism (ist).”
To me it seems a ripe opportunity for someone politically ambitious
enough and wise enough to make a campaign promise of liberation
from the oppression of our new dictators, the high priests of PC.
#3 by Mark on 04/11/2006 - 8:46 pm
“Nobody DARES stage a counterdemonstration because the mefdia are always shouting about racism, but the real thugs, as everybody knows, are on the “anti-racist” side.”
Bob, can you explain why the nutty anti-whites and marxist left-wingers have courage enough to organize marches while we in the pro-white movement seem cemented to our chairs? Is cowardice a genetic trait or a learned behavior? I’m serious in my question, btw.
#4 by Elizabeth on 04/12/2006 - 1:52 pm
Unfortunately, ’70s clothes and ’70s hair are back.
#5 by Bob on 04/12/2006 - 4:03 pm
Elizabeth,
Men with tight bell bottoms and blow-dried hair.
I called it The Pimp Look.
#6 by Peter on 04/15/2006 - 10:38 pm
Who has time to blow his hair? I’m glad that the tossled look is in now. It’s about time that high fashion followed the trend I’ve set since I was seven when I refused my mother’s spit in my hair.
Just as women burned their bras, I’m burning my combs.
It’s about time.