Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The Code Used in the Da Vinci Code

Posted by Bob on April 20th, 2006 under How Things Work


In the 1950s, the code word for pro-Communist was Peace. One Commuist got on TV and attacked people for attacking those Communist Party members. He never used the word Communist. He referred repeatedly to those who were being attacked as “working for peace.”

An item below noted the quiet demise of an idea that was absolutely required doctrine in the 1950s, that atomic weapons caused genetic mutations. It was a theme of science fiction, and good old lefty Gregory Peck showed up in a movie, “On the Beach” showing the end of the world.

The theme of hte movie was a poster at a church at the end of the film at a church:

“It’s not too late, brother!”

Meaning that it was time we accepted Communists as partners before The Bomb ended the world.

And “civil rights” means anti-racism which means the end of the white race:

” Liberals and respectable cosnervatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

These are two popular code words, Peace and Anti-Racism.

In the DaVinci Code there is another code.

One thing no one dares question is the fundamental tenant of Christianity that sterility is ideal. But that ideal of sterility cannot be questioned because it is also the basis of a Christian culture endorsement of the idea that a good white is a white who is committed the higher morality of whites breeding out of existence.

But there remains the fundamental puzzle of how the hell we mangaed to get the idea that chastity was an ideal, and chastity unto sterility was the main ideal?

Well, the way you get the question away from where the hell this sterility ideal came from is to talk about how it was actually a Women’s Lib issue. So it isn’t sterility that is at issue, because sterility — aka, perect chastity — is at the basis of both Christian and liberal ideas. The only issue is the persecution of women.

Which is what the DaVince Code talks about. How the HELL did we get to this rejection of women that is so fundamental to the thinking of Saint Paul and the early church?

It certainly has nothing to do with the Old Testament.

The Da Vinci Code did touch on the fact that a Jewish father who did not find his son a wife by age thirty had a LOT of explaining to do, and no such explanation about Jresus is in the New Testament. No one who insists Jesus was a good Jew and circumcision and Israel are both holy ever asks this question AT ALL.

The Protestants are as desperate to avoid this question as are the Catholic who require unmarried priests.

No one dares to question the Ideal of Sterility.

So the DaVinci Code talks about how women were persecuted, the male conspriacy against women. It does not question The Ideal of Sterility. The DaVinci Code naturally had to use the code tgerm, women’s lib.

That is the code the Da VinciCode uses.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by kane on 04/21/2006 - 12:22 am

    Communists talk of peace but once they get in power, the first thing they do is start using the death penalty at amazingly high rates and fighting to expand communism. They talk about the working class, but then they enslave it. CPUSA is talking about third worlders “rights” in America. Funny thing, as soon as they get in power, the first thing that would go up is a border, to keep Americans IN!

    I love your classic argument, but the more I think about the more I think we do it to ourselves, it isn’t some plot. Protectionist policy is a key to racial integrity.

  2. #2 by Mark on 04/21/2006 - 10:40 am

    Bob, you know me as a staunch agnostic who scoffs at anything deemed religous, and that of course applies to the Catholic Church. But how does the fact that the Catholic Church has made it a sin to use birth control jive with your theory of sterilizing the white world? Wouldn’t that seem to make the Catholics in favor of increasing their white followers? I know you could say that as a practicality it only applies to the brown races since they are more gullable than whites, but the last time I went to Mass (which was a LONG time ago) the priests were still railing against the use of birth control.

  3. #3 by Shari on 04/21/2006 - 1:48 pm

    Help! I have no idea what you are getting at. It seems to me that a steril ideal is a pretty current thing. I have a Catholic aunt who had 10 children in the 1950’s and early 60’s. Lots of families in my home town had several children, although mine wasn’t one of them. I hope that,perhaps Elizabeth can comment on this. Or that you have something further to say! By the way, I think that chastity is the ideal for the young and never married. But then I also think that marriage is put off for a ridiculously long time now.

  4. #4 by Elizabeth on 04/21/2006 - 2:00 pm

    Until about World War I, the maternal death toll was around 50%. Most women who
    were not wealthy or likely to be saw opportunity in any situation where
    they could get an education, have a roof over their heads, and have
    responsibility. Most of these opportunities were in Catholic institutions,
    especially Catholic schools and hospitals.

    Also, up until around 1920, women were legally property — if they were married —
    unless they legally declared themselves free of male control (“femme sole”)
    or had wealthy relatives who would ensure their legal autonomy.

    The Catholic church in the West (Roman Rite/Latin Rite) has only consistently
    enforced celibacy in the secular clergy since the late 1500s. Secular Catholic
    clergy in other rites were usually allowed to marry. Clerical celibacy
    meant that priests and bishops wouldn’t be able to transmit Church property
    to their kids — and that they’d have more time to do their jobs. (This
    was before men were encouraged to work such long hours that they would not
    see their young children awake most of the week.)

    I’d love to be married and have a family, but I’ve never been deluged
    with proposals.

  5. #5 by LibAnon on 04/21/2006 - 5:59 pm

    “it isn’t some plot”
    You say this over and over, Kane, and I’m beginning to wonder why.
    Kevin MacDonald and David Duke have published approximately 800 footnoted pages between them showing that there is indeed an organized political effort to eliminate all white political majorities on Earth, and that this effort has been led by Jews. We’re “doing it to ourselves” only to the extent that many whites, like yourself, refuse to recognize this fact.
    If Messrs. MacDonald and Duke are wrong, please be constructive and provide some arguments, as well-documented as theirs, that prove it.

  6. #6 by Shari on 04/21/2006 - 9:15 pm

    Elizabeth’s comments give me an idea why “chastity unto sterility” might be made to seem ideal. It was a way to cope with the effects of the fall of man. Christianity is the only religion that places women on an equal plane as men. But of course it doesn’t turn them into men or take away their childbearing priviledge, which is also their vulnerability. I suppose many if not most women would love to have a number of children,[perhaps less than 10 or 12, but more than 1or2] if things weren’t so out of kilter and they weren’t brainwashed. Women’s lib is code for anti woman.

You must be logged in to post a comment.