Archive for April 21st, 2006

Repeat: The Code Behind the Da Vinci Code

In the 1950s, the code word for pro-Communist was Peace. One Commuist got on TV and attacked people for attacking those Communist Party members. He never used the word Communist. He referred repeatedly to those who were being attacked as “working for peace.”

An item below noted the quiet demise of an idea that was absolutely required doctrine in the 1950s, that atomic weapons caused genetic mutations. It was a theme of science fiction, and good old lefty Gregory Peck showed up in a movie, “On the Beach” showing the end of the world.

The theme of hte movie was a poster at a church at the end of the film at a church:

“It’s not too late, brother!”

Meaning that it was time we accepted Communists as partners before The Bomb ended the world.

And “civil rights” means anti-racism which means the end of the white race:

” Liberals and respectable cosnervatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

These are two popular code words, Peace and Anti-Racism.

In the DaVinci Code there is another code.

One thing no one dares question is the fundamental tenant of Christianity that sterility is ideal. But that ideal of sterility cannot be questioned because it is also the basis of a Christian culture endorsement of the idea that a good white is a white who is committed the higher morality of whites breeding out of existence.

But there remains the fundamental puzzle of how the hell we mangaed to get the idea that chastity was an ideal, and chastity unto sterility was the main ideal?

Well, the way you get the question away from where the hell this sterility ideal came from is to talk about how it was actually a Women’s Lib issue. So it isn’t sterility that is at issue, because sterility — aka, perect chastity — is at the basis of both Christian and liberal ideas. The only issue is the persecution of women.

Which is what the DaVince Code talks about. How the HELL did we get to this rejection of women that is so fundamental to the thinking of Saint Paul and the early church?

It certainly has nothing to do with the Old Testament.

The Da Vinci Code did touch on the fact that a Jewish father who did not find his son a wife by age thirty had a LOT of explaining to do, and no such explanation about Jresus is in the New Testament. No one who insists Jesus was a good Jew and circumcision and Israel are both holy ever asks this question AT ALL.

The Protestants are as desperate to avoid this question as are the Catholic who require unmarried priests.

No one dares to question the Ideal of Sterility.

So the DaVinci Code talks about how women were persecuted, the male conspiracy against women. It does not question The Ideal of Sterility. The DaVinci Code naturally had to use the code term, women’s lib.

That is the code the Da Vinci Code uses.


1 Comment

Mark is not Peter

Mark points out:

“Neither Peter nor Shari nor Elizabeth is trying to make points on me. You should give me credit for knowing that.”

I would give you credit if you would remember my name is Mark, NOT Peter — altho I have an abundance of respect for Peter and his intellect.

I’m MARK. I’m from Missouri. I’m agnostic.
I’m Mark. I’m from Missouri. I’m agnostic.
I’m Mark. I”m from Missouri. I’m agnostic.

Okay, any questions?

Comment by Mark


OK, Senile Bob has tried to change each reference to yo so that I use your name.

In one case I used your name instead of Shari’s, and I changed that, too.

If I missed any, my address is

Repetition works.

So I am going to repeat the orginial article and see if we can get off of the Catholic Church this time.


No Comments

Stormfront Comment on Good Ole Boys


Good ol’ boys are direct.

On the other hand, I find that I can make complex intellectual points with them that they have no trouble with at all.

A real Southern girl tends to be the same way. New York Jews would say they are “dumb blonds.”

With “sophisticated” city types you have to go through all the verbiage to prove you are “with it” just like they are.

With good ole boys you have to make sense.

A Southern girls is a throwback to the women who built our civilization.

She isn’t trying to prove anything. She lets you make a fool of yourself without embarrassing you.

She isn’t in competition with you.

She is a woman. It never occurs to her that she is supposed to be a superMAN.

While the Modern Girl is trying to prove she is “just as good” as a man, the Southern girl is watching you like a hawk. She has her own goals, and she is judging whether you can meet them.

The good ole boy doesn’t give a damn what the latest impressive kind of thinking is. But he can take your car apart and put it back together while the New Yorker is bragging about he gave that mechanic hell.

A lot of people wonder why I talk about being redneck.

It has little to do with rednecks. The only reason I claim the title is because “redneck” today is a just a label for any white man who has cajones.

I call myself a redneck because it the very word every New York Jew distances himself from. And the more distance I can put between them and me the happier Ole Bob will be.

Originally Posted by Art of Balance
Aw, what’s to make fun of? Good ol’ boys are simple, direct, and unassuming. What you see is what you get. I think you’re darling.

And, if country songs have any basis in reality, not only are country boys butt-kickers, but they’re sensitive die-hard romantics, not afraid to work hard with their bare hands, and really know how to party!

How does that profile fit you, Stormtrooper?



1 Comment

Professorial Bullies

I am not nice to you.

That is, I try to show common courtesy, but my first priority is to make the point.

PLEASE don’t confuse that with bully professors.

In Love Story, the Law Professor at Harvard would emabrrass and insult students, and that was supposed to make him some kind of heroic true intellectual.

It was part of a New York City-oriented book. The theme was heart-wrenching, but it had to cinlude gutter language, none of which was necessary and none of which fited with the old-fashioned love and tragedy being presented.

And the girl’s father was a Harvard professor who fitted the New York City ideal. He insulted students. Being trashy and just plain mean is hte New York City idea of “honesty.”

Having been a professor, I know that there is nothing easier than to intimidate students. Their whole career depends on how you grade them. They are young people who will depend on your word about htem to other professors and to prospective employers.

A professor of economics has no trouble intimidating students in an economics class. They have four other courses they are taking and they are always afraid you will hit them with some of the material they don’t remember. The heroic professor in Love Story acted as if they should have everything on hand.

Besides that, if their interpretation was different from his, he could depend on a lifetime of study in his field to make them look ridiculous.

And somebody who is a professional unarmed combat instructor in the army can beat the hell out of you.

So bleeding WHAT?

A couple of the kindof people who make me want to vomit, South Carolina liberals, were braggingonthe courage of one history professor who insulted the South in a lecture years ago when a young man in his class said, “You are insulting my ancestors.”

The professor said, “Yes, I am insulting your ancestors and I plan to go on doing it.”

These nauseating Southern liberals were amazed at how brave he was.

I told them I had beena professor and that nothiing was easier than insulting students from the lectern.

What could they do about it?

The young man couldn’t beat hell out of the old professor. He would have been ruined if he had.

That brave professor would have been the first to sue him and destroy him for it.

It happened that, as a young student, I couldn’t get that very professor to debate me. He wouldn’t fight it out outside the lectern.

I told those two vomit-makers that, if they wanted to insult me, I would be happy to take them outside.

THAT, I said, would show guts. Neither had any interest in such a display of courage.

I HATE bullies.

I was in a white trash school from the first grade to the ninth, and I HATE bullies.

The fact that a bully is violent trash is no diffferent from a bully with a PhD.

Well, there is one difference. If you take on the white trash he doesn’t go crying to the authorities. He fights his own fights.

I play rough.

But if you think I’m turning bully, do like LibAnon and say so.



What Warms Bob’s Black Little Heart

Someone pointed out that they had had to deal with “Mommy Professor’s pet revolutionaries.”

That was hard life experience, and I think the person who said it was very satisfied that I had put those bastards in their place. He now has a means to put them in their place in short order.

That was an accomplishment that makes all my intellectual effort worth while.

It is the passing remarks like this that make all the difference.

People hit “Wordism.” Often I correct them.

But what is important is that are USING my concepts, even to correct me. Arguing with me about my own concepts is the essence of a good seminar.

If what I have to say is worth while, it will come up in your discussion.

Ther is the minor little point that I have spent my whole life developing a way of thinking, and you might be able to forgive me if, at the age of 65, I watch very carefully to see if the only people I am writing for absord my approach or go off into their usual channels of thought unaffected by it.

The reason I repeated my criticism of three critics was not to worry about some “GOTCHA!” It was a marvelous opportunity to reenforce the whole point I am making here.

By now you know that I use repetition for this purpose.

There is a piece in this Blog that is called “Repetition.”

I think I’ll repeat it.

As for whether this repetition will ruin the lives of Peter and Shari and Elizabeth, I think they are used to the fact Bob’s Blog is not an exercise in diplomacy.

As I told Stormfront, Bob’s Blog commenters are not delicate.

And I’m proud of that.


No Comments