Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Conservative? ME?

Posted by Bob on May 5th, 2006 under Coaching Session


— Conservative? ME?

When the Soviet Union was falling the hard-line Communists were given a new name: conservatives.

Just two years before the media had recoiled in horror when Reagan called these same people “The Evil Empire.” They had praised Comrade Stalin and all the Peace-Loving Peoples’ Republics ever since.

Then, as the old liners were losing power under Gorbaczev, the Peace-Loving Progressives were suddenly “reactionaries and “rightists.” They were the bad guys, so they were “right-wing.”

In our age anyone who opposes Political Correctness is called some kind of “rightist.” No matter how radical a person is, if his radicalism is not of the sort prescribed by our established religion, he is a “conservative.”

Too many people who strive to overthrow our established religion, with its program of genocide against white people, are not aware that they have subconsciously subscribed to this doctrine. The seek a restoration of a time before Political Correctness took over in the name of liberalism and leftism. They seek to restore what was.

So when I speak of the future as it will be, my comrades are often as horrified as my enemies. There is a great parting of the ways between their world view and mine.

They ask me why I am so optimistic, and I hesitate to tell them, because the reasons I am optimistic about the things that matter, the survival of my race and our journey to the stars, is based on my acceptance of things that would horrify them. They see a restoration of their old world, where Traditional Values were accepted by all but the outlaws of society.

I see a world divided forever, where some will have a place to be in world of their traditional values and others will have their children by choosing their genes, and those who are traditional will be more and more like the Amish coach-drivers of Pennsylvania who reject all modern conveniences and are wholly unaware that those conveniences are right there in the buggies they drive.

The Amish claim only to use Biblical technology, but they would be horrified if they had to drive the banging, springless conveyances used in Biblical times.

Several of the congressmen who fight all uses of embryos for medical purposes have products of those embryos keeping them alive.

The Indians who sob over how their wonderful Way of Life was destroyed would not survive a year in one of that Way of life, and it would be an awful year. The clouds of gnats in their children’s eyes, which you never see on television depictures of the Noble Red Man, would have horrified them.

I lived in that world of outhouses and back-breaking work, and I remember nothing charming about it. And the way I lived was beyond the dreams of early Americans or Africans today or yesterday.

Which may be why I am such a radical. I have met many a suburban young person, entranced by Mommy Professor’s description of the glories of Native Cultures, drink his beer and denounce all technology. But I have never seen a coal miner do that.

Real workers do not miss the days of digging with their shovels with candles in their hats, and they are close enough to the past to realize what the real Good Old Days were like.

Every professor will tell you how happy Africans were before the Evil White man came, but no African wants to return to those ways. A lot of them are now having to return to those ways, and they are dying and miserable.

I was watching a Canadian documentary with old pictures of Inuit (Eskimo) life. But below the pictures a caption was repeated and repeated, (No one lives like this now”). No Canadian of any race would be allowed to live in that misery.

But that same Canadian Broadcasting System will declare what a shame it is that the Evil White Man’s technology destroyed all those wonderful Traditional Ways of Life.

No one in Canada who points out this contradiction will get a job with CBC. He will be lucky if he isn’t arrested.

But this unmitigated crap is not only the property of the Politically Correct. It is swallowed whole by those who oppose PC.

Which means that they cannot look straight into the future, the real future, and see the opportunities there.

So the chasm between my thought and theirs is often unbridgeable.

They see biological advances as a plot against Traditional Values. They have a Frankenstein Complex.

I see the future as a sneak attack on our enemies.

They see it exactly the same way.

Social science professors are horrified that their theories are being tossed into the trash basket by discoveries about genes. Study of real evolution Carbon dating has thrown the traditional view of history, on which Marxism is firmly based, right into the toilet.

Everybody insists he wants children to have every advantage of NURTURE, of a good upbringing. Social scientists are fanatically opposed to all “monkeying” with genes,” but they endorse any social program they come up with, especially if it is expensive.

The big difference between future technology “monkeying” with genes and today’s “education” is taht technology will probably be able to demonkey” it if it is wrong.

But can we ever undo the damage done by PC “education” or the “good upbringing” taught a child that what is new is against God?

I doubt it. Lok at the “atnis” on Stormfront, with tehir airconditioners going and using the Intgernet to whine about the White Man’s Evil Mommy Professor taught them to recite.

Fifty years from now they will be using the Evil Techn0logy that overcame stone age culture to keep them healthy, and they will be singing The Guilt Songof the Evil White.

And beside them in a counterpoint song, will be conservatives denouncing all post-Biblical technology.

Gene changes are more curable.

Imposing re-education or what some preacher chooses to call Tradtiional Values is fine for the kiddies. But when it comes to giving the next generation the best possible GENES, conservatives and social scientists stand shoulder to shoulder. Everything should be done to give them Traditional Values or a Good Education, but God and those who claim to speak for God and the priests of Political Correctness declare from their respective pulpits that not one gene must be touched.

So as liberals sink deeper into he trash bags of history, so do conservatives.

For the word “conservative,” no matter how the media use it, has the same real meaning it always had. Liberals seek the old path of liberalism; conservatives seek a restoration, too.

I am the most radical person you are ever likely to meet.

There will be no restoration and I will never have to sit in an outhouse and fear the horseflies romantically threatening to sting me. I will never again move one brick at a time in a hot kiln where the rule is that if you passed our TWICE, you lost your job.

Only if the white race disappears from the earth will there be a Restoration, and I will fight it to my last breath.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by kane on 05/05/2006 - 7:35 pm

    “I see a world divided forever, where some will have a place to be in world of their traditional values and others will have their children by choosing their genes, and those who are traditional will be more and more like the Amish coach-drivers of Pennsylvania who reject all modern conveniences and are wholly unaware that those conveniences are right there in the buggies they drive.”
    Just make sure you don’t get stuck behind those buggies, lol, I’ll get a monster truck to run them over.

    But back on topic, I do believe we must deal with the issues that currently face us. A movement which fails to re-invent itself will die. The basics of business is innovate or die. The movement of egalitarinism beat the movement of racial integrity, and I believe we need to reverse this political trajedy of defeat. Both movements has always invented, but with the industrial revolution, their movement gained strength and ours lost strength. But we need to use the enivronmental situation handed to use of being in the year 2006 to the advantage of our movement, not to the disadvantage. But I don’t know how hip I am on the whole genetic engineering thing, though.

  2. #2 by Peter on 05/05/2006 - 8:15 pm

    This is rather excellent, writing, Bob. Don’t you think? Brilliant and to the point. You and Mark have much in common.

  3. #3 by Bob on 05/05/2006 - 8:34 pm

    I though I had inserted a comment from Mark into the body of the blog, but now I can’t FIND it!

    Which statement are you referring to?

  4. #4 by Mark on 05/05/2006 - 10:47 pm

    I’m honored, Peter, although I don’t think I can claim brilliance as one of my attributes. There’s days when I read your comments and Bob’s and realize I’m missing out on the hidden, subtextual message but for the life of me can’t understand where or what it is.

  5. #5 by Shari on 05/06/2006 - 10:10 am

    I don’t know that anyone wants to do away with technology. But a lot of things are driving us nuts, I think. We are not leading peaceful, prosperous, and free lives. Certainly the young are haveing a time. Also I thought that choosing your child’s genes had something to do with choosing who to form a family with. Of course everyone has something in their family history and I’d like to see things helped, but I also think that frankenstein science is a concern. While our race has been given much, I don’t think that we will sort everything out well, without Christ Himself.

  6. #6 by Shari on 05/06/2006 - 11:46 am

    To add to the above, did you ever read a piece by George MacDonald called The Castle? I think that he wrote a good picture of what I mean.

You must be logged in to post a comment.