Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

George Washington, the None-Too-Bright Genius

Posted by Bob on May 25th, 2006 under Coaching Session


Washington towers above the other Founding Fathers, but you almost never hear a quote from him.

If you do hear a quote from him, it was probably written for him by Hamilton or somebody. If you read biographies of GW you simply cannot conclude that his IQ would have tested above average.

I have studied and worked with testing a LOT. I worked with my doctor brother and we came up with testing methods he was especially invited to Walter Reed to talk about.

PLEASE don’t get bogged down into what IQ tests test. Analogy tests are better, becasue IQ tests were developed to tell the difference between the LEGAL, not medical, categories of idiot, imbecile, moron, subnormal and normal.

Mensa be damned, IQ tests are admissible in court, but they are NOT admissible to talk about how BRIGHT someone is. The analogy test is better for that.

The point is that even the best “intelligence” test, the PERFECT intelligence test, would have classified GW as about average.

But Washington was a genius.

There is a CORRELATION between intelligence and genius. There is a CORRELATION between I and height.

But Napolean was still highly intelligent.

Genius is CORRELATED to tested intelligence. But GW was a genius.

You see, intelligence is largely a matter of how fast your mind works, among other things. So while a highly intelligent person will LEARN to read fast, a genius like GW will never read fast.

Charlemagne tried hard, but he never learned to read at all.

So while a high-IQ person could leap from mountaintop to mountaintop in an hour, old George could ponder and ponder and ponder and finally come up with something said high-IQ type would NEVER come to.

That is what GENIUS is: Thinking of something no one else would EVER think of.

When the fighting in Boston got under way, a lot of people tried to jockey their way into being the Commander in Chief of the inevitable new American Army. They spoke, they made conncetions, they did the whole thing.

There is no record that Washington ever said a thing as a member of hte House of Burgesses. He figured he couldn’t compete that way.

So he just showed up at each session with his uniform on, six feet two inches of Silent Dignity. That was genius.

No big speeches, those were for politicians. No jockeying. That just made the other jockeys hostile.

He just showed up in his uniform saying, “When you stop babbling and want to get serious, I’m here.”

Actually GW wasn’t much of a general.

I will now do a separate piece on how he won the Revolution.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Alchemist on 05/25/2006 - 4:22 pm

    NOT SPAM? Yeah, there isn’t much doubt that GW had more instinct than intellect, which is a good thing because intellect usually gets in the way of thought.

  2. #2 by Pain on 05/25/2006 - 6:40 pm

    NOT SPAM

    Informative

  3. #3 by Antonio Fini on 05/25/2006 - 11:30 pm

    Washinton’s original training was in surveying and drafting, so he was basically an engineer. I think he was one of those visual spatial types, clumsy with words and abstract reasoning, while his more brilliant colleague Jefferson was good at everthing from architecture and law to expository writing and horticulture- an American Da Vinci.

    I read one of Washington’s modern decendants was an airplane designer, and his son in turn, ran a recording studio. In other words, both engineers. Talk about the iron grip of heredity.

  4. #4 by Dennis on 05/26/2006 - 5:03 am

    NOT SPAM

    There is a phrase that comes to mind “analysis paralysis”
    I believe this sort of ‘genius’ arises more from mental temperament and creativity rather than raw intelligence. It arises from lateral thinking and open minded simplism rather than complex analysis and debating.

You must be logged in to post a comment.