I was looking at Budarick’s piece again, which is quoted below. Like Budarick, you will have to be satisfied with my having your complete comments here and my demanding that people read them. I have read Budarick’s over and over. I have read every comment you send more than once. But what I cannot do is answer every point you make.

Every point you make send my mind into a dozen areas. Here is a good example:

Budarick says,

“I am wrong not because people tell me, though often they DO help me see it – even when they have other motives [being themselves always right is one of them].”

This is a leading comment for something else, but I must devote a whole piece here to what hit me from his full understanding of that word “motive.”

Some time back I wrote a piece called, “Repetition, Repetition, REPETITION!”

So if I am coing up and someone says, “Oh, my God! Here’s Whitaker. He’s going to repeat that Bob’s Mantra again:

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

As Budarick says, the average person wants desperately not to be wrong, and I don’t really take it that seriously.

Here is another thing the average person cannot bear. Someone saying that he is a BORE, that he is going to repeat the same thing AGAIN. And they repeat it to make me look bad, to make me look like a bore, to prepare the audience to look at me that way.

At that point, I have won what I am after. Never again can any person there think of some objective race problem where “the races” are being mixed. Years of carefully selected mental training just went down the garbage chute. He must now prove that genocide is something a Good Christian will accept or something that one must shrug at. But the point is that I have pounded it in so many times that the old question, one of simple “toleration,” is dead.

Repetition, repetition, repetition. Staying on message. Respectable cosnervative are PAID to back off when something really btohers the other side. Once again, what I say is so obvious that it sounds like a joke: if you have an enemy by the throat, don’t try to bite his leg. If you have him squirming repeat, repeat, repeat.

So Budarick brings up another continuing theme of mine ( another theme besides repeat, repeat, repeat).

If you want truth, you must always ask yourself: “WHY did he say that?”

But you must REPEAT it. You must repeat to yourself over and over and over, “WHY did he say that?”

This is the one answer that can destroy a Big Lie. You don’t ask if it is true. You START by analyzing WHY he said that. Why does a person say, “All men are created equal.” You can explain why Jefferso siad it. There was a war going on at the time, and if Jefferson’s side lost it, they would be hanged. So he threw in something silly that would appeal to silly French liberals at Versailles.

THEIR revolution, when the Rousseau French types took over, turned into a bloodbath and tyranny. OUR revolution was a success. But when he wrote the Declaration, Jefferson had to appeal to them. So he wrote that absurd statement.

But if you’re not in a war and about to be hanged, why on earth would YOU say that?

Motivation, motivation, MOTIVATION. If our conversation were limited to saying things because they are true, this would be a very silent world. When a person tells us that he will not say something because it is racist, you are in a perfect position to say,

“So you don’t care whether it is TRUE or not, you only care whether it is RACIST or not?”

Nobody, but NOBODY says that.

Why?

Becauise it requires a discipline every scientist should be aware of. Never fall in love iwht your theory. Examine yourself. What to you WANT to be true?

You are going to make it true if you want it to be true. That is how humans are. If you don’t keep saying “Motivation, Motivation, MOTIVATION!” over and over and over, you can forget research and just draw up a wish list.

But once you master the technique of “Motivation, Motivation, MOTIVATION!” once you learn to REPEAT it to yourself as a discipline, the Big Lie is at your mercy. His mindless repetition of the Big Lie b ecomes a battle for the survival of his big lie.

The Big Lie is at your mercy.

Don’t have any.