Now to the FIRST part of Mark’s question:

Why do I say that “Christianity” — Shari, PLEASE note the quotation marks — CREATED the

Jews?”

There is a whole category of Jews called ashkenazi. As usual, the USAGE of this term

outside Judaism is entirely different from its meaning.

What that word actually means is “A Jew who is descended from non-Jews.” The entire

population of Khazars, which may now constitute a majority of Jews, is descended from the

Khazar kingdom which converted to Judaism many centuries ago.

If you take an advanced literature course, you will read that Franz Kafka’s short story, “Metamorphasis” is the essense of JEWISH thought.

Actually Franz Kafka WAS a Jew, but he was the descendant of recent CONVERTS to Judaism. The author of the epitome of Jewish thought was ashkenazi.

Here is how that happened:

Franz Kafka’s ancestors had been part of a pre-Lutheran Protestant rebellion against the Catholic Church in what is now the Czech Republic, then Bohemia. The pope gave John Huss a free pass to come talk to Catholic authorities, who then burned him alive.

Oddly enough, the Hussites did not LIKE the Catholic Church much. Finally, after years of total war, the Hussites were crushed.

This was before there were any Protestant countries, so the surviving followers of Huss were given a choice of two choices. Catholic Europe burned anyone alive who not either 1) Catholic, or 2) a Jew.

I repeat, Huss’s ancestors did not like the Catholic Church much. So they chose to JEWS instead. As a result the prime example of Jewish literature had no GENETIC relationship whatever to the Old Testament Jews Robertson and Falwell worship.

So when someone digs into the Old Testament or into a Great Conspiracy to determine what

Jews are, he ignores the simple fact that Jews today are the product of two thousand years

of people BECOMING Jews and people assimilating into the non-Jewish population.

In every single generation for two thousand years and more, Jews have been leaving Judaism

and gentiles have been converting to Judaism. Despite what you are told, there is nothing

new about this.

Let’s look back to the Hussites, Franz Kafka’s forebears. They AND the whole Khazar kingdom came INTO Judaism, but the total population of Jews over time remained about the same. A lot of Jews DISAPPEARED, just as they did under the Third Reich.

So I have to say all the other Jews were murdered or go to prison in Europe for a minimum two-year sentence, right?

Well, no. Historians are allowed to point out that while there were huge convesations INTO Judaism, Jews had a lot of pressure on them to convert into the religion followed by the surrounding goyim, non-Jews.

Unlike every other population, be they heretics like the Hussites or our own ancestor who were Odinist or Druid, they were allowed to stay ALIVE in “Christian” countries if they were Jews. But in every country, Moslem, Catholic or Protestant, the pressure was on for two thousand years for them to convert to the ruling faith.

A reminder: People who are burned alive don’t reproduce.

Remember, if you were tried to be Moslem in a Christian country, you were burned alive. If you tried to be a Protestant in a Catholic country you were burned alive. If you tried ot be a Catholic in a Protestant country, you were usually hanged instead of burned.

Being hanged hurts less. But the genetic result is much the same.

So what we call “Jews” today generally contains some of the old semitic genes, but its behavior is the result of two thousand years of concentrated genetic change. For two thousand years, those who fitted into the population around them have steadily assimilated into the surrounding goyim. For two thousand years, those who were hostile to the society around them have converted INTO Judaism.

In our society, the hostile group we call Jews is entirely the product of “Christianity.” The Jews constitute a genetically hostile gene pool which has been the natural product of this weird twist in what calls itself “Christianity.”

“Christianity” created Jews.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

“Christianity” CREATED Jews.
If anybody wants to hear about it, I will explain this.”

I’ll bite. Explain away. Oh, and btw, are “judaizers” the same as “zionists” or am I not clear on what you and Shari mean?

Comment by Mark

MY OBSERVATIONS

As I explained below, the Politically Correct student or professor ( there is no difference but how many timed they repeated the doctrine) would have ready answer: “You don’t know THAT? You are IGNORANT, and I won’t bother to answer!”

But it puts an intellectual, who is surrounded by a bunch of keen, seminar-level minds, in a hell of a position.

I LOVE being in a hell of a position.

You see, this is so BASIC, to use the brilliant comment discussed below, that every word I say about BOTH judaizing and Zionism is going to be a land mine. So many people here know so much about BOTH, FROM THE GROUND up, that they can chew me out and spit me up for a misstep.

So, on to the fun!

Zionism (he said, treading carefully) is the belief that Jews have a right to a homeland of their own, a homeland madeup exclusively of JEWS. That is the DEFINITION of Zionism. That is NOT what most people mean when they use the term.

First of all, when people say Zionist today, they mean the State of Israel. But Zion does not have to be in any given spot. STRICTLY SPEAKING, a Zionist is one who believes in a homeland for Jews, whether it is in Palestine or at the South Pole.

But that is not the way most pro-whites use the term Zionist. The penalty for being anti-Jew today runsf rom being ruined professionally to being imprisoned, or both. So those who object to what Jews are doing use the a code-word. They say they are NOT anti-semitic, they are anti-Zionist.

If I had MY way, I would be BOTH.

As Noah Webster pointed out, in language USEAGE is everything. In today’s USAGE, you are anti-semitic if you do not grovel, slobber, and give endless praise to Jews. IN today’s USAGE, I am definitely an anti-semite.

Because I am an “anti-semite,” I am a Zionist. That is, I believe that there should be a homeland where ALL Jews not only MAY go, but MUST go.

In that land, they would be more than welcome to make EACH OTHER more Jewish. They SHOULD Judaize each other there. It’s called naturalization.

But what they do in their own Zion is not my prtoblem.

But when they try to make MY PEOPLE Jewish, when they judaize US, that IS my problem.

When ANYBODY judaizes US, that is MY problem, I don’t care who is doing it, Abe Foxman or Pat Robertson. That is what Shari is talking about.

When Jews judaism each other, they are teaching the basic premise of Judaism. The basic premise of Judaism is that the Jews are God’s Chosen People. God is only concerned about Jews: “Thou shalt have no other god before me.”

This means that the only people God allows to have a loyalty to their own is the Chosen People, the Jews. So if any of US are loyal to our own people, we are defying God. Jews should be loyal only to Jews AND non-Jews shold only be loyal to Jews.

That is why Emma Lazarus and Alan Dershowitz and Abe Foxman (head of the Anti-Defamation League of B’Nai-Brith or ADL) always took it for granted that white gentiles needed to be done away with in a melting pot while Jews must be preserved. Our destruction is a natural consequence, a fundamental DEMAND, of the Jewish outlook on life.

And that is precisely what Pat Robertson, who is NOT a Jew, preaches. The Chosen People of God are, by definition, AT LEAST the Master Race. Even a committed pro-white like me would hesitate to say that whites are the ONLY group that has the right to exist.

My own people are the only ones ***I””” asm interested in preserving. But it is no part of my program to DESTROY other people’s identity. In fact, I respect those like Stokeley Carmichel who fight for their own precisely because I DO want to preserve my own.

Judaizing is precisely the opposite. Judaizing requires the DESTRUCTION of every kind of identity that is not the preservation of Jews. If you do not demand the destruction of all loyalties exept a loyalty to Jews, God’s Chosen People, you are committing blasphemy in the eyes of Jewish Law AND gentile judaizers like Pat Robertson.

Our destruction is the first law of Judaism.

I get a laugh out of the fact that so many people consider this some kind of Secret Conspiracy. The best selling book in history is the Bible, including the Old Testament Jews cling to. The best sellingbook on earth THIS YEAR is the Bible, seventy percent of which is the Old Testament the Jews cling to. You will find that book in every motel room you go to.

If this is a Secret, it is the worst-kept secret anyone could ever imagine!

If my race is to survive, we must stop people who are judaizing us. Most of them today are NOT Jews.

There should be a place for Jews. It should be a place where they will stop infecting US and can only spread their disease to each other.

That is my kind of Zionism.

NO SPAM

NO SPAM

There is a place for you Bob!

In the year i have been a loyal reader, you have caused me to think more than all four years of high school.

Although i don’t have much to contribute to this seminar, unless you want to hear about my life, one day i will be able to join in the fun. All thanks to your basics.

Keep up the good work Bob!

and from one of your comments to me, enjoy this flower.

MY OBSERVATIONS:

Thank YOU, for making MY efforts worth while!

And for having the guts to SPEAK UP! If I’m lucky, you’re going to make me EARN that damned flower.

“Although i don’t have much to contribute to this seminar, unless you want to hear about my life,”

Don’t hit me with the Shari Syndrome. Shari makes excellent comments and then adds a sentence about how dumb she thinks it must sound. That ticks me off.

YOU don’t give YOURSELF hell. ***I*** give you hell. That’s your tuition here.

Got it?

Jokes aside, you are eighteen, so you can remind us what the BASIC questions are. You used that word a COUPLE of times here, and reminded us all that going back to BASICS is the point here. That is what I keep emphasizing most of all.

Real genius, real INTELLECTUALISM, is mostly going right back to the basics again and again and coming up with a new insight from the ground up.

You are NOT really a neophyte the way you think of yourself. You have already been through the paleos, the radicals and probably a lot more. When you say you are new at this, you have just testified against your own statement.

But you ARE new enough to keep my nose to the grindstone. Too many commenters may not understand what I am talking about, but they do not ask me to explain SPECIFICALLY what they don’t get. That ruins the whole lesson.

For example Mark asked me to explain my discussion with Shari about “judaizers” and how that related to Zionism.

That provides me with some welcome work. I am still working on it.

It also shows how Shari is advanced while she is always telling us what a newbie she is. She is talking at a level another commenter had the GUTS to tell me he wasn’t up to snuff on.

You are dead on point: BASICS, “What do you mean, Bob?” These are invaluable contributions you can make.

You are probably already aware that a good teacher learns more from going over basics, again and again, than the student does. Thinking about the exact place of Zionism and Judaizing gives me a whole new view of BOTH.

The simple fact is that I learn more from analyzing basics than you do because I already KNOW more than you do. If I don’t, then all I have is DEAD knowledge, ROTE knowledge.

If I don’t learn from this exercise, then there is something wrong with ME as a teacher. Today’s academic is NOT an “intellectual” precisely because they learn NOTHING from going over THEIR tape recorded orthodoxy again and again and again. That is why they are NOT the “intellectuals” they claim they are.

I keep telling commenters, including you, that you QUALIFY for my seminar because have outgrown a college education, WHETHER YOU HAVE HAD ONE OR NOT.

I am disappointed when you don’t realize that I don’t dish out compliments freely. If I give you a compliment, TAKE IT.

Mark doesn’t mind getting my nose, and Shari’s back into the basics because he knows he has already QUALIFIED to be here, so if he has a question, it is worth asking.

Another critical point: When I tell you this I am LEADING a seminar, not TEACHING a course, it is also a brag on ME. The reason a real, old-fashioned SEMINAR is out-of-date on campuses today is precisely because a COURSE is now just a set of hoops the teacher makes a student jump through. Today the teacher gets nothing out of what he calls a course or a seminar but a paycheck.

I am bragging that I am not just a teacher, I am an intellectual. I am going to try my stuff out on you, which is what a real professor does in a real seminar. I welcome best comeback you’ve got. Me being wrong is not only OK, it’s what I’m here to be TOLD. It is your DUTY to point it out.

Meanwhile I am going to pick your brain and SQUEEZE it, which makes it worth while for you.

But never forget that I am making the biggest brag of all: I am a dying breed, an intellectual, not just an average run-in-the-mill professor.

How conceited can you GET?

I PAY for this privilege. You OWE me more comments and less apologies.

I don’t do this just for the fun of giving picking on you.

Well, I don’t do this seminar ENTIRELY for the fun of picking on you.

Hell, the Old Man has got to have some fun, too!