Dave says, in part,

“But my concern is with white bearing and virility.

For example, 200 years ago, despite their defeats, the Scotts still had their “bearing” as a people. At the time of our Revolution, the world was full of Scotsmen who breathed only for the chance to kill an Englishman. They were “Scotts” true.

Look at what pathetic specimens of humanity the Scotts are today. The process of industrialization and English welfare utterly crushed them.

Now everything about them is phony. Their pride is phony. Their nationhood is phony. Their manhood is phony. They are utterly phony in all facets of their existence. It’s horrible. ”

ME:

I am still convinced that the Boere in South Africa are on their knees because of what I call The Sauron Problem. Sauron put most of his power in the One Ring,and when that Ring was destroyed, he fell. The Boere invested their nationhood in the reformed Church and the National Party. When those institutions betrayed Afrikaaner nationhood 51% of Afrikaaners vote Ja! to end the old South Africa.

I saw what happened to Southerners when their nationhood was invested in the Democratic Party. In 1948 the Deep South pulled out of the Democratic Party. But Georgia and the rest of the Solid South remained with the hard-left Democrats. I have seen first-hand how hard it is to get people to pry their loyalties away from an institution like the Reformed Church or the National Party or the Democrats.

The same thing happened to the Southern Nation in the Civil War. Too many Southerners like Andrew Johnson and Sam Houston and Henry Clay and Andrew Jackson had invested their loyalty in the United States. Our mountain and borfder regions sent more troops to the Union than to the Confederacy. If we had seceded at any earlier time, we wold be an independent nation, but too many Southerners were absolutely loyal to the New England commercial empire that was called The United States.

We have invested our nationhood in theocracy, like the Southern nationalist movement, which is basically just a Presbyterian theocracy. Jerry Falwell is about hte only national spokesman who says that if there were a war today between the North and the South, he would take the Southern side. But Jerry Falwell’s only REAL loyalty is to his Book. And in HIS Book the only nation he is loyal to is Israel.

But Falwell is not alone in this. People simply will not say, “I am loyal to my race. By definition, a melting pot is nothing specific. Anyone who is deeply loyal to nothing specific is in desperate need of psychiatric care.”

Everybody wants to be objective. The funniest example of this is Ayn Rand.

You see, all the word “freedom” means is that you do what YOU want to do. But this is not glorious enough for a wordist society. So we have to have Freedom, something that is a higher calling than freedom. So Ayn Rand called her philosophy, which is doing what YOU want to do, Objectivism. You can’t follow your subjective preferences without someone telling you how objective they are.

The fact that nobody but me laughs at this shows how mired we are in Wordism.

We keep looking anxiously at whether the Powers That Be are responding to the grassroots rebellion. We measure our success, not in expressing our views, but in whether CBS News is reporting on us. Is George Will mentioning us. Is Pat Buchanan mentioning us?

The Soviet Empire had ALREADY gone down before the media noticed it. They were laughing at cartoons about Ukrainian and Estonian secession that showed those countries in Confederate uniforms.

William Rusher was hit by this when he finally came over to my side and strated demanding a Reagan coalition with the South and “the Wallace Vote,” which the media now calls the deciding “Reagan Democrats.” It has been simply blanked out of history that this idea was attacked by everybody, including National Review, of which Rusher was publisher.

The media has forgotten those Confederate cartoons. Since 1980 everybody on National Review has forgotten their cover article attacking me personally. But in his book on the Reagan “Revolution” called “The Rise of the Right,” Rusher said, “The staff of National Review doesn’t believe anything that isn’t in the New York Times.”

Stormfronters are always talking about how a revolution is well financed.

It isn’t. When the Democrats really ruled America in the 1930s the money was Republican. In 1932 German cartoons showed Hitler sweating and trying to pay off the NSDAP debt. Money doesn ot LEAD power, money FOLLOWS power.

Afrikaaners invested their nationahood in institutions, their church and their National Party, just as Southerners invested their nationhood in the Democratic Party. But once you give your loyalty to an institution, once you give your CREDIBILITY to an institution, that institution begins to follow it OWN goals.

The traitor head of the National Party got his Nobel Prize. The traitor Reformed Church got its recognition from the World Council of Churches. Southern Democrats did not have to pay the price for disloyalty to the National Party.

Media attention, like money, FOLLOWS revolution.

This is so obvious no one notices the logic of it. A REAL revolution depends on the sergeants in the field, and nobody will notice them until they have ALREADY won. This is why the constant tradingof headlines on Stormfront is so damned ridiculous.

NOT SPAM
Unfortantely, the supreme court rulled against separate but equal and the military was brought in to enforce that. Maybe they have more power in the modern era, with judges legislating from the bench. Nothing punishes a supreme court judge who doesn’t follow the consitution, you are supposed to just trust them…yeah right!

Comment by kane

ME:

Yes, Federal troops were used to enrorce integration when Aransas and Mississippi tried to resist it.

But no respectable conservative will ever mention that today many cities refuse to enforce laws against illegal immigration. In fact, many cities have declared themselves to be havens for illegals. If the president was constitutionalrly required to send troops to the South, why are there no Federal troops in those cities?

This is ammunition to use on the firing line, not a purely philosophical question.

If war were decided by the number of generals, the Confederacy would have won. We had more generals, qualified generals, than they did.

In fact we even had an advantage in manpower at first. It is estimated that inthe coupelof months afdter Fort Sumter was fired on, some 300,000 Southerners volunterred for service in the Confederate Army. Lincoln was having difficulty getting the 75,000 he called for. But the South couldn’t USE its 300,000 volunteers.

Why? Because we lacked two things:

1) Sergeants and

2) Guns

We had plenty of generals, but what we needed was sergeants to train that 300,000 men. If we had had the sergeants, we could probably have gotten guns, guns were not rare in the South. There was never a better strategist born than General Robert E. Lee but in the end you have to have guns aimed at the enemy, people inteh trenches firing, and Lee simply did not have enough of those.

I want to fight, not make strategy. I gave you guns to use, Bob’s Mantra and “Heresy!” I am more of a sergeant than a general. Stormfront is one solid mass of generals.

Bob’s Mantra

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

HERESY!

Each society has its own word for HERESY!

Communists called all HERESY! fascism. Fascist Italy called all HERESY Communist.

Today, under the Politically Correct tyranny, HERESY! is called HATE! or “racism.” Nobody wants to try to deal with a point like Bob’s Mantra, so they start demanding that nobody say it, just like any other tyranny does. They call people who speak HERESY! names.

You Political Correctness fanatics are playing a very old game.

When you call people names who disagree with you or scream Hate or racism, a.k.a., HERESY! it says nothing about the point we heretics make.

But it tells us ALL about YOU.

And quit right there.

Try it.

I have found that when they are confronted with an argument like this or Bob’s Mantra, they see desperately for something ELSE you said that they can argue about to avoid the simple point you made.

DON’T give them that opportunity. Say it and make them ANSWER it or insult you or throw labels.

Then just put this same point back again.

The other side only has two defenses,

1) To ignore Bob’s Mantra: and

2) To scream HERESY! at us.

Cut them off at the pass.