It now seems pretty beyond question that Atlantis and the Flood of Gilgamesh and Noah all were a fact of history. Plato says that wisdom and learning came from there, and that once it went down the world slowly began to regain some of the greatness that had been in Atlantis. It also seems more and more unquestionable that the Black Sea is the Urheimat, the original home, of the Indo-European race.

All this depends on what the Black Sea Valley was actually like before the Flood. And nobody, least of all historians and archeologists, has any incentive to find out what it was like. Like the blond mummies in China, it is big news and a big embarrassment which they try hard to ignore.

One of the major roadblocks to science is that the preternatural becomes the supernatural.

Preternatural means something for which we have not YET found a scientific explanation. Supernatural means a miracle, something that happens for causes we will never know and in defiance of natural law.

When we do not know the reason for something, it is open to exciting theories. Those theories end up making the whole thing look ridiculous. Atlantis is one of these things. One thing any scientist would have told you up to ten years ago is that, if there WAS such a place as Atlantis, it did not, as advertised, drown completely in a single day.

Plato is the only source we have for a short mention of Atlantis. Actually a whole civilization DID drowning a single day not very far from where Plato lived. In fact, in the very place where this disaster began, the official language was Greek until Constantinople became Istanbul in 1453.

The special value of the city that was Byzantium and then Constantinople and is now Istanbul is that it is the only way ships can sail onto the Black Sea. The Black Sea was created in ONE DAY. What I will call the Black Sea Valley, the area that was land before that fateful day, was far larger than Greece. It was probably very fertile.

The Black Sea Valley was protected from the Mediterranean by the land bridge that existed where Istanbul is today. The bottom of it is still sea water. That tiny land bridge eroded slowly. Then, ONE DAY, it broke. On that day it reached critical mass, and a deluge came roaring across it at about two hundred miles per hour. We are finding other places where this took place, some of them in America.

The most improbable thing about Atlantis is the one that did, in fact, occur. The whole country went down in a single day. The water rushed in, but it rocked back and forth for quite a while. About the only place anyone could have been while it rocked was on a high place on the very edge of the Black Sea, like Mount Ararat.

We have a complete history of the world that does not recognize that anything ever happened in the Black Sea Valley. If you ask over 99% of the population where Mount Ararat is, they will say it’s somewhere near Israel.

As I said before, only when evolution reached the Aryan stage did a people begin to question the value of life itself. Suicide is common in the Orient, but it is always a sacrifice or an apology. Buddhism came from a blue-eyed Aryan named Gautama Buddha, and Buddha offered guidance on how one could avoid life completely. His goal, like the goal of the religion Buddhism came from, the Judaism to Buddha’s Christianity.

There is a similar historical relationship between Christianity and Judaism, but what makes me suspicious of the insistence that Christianity was ENTIRELY a product of the Old Testament is the fact that the GOALS of Judaism and Christianity are entirely different. Even in Jesus’ time, many of the Temple priests denied any kind of rebirth, and the concept of Heaven and Hell is vague at best in Judaism.

By contrast Buddha and Hinduism had the same goal: an escape from the eternal curse of the Wheel of Life, the misery of living forever as one animal after another, with respites when one’s karma got one TEMPORARILY into Nirvana.

A lot of people laugh at the Islamic idea of a bevy of renewable virgins, but in the Deep Wisdom of Hinduism and Buddhism, the first sign that one’s time in Nirvana was ending was that one began to have and smell bad breath.

Now let’s get back to basics. Aryans questioned the value of life ITSELF. They did not see life as a good thing, and the agonies of old age in those times was something Buddhism emphasized. This relates to those who think that hunting is bad. They assume that, if the hunter didn’t kill them, animals would die in a hospital loaded with painkillers and their family weeping around them.

An animal that dies from a hunter’s or is suffocated for five minutes by a lion is relatively lucky. A kudu killed by wild dogs on the African veldt is slowly eaten alive for an hour or two. Other kinds of death take longer.

So Aryans noticed that whoever ran THIS world was not kind. The Hindus and Buddhists wanted to escape the whole process. They did not want to die that way a million times and counting. Up in Persia, Zoroaster hit on a different formula. He declared that the god of THIS world was indeed evil. But the god of the NEXT world, Ahura-Mazda, was good:

“My kingdom is not of THIS world.”

But as ideas get discussed and people get paid to “interpret” them, Aryans tend to carry them to their logical extreme. Thus Zoroastrianism, which was the religion of the land Mani came from, Iraq, had by his time degenerated into a belief that this world was altogether evil, and everything about it was evil. Mani was a Christian, but he openly synthesized the two great religions of his time, the Christianity based in Constantinople that ruled Rome and the equally vast Persian Empire of Zoroastrianism.

Mani developed a Christian heresy called Manichaeism, which called for universal human sterility. But Mani was a latecomer. The same idea had been propounded in a modified form by St. Paul. Paul said it was better to remain sterile, but one could still attain heaven if he had sex AND a Christian marriage:

“It is better to marry than to burn.”

Some heretics wanted to get rid of the Old Testament completely, and each of them called for Manichaeism: “Sterility NOW!”

For two thousand years, the Church has struggled to separate Paul’s Zoroastrian hatred of this world from Mani’s doctrine. The problem is that they both come from the same source, and no one in any church can admit what that source WAS. They must maintain the hypnotic fiction that early Christianity developed entirely and solely from the Old Testament. Protestants have a harder time, because they must shoehorn every Christian doctrine into the Old Testament that most Jews in Christ’s time couldn’t even READ.

The Old Testament for the majority of Roman Jews was in Greek, not Hebrew, and Luther decided these must be false texts since everything had to develop from Hebrew and this was in Greek.

But, again, back to basics. Aryans have been trying to deal with the simple fact that, in those times, life was seldom worth living with a CONCEPT they realized: Something HAPPENS to you when you die. The concept of an afterlife was a major basis of Egyptian civilization, so that concept was certainly around a long, long time. But Egyptians simply provided for the next life the way they would for an extension of this one.

Aryans, Hindu, Buddhist, Zoroastrian and Christian, decided that THIS life was, on balance, NOT something they wanted to extend indefinitely. There must be a Higher State in the next world, because they could not bear to face endless repetitions of THIS life.

To repeat the old Spanish proverb, “If life were worth living, we would not need so many philosophers.”

But in white countries today, we are becoming less and less tolerant of misery. That is the reason Western Civilization has roared around the world the way the Mediterranean roared over our ancestors when their homeland became the Black Sea. Every other civilization is built on a stoic survival of misery. Western civilization has an endless list of valid criticisms, but it is not based on the idea that one must find a Deep Reason to lie down and let the world roll over you. That idea only returned with the World War II Generation.

Contrary to popular stereotypes, even the Victorian Morality was not based on a worship of misery. They saw the superiority of a self-disciplined white society over others and they insisted on it. In Victorian times if you ate a lot of sugar your teeth rotted. If you drank a lot you could pay a huge price. A girl who had a bastard child suffered tremendously.

In Victoria’s day, infant mortality was huge, and huge families were needed in Europe just to keep the population constant. There simply was not time for a young woman to have and raise the children needed and have an occupation as well.

In America this habit of huge families ran into the fact that, in America, children survived. We had all the population we needed, with a little more natural growth, when the cheap-labor mania set in in the middle 1800s. We could pick and choose a few more good immigrants, but immigration did NOT populate America. In 1850 some 90% of our white population probably descended from pre-1700 immigration.

So Victorian morality largely reflected the realities of its time, not a male chauvinist plot to “keep women down.” Compared to women in most other societies in Victoria’s time, women were wildly free in the West. Most Womens’ Lib spokespersons are Jewish, but have you ever heard them discuss all those wonderful rights Jewish women used to have in the ghettoes and in the Middle East?

Back to America after 1850. The Civil War destroyed a major segment of the population that would have been born to the old maids who proliferated after it, but our population was growing nicely anyway. In 1921 nd 1923 America passed the Immigration and Nationalities Act. These acts were aimed at keeping our population as it was ethnically, and the fact that more immigration for its own sake was no longer necessary.

These Immigration and Natruralization Acts provided for a MAXIMUM of 300,000 immmigratns a year into a population of over over 110 million. It formalized the fact that Ameriuca was NOT “a nation of immigrants.”

In 1965, the World War II Gneration got rid of this 1921 and 1923 rejection of hte idea that we somehow owe it to the world to destroy oursleves.

The Misery Philosophy did not come from the Victorians. Only with the World War II Generation did we return to self-destruction as an ideal.