Archive for January 13th, 2007

Will the Black Sea Valley Ever be Studied?

Commenters take it for granted that the Black Sea Valley will be studied more. The Caucasian mummies in China have NOT been studied more. They are in the Memory Hole. As one astronaut said, “I always hoped I might be the FIRST man on the moon. It never occurred to me that I would be the LAST.”

Here is where my memory comes in. You don’t realize how many things get completely ignored because, well, they are completely ignored. There is nobody to remind you of them, and most people write about the latest news release.

From what I can see, the last exploration there was in 2001, by the same man who did the earlier one. He was disappointed that they found wood from trees instead of houses when they sent hooks away down there. Actually, if you dropped a hook into modern France, which is smaller and far more crowded than the Black Sea Valley was, you would come up almost entirely with trees unless you happened to hit on an urban area.

And there it stopped. “Christians” don’t want any exploration there. Liberals do not want to risk finding the Urheimat of the Indo-European race they have persuaded everybody to forget about. They want to talk about how the Nubians built Egypt while Northern Europeans grunted and waited to learn how to use the opposable thumb.

Without my kind of memory, maybe you cannot really see how critical the Manufacture of Information is. Anything that is not in the newspaper in the last month is FORGOTTEN. We have a better Memory Hole than Orwell did.

Whole areas of study, involving tens of billions of dollars, from theology to social science, are invested entirely in the Garbage Dump Theory of History. Who is going to defy all that and finance the huge project it would be to get down under all that fresh and sea water?

The truth will eventually out, but that is because, as I pointed in my forgotten summation to A Plague on Both Your Houses, the whole social science establishment is facing an embryonic NEXT establishment. Carbon dating and frontal lobes and a lot of other things want money, and another study of how blacks suffer or the Holocaust is taking it. I can see signs of this frustration now, but I could not explain it in the time I want to devote to it.

Black Sea History will be an afterthought, and it won’t come from history or archeology. Advancing science in fifty years will let us read the Black Sea bed very clearly.

That is why I hesitate to make predictions. I know where things are going but I am weary, weary unto DEATH of guiding people back into rational thought. Most of the people I deal with are like bowling beginners; the ball hits the floor and, at slightly different distances, goes over into the gutter.

But I see the basics spreading. That is the only point that matters. When it hits the headlines, some people will ready to absorb it.

Besides, I would have to repeat it eery two weeks and I don’t want to bother.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

What Al Made Me Think of

Al’s discussed my new Weltanschauung, and I do have a very different (world) outlook, which is what the word, as Al says, means. Yes, as I have said before, we will have to reexamine ALL the basics, not argue about the latest theory that has been built on the intellectual manure pile left us by the twentieth century.

Once again, my outlook is influenced by an ability to put myself back into mindsets I have lived through that everyone else has totally forgotten. You can look up quotes, but no one else seems to be able to FEEL what the mindset was in the 1950s and each decade since.

I FEEL what it was like when the first heart transplant took place down in backward South Africa. The replacee didn’t live but a few months, but that was considered a miracle at the time. No one before had ever had his heart removed and lived at all.

By the time I had my brain operation in 1994 at Duke the first patient I ran into in the special lab was a guy who had had a heart transplant. Stopping the heart during an operation, absolutely unthinkable in my youth, is routine now. In fact, the heart was a greater mystery to us then than the brain is now.

During this century, we will be putting an extension onto dogs’ brains, artificial frontal lobes that will allow them to think as we do and communicate with us. Then, at last, we will have to throw away theological and philosophical conveniences and start talking seriously about humanness and the self. Only I seem to realize the barriers that are falling away, while others seem happy to debate the same things we have talked to death long ago.

Self is considered a pure abstract beside all the “practical” discussion. The language used by silicon chips was developed as an impractical theoretical bit long before we had practical use for them. Who CARED what the distance was to the moon? The very language we speak today includes subjects that were hopelessly esoteric well within my lifetime.

And the pace relative to the present world view is getting faster.

I am just reading, again, a book called “Before Civilization” which was written just as carbon dating was first being used. The writer was trying desperately to say that the historians who had insisted everything came from the Middle East were not, well, ridiculous. He was, after all, writing a peer review book, and his peers would not allow the horselaugh they deserved.

But the fact is that doctors who bled patients were damned fools posing as intellectuals, and the whole Garbage Dump or Middle Eastern or diffusionist theory of history collapsed as soon as the facts began to come in from carbon dating. So we can either join the respectable conservatives and earnestly discuss what great scholars the clown who got it ALL wrong were, or we can go ahead.

The dog we stick a temporary frontal lobe on is entirely different from a computer. We assume he has a being, a self that no computer can ever have. We have no idea exactly when that self, that ability to feel joy and pain, begins. Yet that one thing, the self, is the basis of everything we consider worth worrying about.

To ask whether non-whites have the same selfhood we do is not an idle question. Like everything else it may boil down to some do and some don’t. But BEWARE! The old rules don’t work here. No matter how brilliant your computer gets, we have no indication it will develop a self.

We do not even know whether things TASTE the same to different people. How can we tell? It is known that liver and others things taste different to different people. Not that long ago, it was assumed that “everybody, all human beings, regardless of race or anything else, tasted the same things, saw the same,” and so forth.

One of the commenters who said what he would have said had I never been born reacted to my discussion of IQ and MMPI, which made the point over and over that these were mere indicators of difference. He said I was making race OBJECTIVE, which is exactly what the whole series of articles was about NOT doing. But this same commenter has doubtless been reacting the same way hundreds of times to anyone who discussed such testing, and he does not feel obligated to read what I actually wrote. This is his knee-jerk and this is just another opportunity for him to jerk his knee.

So what do we do about the dog we have just “SHAZAM! BOOMed” into what common discussion today would call humanity by putting the frontal lobe on him? I remember one fanatically anti-white conservative who was also anti-environmentalist, but he worried about dolphins. With those big brains, were they SHAZAMed? I had a lot of respect for his concern. At least it was consistent. Anything with a big brain could be human, but it made no difference at all what the difference in brains was between humans.

In the future, we are going to determine what race our children will be. Those who refuse to use Evil Genetic Engineering are the very ones who demand as much SOCIAL engineering as they can get. But it won’t last for a practical reason. If you have dumb kids relative to the rest they won’t make it.

In fact, you will be in the position of the Amish: Cute. The Amish have twentieth-century technology build into every horse carriage. If they tried to use the ones that were around in Biblical times, with no suspension AT ALL and no roadways built by others at all, it wouldn’t last long. They don’t need vaccinations because modern technology and others taking the shots has wiped out all the things they would otherwise die from. The Amish, like the Quakers, can be pacifists because others will protect them.

But unlike the Quakers, they don’t stab everybody else in the back who is defending them.

You cannot do unto others as you would have them do unto you unless you know what “others” means. As with history, all I know is that the present rules are droolingly absurd. A doctor who picked up a copy of Galen and showed off his knowledge of Latin and Greek by bleeding patients who had pneumonia without antiseptics would be in prison or a madhouse in a week.

Likewise with diffusionist history. Conservatives love to point to it, their whole world view is based on the “Everything came from the Middle East” view. But it is not, as they love to sway, “The old history is mistaken.

It is no more mistaken than bleeding for pneumonia was mistaken. Diffusionism is droolingly, laughably ABSURD. There is no room for compromise with bleeding therapy and there is no compromise with the history that atheistic academia and “Christians” have built their world on.

Bleeding and diffusionism are GONE. Garbage Dump History is GONE to any sane mind. There are just too many people around who have devoted their lives to it, including William Buckley, Jr. and Pat Robertson, who cannot let it go quickly. If you want to join them in their nostalgia, that is not my problem.

I am perfectly willing to make polite room for silly little nostalgics. They’re cute, like the Amish.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

Gee, Whiz, Al!

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

OK, I wrote a reply yesterday but I didn’t send it. Here is my rewritten reply after more thinking.

Of course humans are animals. But what I see what you are trying is introduce another frame of thought. But more than that, you are trying to introduce a new Weltanschaunng (world view).

I see the current Weltanschaunng as saying that all people are humans. We have black humans, yellow humans and white humans — but we’re all human. And we are more similar than different. Where there are differences, we should work to correct them, not to separate and segregate. Where some are lower, we must try our best to raise them up to our level.

You are trying to introduce a world-view that dehumanizes us. It makes us think of ourselves as animals. Then, we can say the non-whites are lower animals (or lower breeds). It seems like an un-Christian way of thinking. (Or at least the sick brand of Christianity, as you refer to it, that says, “According to the Bible, there are no “races” – there is only one race: the human race. We are all descended from Adam and Eve and diversity came later.”)

I’ll just say that if many people adopted the latter view, nobody would care about denying the Holocaust anymore.

Comment by YearningForFreedom

ME:

This is one of those “Gee, whiz” answers: “Gee, whiz, but the truth is too COLD!”

The Gee whiz used to be, “Gee whiz, if you think different races have different IQs, you are dehumanizing us. We are all just, well, gosh, humans!” Yes, Al, I consider the whole concept that all men are created equal as pure unmitigated crap the same way the Founding Fathers did.

Average differences in IQ are pretty well accepted now (ever the New York Times admits it!) except in the most remote corners of academia.

If you can’t live with reality, that is called insanity.

If we found that chimpanzees were interbreedable with man, would it “dehumanize” us to still consider they are DIFFERENT? Well, gee, whiz, of course it would!

That is the kind of “human” I definitely want to be dehumanized from, the silly kind. We fought all this crap out when Galileo was suppressed for saying the earth is not the center of the universe. Humanity’s planet was no longer the center all creation so that dehumanized us.

Hey, Al, after four hundred years, do you think you can accept Galileo now? Four hundred years is a long, long time. I mean, Gee whiz, Al, give the guy a break!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Two Parts of Modern Thought

Modern thought agrees that oil-producing countries have all the rights to what happens to be under their soil. But not one single OPEC country ever contributed anything to the technology that makes oil valuable. Not one OPEC country found the oil under its feet. OPEC countries are not capable of getting that oil out from under their feet themselves.

But every liberal, and therefore every respectable conservative, insists that the people of a country that has oil accidentally under their feet have the right to what it is worth, AND the right to set up a monopoly to keep that price up.

That is the FIRST agreement of modern thought. Here is the second:

While the people of oil producing countries have not had anything to do with oil production or value, countries where living standards are high BECAUSE of the citizens of the country have no right whatever to any of the benefits they have produced. Mexicans pour into the United States because Mexicans are lousy citizens of Mexico. They have made a disaster of their own country, so they seek “opportunities” in the United States.

Why does the United States provide these “opportunities but Mexico doesn’t. There is one reason, and ONLY one reason: America is run by Americans and Mexico is run by Mexicans.

Ok, let’s hit the standard excuse, The US has more resources than Mexico. Japan has fewer resources than Mexico by far, and it has a standard of living comparable to America’s, though prices are out of sight. Exactly the same is true of every European country.

So people who happen to be born on oil-producing soil have aright to every dime’s worth of oil they happen to be born on top of. But people who MAKT their country better than another have no right whatsoever to the higher living standard in America. The third world has the right to the same “opportunities” which they had nothing to do with earning.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments