Archive for January 31st, 2007

Women are Different From Men

OK, that’s not a profound statement.

But as I tell people, “I don’t know anything about sex. I was MARRIED.” So I have little to tell you about women as a sex. But there is something about women as WRITERS that fascinates me.

Women writers tend to fall in love with the male characters they create. Agatha Christie was very upset with the fact that Hercule Poirot became so popular. I quote her word for word, “I wouldn’t have minded if I had made him HANDSOMER.”

Anne Rice admitted that she fell in love with her character The Vampire LeStat. If you read Inglis Fletcher’s books, you will see that she was in love with Duke Roger. Colleen McCollough was so in love with her version of Julius Caesar that it is almost embarrassing to read it.

Which probably explains why a really good female writer is the best possible read in these genre. No man can throw his whole being into fiction the way a woman can.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

Welcome to the Aristocracy, Dave, You Poor Bastard!

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I used to stand at the freeway overpass watching 16 lanes of traffic while asking myself what allows this enormous similitude of behavior, this sincerity, so wholly unexamined?
It is not a lightweight question for the wholesale absence of personal autonomy in the general public is fraught with many issues not the least of which are those rare souls who for whatever reason lift themselves from their immersion to the competences of power.
My practice is to ask who is it that pulls to side of the freeway, abandons his car and job, leaps the freeway fence, never to be seen again floating in the cataract?
But I also demand that he repair the damage to his abandoned spouse and orphaned children for this sincerity, this unexamined sincerity that undergirds the behavior of entire societies is not something lightweight and trivial, it is profound, having to do with the most basic issues of human obligations, existence, and spines of decency.
Sociopaths leverage this truth actually glorying in their cynicism as though there was something clever in taking advantage of the most fundamental goodness in ordinary people. Accordingly, the sociopath knows nothing of the whole of the truth of what it means to knuckle under to the party line.
Nevertheless, I say either things are true or they are not, and either whites are superior or they are not, party lines notwithstanding.
I also say we whites are superior. And that is why I to am an optimist.

ME:

Lord, Dave, that is the sort of statement I dream about.

EXPAND on what you have said here.

Don’t EXPAND, EXTEND on your logic, on your points.

“It is not a lightweight question for the wholesale absence of personal autonomy in the general public is fraught with many issues not the least of which are those rare souls who for whatever reason lift themselves from their immersion to the competences of power. “

OK. Your mind moves VERY fast. You want the reader to do the work. Me, too. I keep begging for people like you, but it ain’t gonna happen.

Dave, you THINK you know what you meant in that paragraph, but you don’t until you have explained it slowly, which is WORK.

Lord, it is wonderful to deal with a REAL student, someone on MY level!

That jammed-up statement is the way I used to write. Fast minds do that, and we HATE details. Why can’t other people just figure out what we are saying?

They don’t. Live with it.

You will have to explain what you are saying in detail. Others can’t do it. Period.

Other people can’t do it because they aren’t US. It’s called aristocracy. The burdens are massive. My reward for doing this is knowing that only I can do this for the only REAL people on earth.

Neither you nor I could have invented the wheel, developed the calculus or made the computer code we are using right now. Dave, you and I are not ABOVE our fellow whites only in that we are their leaders, the only ones who can explain WHO we are. Among the only real humans on this planet, we have a particular calling, to explain to whites who we whites are.

Whites are not just the BEST among competitors. That is white supremacy. White supremacy means we won some sort of competition with other races.

No way. My position is that Whites are the ONLY.

Without whites, “humans” are a high form of insect. They go nowhere.

FOREVER.

“Nevertheless, I say either things are true or they are not, and either whites are superior or they are not, party lines notwithstanding.”

“I also say we whites are superior. And that is why I to am an optimist.”

Poetic, but incomplete.

Everybody goes with the flow of traffic, but you say that if someone pulls to the side that choice is not justified by his defiance. He must explain the COST of that decision to his own family, to others.

So when you and I see a bumper stickers that say “Defy Authority,” we know very well that what it means is, “Defy all authority that is not Politically Correct.” It is the old 1960s hippie crap, “Professors should rule the world NOW.”

You can’t just leave all that to a couple of enigmatic sentence at the end. I’ll call you on it.

While others groan and bitch about policies or whatever, our job is the one only you and I can do:

I am not a white supremacist. I am a white ONLY.

THAT is what you must speak for. A quick, crowded statement won’t do it.

Nothing is easier than EXTENDING opinions. You just add more opinions. You just say that you are right and Franklin Roosevelt was a meanie. Respectable conservative make a living that way. But the Buckleys and the O’Reillys have already cornered that market.

You must do an entirely different thing. You must extend your logic, you must make it work as a world view.

What you say here makes me very, very happy. It needs WORK. You could write several books expanding on what you said, but all I want you to do is to do the mental WORK you are right now dreading.

Expand, specify.

Dave, you and I have a vocation. Welcome to the club, you poor bastard.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Shari, Welcome to Valley Forge!

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Well, I’m not pessimistic. But after feeling dull as dishwater for so many years I just want to feel absolutely YIPPIE! before I die. To laugh out loud! I would like to see some things happen very very quickly, not filter down.
Comment by shari

ME:

Shari has put her finger on the most important weapon in the enemy arsenal. No one DARES come out openly on our side. That was the main obstacle to the obvious coalition f Wallace voters and conservative Republicans who got 57% of the vote in 1968. Republicans ignored this chance for victory, staying middle of the road, until the Reagan landslide of 1980.

I spent YEARS convincing Republicans to abandon their pursuit of the “Negro” vote, which sounds as insane today as it sounded to me then. But at every Republican get-together, they always had to say they’d get the “Negroes/blacks/minorities.”

Why did they do this? Because everybody, from the news media to their local paper to political experts to those who screamed “racist” at them, insisted that they were not naziwhowatnedtokillsixmillionjews, and they were interested in minorities.

They said, as Bush does today, that minorities were basically conservative, but every time they talked about their “big tent” platform, everything they put in to appeal to minorities was straight leftism.

I am going all the way around my elbow to get to my thumb here, but you must understand HOW they did this. Remember, Wallace and Nixon got 57% of the vote in 1968. At one time the ruling Democrats were down to 29% in the polls! Almost every single one of the voters who came back from Wallace went to the Democrats at the last minute.

So if you could do simple arithmetic, it was obvious that the Wallace Democrats, since 1980 labeled the Reagan Democrats, were the key to victory. So how in heaven’s name did they keep Republicans on this stupid course of moderation and always losing?

Shari put her finger on it. The media and the yuppies simply did not ALLOW any arithmetic in the equation. They kept the Jerry Fords up there drooling, “The votes are in the middle of the road.” And “We need an INCLUSIVE party.” “Inclusion” meant excluding white workers, b but we were never ALLOWED to say that.

Shari, this is MORAL warfare. I was as silenced about this as I am about race. They control the MORALE. That is why I finger respectable conservatives as our worst enemies. That is why I want DEFEATISTS to go commit Seppuku.

Yes, defeatists, you are the best friend our enemies have, you are part of their weapon.

KILL YOURSELF before you spread your anthrax-like disease.

Shari is NOT a defeatist, so I forbid her to send me a note saying I am talking about her. I am sure Shari will obey me just as faithfully as other women do.

But what Shari has done here is what commenters do: She has drawn our attention to a very important point. We will ALWAYS feel isolated. In fact, our special value is in this period when others ARE demoralized. Anybody can join the torchlight parade or get out in the streets with tens of thousands of others when we smell victory.

My life has been worthwhile because I have always marched to the words someone wrote a long time ago:

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.”

My life has been one long Valley Forge. And if that is not a brag that makes one’s life worth while, I do not know what is.

Make or break is Valley Forge, Shari. And you are here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments