An unknown voice speaking as Peter delivers the following comment:
“It would be more to the point to suggest that you were ATTEMPTING to deprogram a cult.”
This was in response to Simmons’s comment that we are deprogramming a cult when we deal with Political Correctness. Now whoever said this would have said the same thing if neither Simmons nor I had never been born. There is always somebody who wants to sound profound by saying, “Ah, but the forces against us are POWERFUL!”
This is supposed to be the profound and MASCULINE voice in our conversation, “Boy, what you don’t realize is that it’s a hard, hard world out there.” It is the surrender motto perfected by the Masturbation Generation. Their sergeant taught them you can’t fight City Hall. So a real, tough experienced man shows his manhood by giving up.
Oddly enough, I have some nodding acquaintance with the world outside this room. I will even go so far as to suggest that everyone in this blog is aware that the forces against us are pretty substantial, though this ten millionth reminder of it cannot be anything but impressive.
I am deeply impressed. I am so deeply impressed I think I’ll go puke before I finish this piece.
Not denying the enormity of Wisdom behind all the thousands of Basso Profundos I’ve heard, I might suggest that it comes at a cost to the heroic masculine experience and wisdom soaked being who utters it. That cost is that he hasn’t listened to anything anybody outside PC has said since 1945.
If Mister Masculine Experience had read this blog, he would have seen example after example after example of the steady deprogramming going on. He may even have heard that it took decades for this deprogramming at the top to filer down. The lag time in this day of the internet is down considerably, but Basso Profundo is not aware there IS a lag time, so this is a note to others.
All of the icons of my youth are falling at the top levels. Equal innate racial IQ was at the top of the list as unquestionable. It’s gone now. Ex Oriente Lux, the absolute basis of History 101 in my youth, is gone now. The Holocaust is more and more seen as questionable history with teeth. The idea that the program of “anti-racism” is simply anti-white genocide sells like hotcakes because it’s true. It always was, but it seemed too far-fetched in the segregation days.
I just did a piece on whites’ right to discriminate. In my youth, this could not be sold. But by opening up reparations at their peak of power, minorities have opened up the question of who is owed what, which is one they would not DARE have discussed in my youth, even with Ex Oriente Lux in power, which gave all the white man’s credit to the Middle East. But TODAY the logic of reparations takes us back to logic, that a white skin is a far more just ticket to privilege than the name Kennedy or Rockefeller.
But Basso Profundo noted none of this. Basso Profundo was one of those waiting to say what he would have said had I never been born.
#1 by Alan on 02/15/2007 - 3:39 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Political Correctness relys on intimidation and verbal recrimination to protect its myth of absolute invicibility and power. Also, the media promotes the PC talking points and the goverment enables PC by passing laws that provide advantadges to less productive and predominantly non white citizens, its all so phony. PC is like a subsidised commodity, it can not compete in a free market so, PC is proped up to prevent it from dying and its dumped on society, it is a fad that nobody wanted.
#2 by Anonymous on 02/15/2007 - 3:54 pm
First of all we need to face some facts. Political Correctness is not a cult. That’s for starters.
There is nothing profound about what I said. I merely stated that you were ATTEMPTING to accomplish something and then I went on to say that you have failed to achieve your goal. I said nothing about how powerful or lacking in power your “enemy” was or is. However, given my conclusion I think it could properly be assumed that your “enemy,” who is still on top of his game, is more powerful than you. As Jack Webb would say in his portrayal of “Sargeant Friday,” “just the facts, Ma’am.” That’s all we’re looking for here, is it not? The facts? Or is this just some kind of dream world we’re living in? Some world where we claim to have a victory which we haven’t even come close to attaining?
ATTEMPTING. That’s the key word.
Cult? It doesn’t exist. “Political Correctness” has existed in other countries at one time or another and who called it a cult?
Looking at the facts has nothing to do with surrender. There’s a difference between “giving up” and employing the correct methods of warfare. Check with the Founding Fathers on this. They have something to tell you.
The fact is that you don’t know what the many Basso Profundos that have come your way have absorbed in terms of knowledge and wisdom. You merely and incorrectly ASSUME what your correspondents have learned.
Basso Profundo looks at the facts and is not led astray by the chest-beating of failures. The overwhelming majority of young people in this country have been successfully programmed and they are not about to be “deprogrammed” any time soon.
If the icons of your youth have been falling by the wayside dare I ask what it is that they have been replaced with? Are we in America more “conservative” today or could it be that conservatism is dead having been replaced with some kind of oppression even worse than the icons that you speak of could have brought you?
Whether you, Sir, were born or never born cannot and will not negate the reality that we live in here in the USA. What you claim to be true I find to be not true. Show me some proof. Why isn’t this 1950 all over again? What victory are you talking about? What month is this anyway?
#3 by Elizabeth on 02/15/2007 - 4:05 pm
Blacks owned slaves. It’s right there in the U.S. censuses (1790-1860). The
usual cop-out is “He (or she) owned __ slaves because they were relatives.”
Maybe that was true…like a single digit percentage of the time.
I was very intrigued when I saw something on Stonehenge recently and
the narrator noted in passing that workmen’s villages dated from around
the time of construction, which was (narrator) about the same time as the
pyramids in Egypt…. Quite a change from the hackneyed 1500 B.C. Ex Oriente
Lux assigned date…And the Bulgarians have been doing a terrific job about
getting the word out on their web sites about those early dates of recent finds
in their territory.
#4 by Pain on 02/15/2007 - 7:21 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“Their sergeant taught them you can’t fight City Hall. So a real, tough experienced man shows his manhood by giving up.”
Because I am younger, I haven’t run into too many of the Sell It All generation. My grandfather didn’t go because he had a family and was a preacher. The few I’ve run into didn’t like to talk about their experiences. Generally they said yes they were in combat, no they didn’t want to talk about it. If asked if they were decorated, they said yes, but anyone could get a decoration.
I always found it frustrating that the ones I ran into weren’t like the stories I saw on TV.
Until a few days ago. Whooee. I had missed nothing all the years. I spoke to a man’s grandson who told me some of his stories, but I had already heard them before. On TV. In fact the stories sounded exactly like a TV show, down to the exact words used and the PC script about the poor segregated black folk and the Jews they rescued from the disaster shelters. My historian’s sniff meter read: “This man was a cook far back behind the lines.”
Why is it the ones with the real stories of bravery are trying to forget?
#5 by Pain on 02/15/2007 - 7:26 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I forgot to say, I think I know whom Bob meant when he talks about vets with tales of glitter and glory that giving in to everything.
#6 by Mark on 02/15/2007 - 7:52 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
You may wonder why I don’t comment on this blog very often like I used to. Truth is, I find you folks comical — yes, even you Bob.
While debating how to word the mantra, hardly anyone is using it I’m assuming here, but with the lack of feedback of how it’s being used, when, and where, makes this a no-brainer. It just plain aint being used.
Go on, comment you whiney-babies. Re-word the damn thing to death, and have your intellectual conversations all you want you Buckleyite-sounding do nothings. Little has changed and unless in the so-called pro-white movement. There are a thousand armchair generals endlessly “getting ready” for the next “big push” but the privates have all gone home to watch JewT.V. and wait for baseball season to return. I wonder how the white race every got anything done in the past. If genetics is responsible for our achievements you couldn’t prove it by watching you oh-so-smart pro-whites in action today.
Inactivity in action? Hell, I’d call it commotose babbling of the worst sort.
Mark
#7 by Peter on 02/16/2007 - 9:08 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
This is Richard posting from a different computer, so I’m Peter. Another great piece from Bob, he’s been on a roll recently.
Another thing that makes me laugh is the idea that antis are somehow ‘rebels’ or ‘antiestablishment’ when they’re the most corporate, establishment group of inadequates in the world. Thankfully a new generation is rising, familiar with the internet like we were familiar with comics and movies. And more importantly, familiar with the yawning gulf between what their teacher tells them about race and what they experience every day.
When I was a kid, we were indoctrinated from an early age that smoking was bad for us. Cartoons, TV programmes, magazines and classroom lectures beat the message into us from infancy. And what was the result? As soon as we hit puberty and wanted to show how cool we were, we started smoking.
Whatever the adult world forces on kids is automatically uncool. And nothing is forced on them more continually than the gospel of political correctness.
#8 by Simmons on 02/16/2007 - 1:39 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob mentions the “reparations” debate as an opening for his logic. Well the Afirmitave Action debate is another weak spot where Bob Logic can be inserted with full force and effect. My simple deduction is about asking “how do we tell who gets what?” taking the debate towards phenotype and genotype, our ground needless to say. I posed this over at AR’s site with yesterday’s 2/15/07 articles about black empowerment, but its about 50/50 that it goes over the moderators head and he instead posts the usual complaints as if Bob never existed posts.
#9 by Peter on 02/16/2007 - 2:39 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
That actually wasn’t me this time.
Al Parker
#10 by AFKAN on 02/16/2007 - 6:57 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
The Artist Formerly Known As Nobody replies to “Peter”:
Let’s review your analysis, step by step.
Peter wrote:
First of all we need to face some facts. Political Correctness is not a cult. That’s for starters.
in reply:
Functionally, “Political Correctness” IS a cult, in all functional manners.
Remember, among other elements, cult members may not question the cult Leadership, or the basic premises of the Cult.
The JEW-controlled Propasphere has replaced “republic” with the word “democracy,” and not ONE of the Greatest Generation – cult members, by and large – did anything about it.
When the 101st Airborne “escorted” the CHILDREN of the self-proclaimed “Greatest Generation” to forcibly integrate the public fool system AT BAYONET POINT, any thoughts that the self-proclaimed Greatest Generation were anything more than worker drones with pretty uniforms – gelding in the Hive, if you will – were dispelled – IF you could see that only a CULT could have parents stand by while their Posterity were marched – at BAYONET POINT – to filfill the CULT’s wishes.
If the words “Eloi” and “Morlocks” were lacking in clarity of definiton, the lack of clarity was dispelled.
And, at the end of the day, “Sergeant Fury” types not withstanding, when our soldiers dress in their pretty uniforms and claim to be ‘Warriors,” all I see are the Cult members, the Eloi, getting on bended knee to the Morlocks.
Peter wrote:
There is nothing profound about what I said. I merely stated that you were ATTEMPTING to accomplish something and then I went on to say that you have failed to achieve your goal. I said nothing about how powerful or lacking in power your “enemy” was or is. However, given my conclusion I think it could properly be assumed that your “enemy,” who is still on top of his game, is more powerful than you. As Jack Webb would say in his portrayal of “Sargeant Friday,” “just the facts, Ma’am.” That’s all we’re looking for here, is it not? The facts? Or is this just some kind of dream world we’re living in? Some world where we claim to have a victory which we haven’t even come close to attaining?
ATTEMPTING. That’s the key word.
Cult? It doesn’t exist. “Political Correctness” has existed in other countries at one time or another and who called it a cult?
in reply:
Our “goal” changes from each of us, doing what we can, where we are.
Clearly, Jesus was defeated by the tag team of Rome and Judaism; yet, Christianity is a world-wide religion, and Rome is a small city in a second rate European country.
We are in this for the long haul…
The Cult, as well, defeats so many because it has become so nebulous, so vague, so insubstantial, save for the fact that it virtually always wins. It wins because it controls the Minds of its followers, who all seem to have one characteristic, what Robert Kocher called OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANCE to the Adults of, and, Western Civilization.
We will never have their approval, any more than Christ could have the approval of Satan.
They do not seek our approval, by the way; only our obedience, today, and the ability to shape pur children’s Minds, tomorrow.
We don’t have to like it; we just have to do it.
Our Children will do it, like it, and hate us; this will break our hearts, and they will not care.
Their “goal” is simply to make all of us slaves to their materialistic conception of the world, with them in positions of leadership, by any means necessary.
Our goal is to (1) not accept their terms, and (2) Create Something Better to replace their models. That “Something Better’ is based on what Western Civilization SHOULD be, and what Christianity SHOULD be.
Peter wrote:
Looking at the facts has nothing to do with surrender. There’s a difference between “giving up” and employing the correct methods of warfare. Check with the Founding Fathers on this. They have something to tell you.
in reply:
The Founding Fathers would not accept what we have become; yet, their modes of “warfare” were only successful when they were supporting a Cultural Transformation – from Aristocracy to (Aristocratic) Republic, and from a foreign-controlled fiat currency to an organic fiat currency, for example.
They would have recognized that the Deep War, the Cultural War, is the one that is fought a day at a time, and the measure of those days is in generations.
The Conservatards have exactly NOTHING to show for FIFTY YEARS of fighting the battle chosen for them, by their implacable RACIAL Enemies.
Peter wrote:
The fact is that you don’t know what the many Basso Profundos that have come your way have absorbed in terms of knowledge and wisdom. You merely and incorrectly ASSUME what your correspondents have learned.
Basso Profundo looks at the facts and is not led astray by the chest-beating of failures. The overwhelming majority of young people in this country have been successfully programmed and they are not about to be “deprogrammed” any time soon.
in reply;
True, all too true.
The Generation That Follows THEM will look to THEIR failures, and ask what can be done; from that, they will go to What Is To Be Done?
We are trying to develop a new way of thinking, looking beneath the surface.
In the words of Savitri Devi, “They do nothing to compell others — nothing, at least, beyond certain limits, even if they live in the world. They know they cannot force the evolution of things, nor suppress the part played by Time in the lives of those who are still submitted to its iron law. Again, like the Sun, they shine. If the seed is alive, it will ripen sooner or later, never mind when, Violence would only help to produce an artificial growth. And if the seed be dead? Let it be! There are new seeds; new creations, for ever and ever. The people who live in eternity can wait.”
This is the Perspective we need; all we can do is what we can do; if the seeds fail, they will be there, ready for those who can accept them.
Peter wrote:
If the icons of your youth have been falling by the wayside dare I ask what it is that they have been replaced with? Are we in America more “conservative” today or could it be that conservatism is dead having been replaced with some kind of oppression even worse than the icons that you speak of could have brought you?
in reply:
The icons of our youth were Symbols manipulated to control our Minds; certainly no more, and usually, much less. How many people know the TRUE history of the Pledge of Allegiance, or the salute that was an organic part of it?
The SUBSTANCE of where these ideas came from all derive from OUR organic inheritances – FAMILY, RACE, and CULTURE.
THAT is what we have to restore, and we must create effective Forms for these Ideals to operate in.
Peter wrote:
Whether you, Sir, were born or never born cannot and will not negate the reality that we live in here in the USA. What you claim to be true I find to be not true. Show me some proof. Why isn’t this 1950 all over again? What victory are you talking about? What month is this anyway?
in reply:
1950 is gone, and it is gone forever.
The Foundational Principles are eternally true, and we must remove the perversions that have replaced them.
A useful work of “science-fiction” is “The Mind Parasites,” by Colin Wilson.
As for the Work in front of me, thanks to Bob’s Insights, it really does become clear:
Christianity is at the center of Western Civilization, and is the Spiritual Force that comples us to return to the stars. JUDAISM IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF CHRISTIANITY, and, to the extent that Western Civilization merges with JUDAISM, then, to PRECISELY that degree, the Waters of Life have been merged with poison.
And, we can DO SOMETHING about that.
Remember the words of God in the Bhagavad Gita to His Servant – “You have the rights to your labors, but not to the fruits thereof.”
All we can do is what we can do; if people are ready to accept what we have to offer, so much the better.
And, if they aren’t, we still will have done our DUTY to our Ancestors, and our Posterity.
#11 by Basso Profundo on 02/16/2007 - 8:23 pm
OK, Richard, you get to lose. Your position is that whatever kids get taught they automatically oppose as they become teenagers or beyond. Not so. The Bible says, “raise up a child in the way he should go and when he is old he will not depart from it.” Oh, yeah, it’s in there somewhere. I’m afraid that this indoctrination that the younguns are getting in the public schools and through the television set and so on will have much greater effect that you might surmise.
Basso Profundo
#12 by Basso Profundo on 02/16/2007 - 8:33 pm
To the artist formerly known as nobody all I can say is that you have your opinion. I’m glad to see that you are thinking. It looks as if you paid a good deal of attention to whatever it is I said. I’m really glad to see that you’re thinking. What gets under my skin is when people don’t think.
Basso Profundo
#13 by mderpelding on 02/16/2007 - 11:55 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Nothin’ is forever.
Life ain’t static.
Basso Continuuo…
Do you really know what we need to say as white people…
I hope your censors allow it.
Kiss My Ass!