Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Family, Race, Culture

Posted by Bob on March 2nd, 2007 under Coaching Session, Comment Responses


NO!

If you can’t stand up for race, don’t get in the fight. Respectable conservatives use “culture” and “family” as mantras to avoid race. Latins insist that they will welcome anybody into the family who speaks their language and gets a guy in a dress to wave his arms over the couple.

I say it as one who has been in this battle a long, long time:

Every time you find a smart little niche to hide race in, it comes back to bite you on the tail. You join a segregationist fundamentalist church and a few years later you find you are supporting nothing but fanatical Zionism.

Let the Tradition Values crowd draw their salaries and talk about “family,” including that sweet black boy the preacher married to their daughter and how cultured he is.

Let the neoconservatives, who see we already have enough coloreds here to get rid of whitey, lead their lucrative campaigns to end immigration.

There are few of us. And WE are about RACE.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Peter on 03/02/2007 - 1:28 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    Concentrate on RACE!

    When I argue the mantra on the internett I explain that whites have a birthrate about 1.2. And that means that we are losing about 40% each generation. (then it is pretty obvious to people what way our race is headed) And what we need, is to get more WHITE children. Not adopted non-whites and not mixed blood children. We need white children in order to preserve whites.

    And I say that I think every race has I right to exist, including the WHITE race.

    If somebody calls me a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, I ask them:

    You just condemnd me. If your aim is NOT to genocide the white race why is it that you condemn EVERYBODY who wants to preserve it?

    Take the “moral highground” (if that is a English word I can use) and accuse and condemn anti-racist of wanting to genocide the white race. Then they are in a bad position. Then they try to hide behind that they only want to have freedom of religion, human rights or something else.

    Then I ask them: If your aim is NOT to genocide the white race why is it that your arguments ALWAYS boils down to having more non-whites and fewer whites?

    Adelheim_

  2. #2 by Dave on 03/02/2007 - 2:03 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    I’m just floating this, because I think the conversation needs to move into a more advanced domain.

    Sometimes I feel that the whole trajectory that began with WWI has run its course.

    Before WWI there was a very clear sense that the nonwhite world and the world of the Jews was a PRIMITVE WORLD.

    It was understood that nonwhites (including Jews) were tethered to the world in a fundamentally different way, a primitive way, than they way whites are tethered to the world.

    I the 19th century it was clearly apprehended that the world of nonwhites was a world of ghosts and unseen forces that ran with the land and waters and of spirits of the dead residing in soils and tides.

    In the 19th century, whites understood HOW DEEPLY, HOW TRULY DEEPLY, nonwhites (including Jews) were submersed into a world of malevolent spirits and unseen forces and how their primitive tethering to the world shaped their response to life and everything about them.

    Before WWI, whites had a COPING STRATEGY in dealing with the primitivism of nonwhites and Jews: Accordingly, it was clearly understood THAT NONWHITES AND JEWS WERE PRIMITIVE.

    Somehow this knowledge disappeared in the trenches of WWI. After WWI, a popular pretense arose in the white world that Jews and nonwhites were capable of modernity.

    That was the forerunner of political correctness and a great blindness descended upon the white world. That blindness persists today as much in white nationalism as in neoconservativism. White nationalists and neoconservatives have exactly the same inability: Both factions cannot fathom that nonwhites are tethered to the world in a fundamentally different way, a primitive way, RACIALLY FOUNDED.

    THEY CANNOT SEE THROUGH THE “PRESENTING APPEARANCE” OF JEWS AND NONWHITES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT OF OUR TIMES TO SEE THEIR FUNDAMENTAL AND IRREDUCIBLE PRIMITIVISM FOR WHAT IT IS.

    Whites have long been singularly exposed to this primitivism, blinded by their own long modernity and the world wars.

    Accordingly, whites cannot see that the clever media manipulations of the Jews for what these manipulations really are: a form of “putting on magic” to an adversary according to the logic of a primitive mind that now is beyond the ken of whites to scope out (unlike in the 19th century).

    Or regarding Islam, for example in Mesopotamia, white nationalists and neoconservatives alike cannot fathom that the Mosques, Sunni and Shiite, their prayer rituals, etc., run WITH THE LAND and are about THEY VERY SOILS UPON WHICH THOSE MOSQUES SIT AND THE “SPIRITS” OF THE SOILS BENEATH THEM.

    Islam runs with the land, regardless of where the Moslem actually resides, and try getting the blinded white of any political persuasion to understand that. Good luck! You are going to get blank dumb stares back from someone who thinks you are crazy.

    And there you have our fundamental inability.

    Our can white people wake up to the fact that in the rising swamp of our nonwhite and Jew tsunami the real issue is their primitivism?

    We need to get our 19th century goggles back on!

    Other than to avail themselves of white technology, nonwhites and Jews are not going to become modern IN ANY GUISE.

    It is a fiction that is possible. If it were possible, the world would not be racial, and the world IS racial.

    Accordingly, I evaluate things by my very eyes and direct experience.

    For example, my community is now predominately nonwhite. I live and work among nonwhites including nonwhite Moslems every day. Gradually, I am becoming able to really understand them, Jew, nonwhite, Christian, and Moslem.

    THEY ARE PRIMITIVE, REGARDLESS OF APPEARANCES.

    THIS IS NOT A “MENTALITY”.

    INSTEAD, AT THE FUNDAMENTALLY RACIAL LEVEL, THEY ARE TETHERED TO THE WORLD DIFFERENTLY THAN OURSELVES.

    I experience this fact directly in my intercourse with them everyday and everyday I say to myself, “My god, I’m back in the 19th century!”

    Whites don’t need “white nationalism”. Instead, we need a COPING STRATEGY for dealing with the primitivism of Jews and nonwhites.

    Perhaps, “reservations” are the answer.

    Not old style “Indian reservations”, but a new system recognizing the irreducible primitivism of nonwhites, a sort of social “eco-sorting” of nonwhite people out into the structures appropriate to them and away from our structures.

    This could be done with nonwhites and Jews themselves having absolutely no understanding of what we are doing. We need to recognize that we, as whites, have a huge ambit of action available to us entirely outside the apprehension of our opponents.

    I’m just floating this, because I think the conversation needs to move into a more advanced domain.

    We need a COPING STRATEGY for the dark primitive world remains our enemy today, just as it way in the 19th century.

  3. #3 by Al Parker on 03/02/2007 - 2:42 pm

    “Every time you find a smart little niche to hide race in, it comes back to bite you on the tail. You join a segregationist fundamentalist church and a few years later you find you are supporting nothing but fanatical Zionism.”

    Can I get an ‘Amen’? That is quotable.

    Al Parker

  4. #4 by Peter on 03/03/2007 - 5:25 am

    DAVE: “We need to get our 19th century goggles back on!”

    It is not a matter of putting ON 19th century goggles. It is a matter of taking OFF the hazy, woefully distorted goggles of the Politically Correct Religion.

  5. #5 by Peter on 03/03/2007 - 5:26 am

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    DAVE: “We need to get our 19th century goggles back on!”

    It is not a matter of putting ON 19th century goggles. It is a matter of taking OFF the hazy, woefully distorted goggles of the Politically Correct Religion.

    Papillon

You must be logged in to post a comment.