——————————————————————————–
I heard that one before, and let it lay.
Why?
Because what you are saying is that, because you Googled it, genocide is OK.
Bob’s Mantra
” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty Ian
The Netherlands is the twenty-third most densely populated country in the world. The 16,491,461 Dutchmen and women are concentrated on an area of 41,526 km²; this means that the country has a population density of 393/km²482/km² if only the land area, 33,883 km², is counted.
“In December 2002, Taiwan’s population density was 622 persons per square kilometer, making it the second highest in the world after Bangladesh.”
Ok, I haven’t been to either country, but I checked this out because a mate of mine works in Taiwan and had said how crowded it is – so are the rest of your facts as reliable as this one?
#1 by Anonymous on 04/06/2007 - 11:49 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Monaco has the highest world population density at 23,660 people per sq. km and it’s a white country. Also, the channel nations have higher pop. densities than Taiwan.
#2 by Al Parker on 04/06/2007 - 11:53 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
One thing I would want to expand on is the differences between pro-whites, anti-racists, and non-racists.
Pro-Whites and anti-Racists are very similar, as Bob noted, since what they discuss the same things but have polar opposite views. We already know that anti-racists are in reality anti-White. They would lament population displacements in non-white countries but almost cheer massive immigration into white countries.
I think that for their similarity it would be far easier to convert an anti-White to a pro-White than a non-racist to a pro-White. Why? To illustrate, I remember Dr. Duke mentioned that it was reported to be easier to convert a Communist into a National Socialist than a Conservative to a National Socialist in Germany before the war. After the war, it was easier to convert a National Socialist to a Communist than a liberal to a Communist. Commies and Nazis just have more in common.
What about non-racists? Well, recently, everyone vanished in a comments section when I noted that “White women prefer white men” could be just as easily replaced with “White women prefer tall men or well-coiffed men” without changing the general theme of the study. That is an observation did not come to me immediately because it is one a non-racist would make. Bob claimed that the study implied racial disloyalty. Like anti-racists/anti-Whites, it’s always about race.
Non-racists simply don’t understand what this “white” thing is about and it sounds silly to them. After being familiarized with the Cause, a non-racist might retort with a question like, “What if people who were big-and-tall claimed that big-and-tall people are marrying petite people in record numbers and they screamed that the future of the big-and-tall race is doomed if a homeland for big-and-tall people was not secured?” Its ridiculousness is similar because non-racists just don’t see their collected physical features as defining a race, ie: defining something important, a basis for exclusivity.
In conclusion, it’s probably easier to convert an anti-White into a pro-White than a non-racist to a pro-White.
Al Parker
#3 by mderpelding on 04/07/2007 - 10:48 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Quotes are mine…
“One thing I would want to expand on is the differences between pro-whites, anti-racists, and non-racists.”
Forty years ago, this statement would have elicited a giant “DUH” as a response.
Before that, the above would be considered incomprehensable.
There is no such thing as “racism”.