The perfect study of the kind of exchanges we should in web sites may be seen by reading Lord Nelson and Prometheus in action in:
Lord Nelson, using the Mantra, answered the usual question “What is the white race” by turning the Mantra around. He said that if you want the definition of white, look at the countries which liberal opinion insists have to take in massive third world immigraton.
We keep reading media comments about whether Eastern Europe is “ready for immigration” YET. Nobody takes it for granted that Japan or Taiwan must be getting “ready for immigration.” Africans could be saved from starvation by some of those hard-working, smart non-white immigrants everyody insists white coutnries are belssed with, but NOBODY says they must “prepare for emergration.
Like the Golden Rule, the Mantra does more than one job. The Golden Rule says to treat others as you would have them treat you. So how does this say you should treat yourself?
Lord Nelson has made what I am thirsting for. He has been begun to develop a LOGIC from our approach.
Lord Nelson is having fun, because when he plants the seed he goes back to a thread and stays on the tails of those who use ANY Mommy Professor line. And PLEASE don’t use the old line that “A lot of the groups ban me.” SOME ban you.
I don’t understand why this is brain surgery. If they ban you you can’t go back to them so don’t go back to those.
You do not go back to the ones that ban you. Use a little logic.
Where you don’t get banned, don’t fight everybody. Pick the replies that let YOU make OUR point.
#1 by Pain on 05/13/2007 - 9:10 pm
Nelson deftly solved that little problem!!!
—-
On another topic, Bob: I think the point your were making about culture is that if the people who create the culture are gone, then so is the culture. Where the old Roman Empire became brown, the Classical culture disappeared. At least that is what I told a couple people last night.
If this has little effect on the audience, then the person probably just adopted the culture argument because he is afraid of the word “race.” But if the person blinks a certain way, then just maybe you have planted in him a seed for thought.
—-
The two things I try to balance when I talk to someone are clinical observation of the person and feeling sympathy for him. If I am too clinical, then I lose the charisma that honest compassion gives me. If I am too sympathetic, then I may miss when a person really is a jerk.
#2 by Pain on 05/13/2007 - 9:31 pm
Culture is usually a canard. Some will talk about culture when they are frightened of the little word “race.”
People — the Race — are always more important than culture. People create culture. The culture has worth inasmuch as it fosters people.
Since culture is both creature and servant of the Race, then the Race is always the most important.
The Germans until 60 years ago were unusual in that they used culture not as a way to avoid talking about race, but as a way to point to race. For example, one favorite theme was to talk about soaring Gothic spires on cathedrals such as Köln’s as a manifestation of the aspiring Nordic soul. They found this same soaring spirit in towers of bridges and even in silos in the vast wheat fields of old California. In other words, they answered the question, “What does culture reveal about the people who made it?”
But most people here and now talk about culture as a way to run away from “race.”