Robert Kunstler ended his legal career trying to get a judge to declare open season on whites. He was defending the black guy who killed all those whites on the Long Island commuter train. If one of those whites had had a weapon, most of them would have lived, so the widow of one of them used her tragedy to go to Colorado and get elected to congress on a gun banning platform.
Meanwhile Kunstler tried to get the judge to declare a doctrine called “ Black Rage,” which meant that any black had a right to go nuts over what whites have done to blacks and kill as many as he wished.
Kunstler was, of course, a great advocate of Hate Laws, which would jail anyone for targeting any non-white, non-gentile group for violence. No one but me remembers that his last case was aimed at white gentiles.
Before you rush off to tell Stormfront he same thing for the thousandth time, you might give the above some thought. I just made some points on gun control and Hate Laws that represent Whitaker thinking, short, irrefutable, to the point.
And unused.
After DECADES, the point that if one innocent person in a slaughter had a gun there would have been no slaughter is, after over a quarter of a century, FINALLY becoming widespread. In earlier days, when my boss was on the Board of Directors of the NRA, we COULD NOY get that MENTIONED. The NRA said it would reinforce the stereotype that NRA wanted to give guns out in Kindergartens.
When Rosie said every country but America had strict gun laws, she repeated what everybody believes. Actually Switzerland REQUIRES its male population to be armed, and pistols are specified. They do not have noticeably more gun crimes than any other white country. But the NRA told me and AshBROOK that Switzerland was not our concern.
Rosie said she didn’t want to stop people from hunting. That was what the NRA based al its arguments for allowing people to have weapons for thirty years ago, that if a person wasn’t allowed to have pistol for self-defense he couldn’t HUNT. So Rosie accurately reflects the arguments she has HEARD. Respectable conservatives fight to prevent any others from being aired, and every crushing argument is detoured into the swamp.
So when Self-Hating White People (Thanks, commenters!) state accepted opinion, they are simply doing what Rosie does, and what respectable conservatives and most pro-whites help them do.
The fact that everybody knows, but nobody ever MENTIONS, is that SHWP cause more deaths every single day than all the racist hate-mongering since 1950 has. Kunstler said in court precisely what prevailing white opinion today IS: that everyone who is not a white gentile has an excellent REASON to kill any white gentile he sees. A judge would not ALLOW a white man, let alone a white LAWYER, to argue that in COURT.
Yawn! What is the Jewish Conspiracy dong these days?
Sorry to bore you any more, but SHWP ARE actually DOING what all those Hate Laws around the world THEORIZE about. They’re KILLING people!
OK, I’ll let you get back to moaning over low birth rates or something in a moment, but let me add one more argument you can actually USE before you die of boredom.
A billion dollars has been stolen. I find that I am living on several million dollars of that stolen money. Someone demands that I RETURN my money to the people it was STOLEN from. I say, “No. I’m USED to living on it and I justify my share of it by demanding that everybody who has any of that billion dollars give it back.”
Would a court allow me to KEEP my millions? Would a six-year-old child accept my excuse?
Of course not!
But SHWPs say that every day: “We stole America from the Indians.”
NO ONE ever asks that SHWP why he is HERE. If YOU are convinced you live on stolen property, YOUR first job is to GET OFF OF IT. But NO ONE, I mean NO ONE, shows the intelligence of a six-year-old child on this issue. If YPU believe America is stolen property, YOU have just said YOU should GET OUT.
NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OK, go back to your usual arguments.
#1 by lyulf on 07/01/2007 - 12:54 pm
Bob,
The evidence suggests that Europeans were here first:
“DNA lineage predominantly found in Europe got to the Great Lakes, 14,000 to 15,000 years ago”
“The first migration [from western Europe]was 20,000 to 30,000 years ago”
Douglas Wallace, Emory University
There’s a nice video about it at:
http:/shopping.discovery.com/product-59637.html
Tell ’em to put that in their pipe & smoke it.
Think it would help??? 😉
Lyluf
#2 by lyulf on 07/01/2007 - 1:13 pm
I agree with you about the “crime problem”.
Answer: Carry a gun!
By the way, the name of the DVD above is:
“Ice Age Columbus: Who Were the First Americans?”
Re. Get Out NOW!!!! Where would they go?? Who would want ’em??
Cheers,
Lyulf 🙂
#3 by shari on 07/01/2007 - 1:55 pm
Men stopped being armed some time ago as it really did seem superfluious, in many places, for protection. Plus, being armed is a RESPONSIBILITY. Few care for that! Now that it has become obvious that it really isn’t so superfluious, we find that pc thinking was growing like a weed. The county sheriff’s office is so beauracratized,and full of perks, that he fights against a concealed carry.
I don’t know how all this could have been avoided. Too much at once. The one thing I do see, is that all this is hatred of white people, western civilization, and to my mind, Christ Himself, as let’s face it, without us, any REAL christianity goes. It’s obvious to me that shwp ARE killing by way of sheer stupidity and they WILL
pay for it.
Nothing is new, but now is the time to wake-up. Accepted opinion is cracking up.
#4 by danerebor on 07/01/2007 - 1:59 pm
Change white opinions by modelling new ones for them. Don’t negotiate with self-hating whites, just state reality. They’re usually just parroting back mommy professor anyway. We must stop the, “Yes, but…”
If we don’t tell people what we really believe and want, then they won’t know what they really SHOULD believe and want. I think everyone really KNOWS this, deep inside at least. That’s why race is such a hot topic, especially with “anti-racists”. Heck, I used to listen to rap music until I ran into real black people in college and now look at me!
I loved Edgar Steele’s book Defensive Racism. But nowadays, he just talks about the threat of nuclear war and government conspiracies. How does that help US?
#5 by Dave on 07/01/2007 - 3:36 pm
Aldous Huxley and Juddu Krishnamturi become quite the items on the run up to WWII on the “I’m a pacifist and violence never solves anything” front.
After the event of WWII actually transpired and Huxley and Krishnamurti were left to explain a trajectory of horrors much beyond their considerable imaginations, given they personally witnessed the whole WWI shindig, Krishnamutri was left with this profundity: “Violence IS”.
He and Rosie would have hit it off well.
Huxley was more circumspect being thoroughly embarrassed: His strategy was like our Respective Conservatives; he just let his pre-war position slide down the memory hole.
I am always flummoxed that grown up human beings can actually be so dismissive about the role of weapons in human life to the point that they ascribed the whole thing to some sort of big misunderstanding that can be resolved by “more enlightened social policies and laws” and “correct thinking”.
It is THEIR STUPIDITY that is OUR PROBLEM and THEIR STUPIDITY extends to the whole of life, not just a portion of it, reaching out to every aspect of existence into fields having nothing to do with weapons, crime, or our inability to get along and be honest.
Accordingly, people like Krishnamutri and Rosie exist in the space between when the revolver is discharged to the time the bullet enters their ear, and it never occurs to them that there are serious issues of right and wrong and ignorance and sin transpiring in human life and that maybe firearms and EVERYTHING ELSE THAT IS GOING ON might have something to do with that.
Naw, it is all so easy with them and they are incapable of contemplating that any people who voluntarily relinquish their weapons get what they deserve, no exceptions ever. And it never occurs to them that is something very meaningful in THAT, in and of itself.
And if they were capable of such thoughts, they would have the beginnings of handle of what is really going on and we wouldn’t have the problem of THEIR EXISTENCE, a problem far more profound than any billion handguns loose on the street.
#6 by Prometheus on 07/01/2007 - 6:18 pm
Bob says :
After DECADES, the point that if one innocent person in a slaughter had a gun there would have been no slaughter is, after over a quarter of a century, FINALLY becoming widespread.
Prometheus says:
Which gets me thinking, will people who haven’t heard these arguments befor think they are NEW arguments?
Surely not.
Will this not beg the question then, WHY was this not brought up before?
#7 by Al Parker on 07/01/2007 - 7:03 pm
I second the comments about Edgar Steele. He went off in a bubble, it seems. The latest on his website is a call to buy guns, food and emergency supplies since he sees a 1929 around the corner. I fired off an e-mail to him to ask if he hasn’t lost sight of the vital issues.
#8 by Alan on 07/01/2007 - 10:56 pm
Maybe white gentiles are responsible for all the wonderful things we deprived black americans who’s ancestors still reside in Africa. Things that continue to in Africa like, slavery, famine, poverty, disease, ethnic warefare ( black on black) and corrupt goverment. Sure is sad these poor black folks here in cruel America are being deprived of these glorious and wonderful African traditions. Actually they do have there own version here in America, only differnece is us whites have to endure their violent and barbaric behavior and we are made to believe it is justified.
#9 by richard on 07/02/2007 - 8:22 am
Bob, it’s great to see you using the SHWP tag. For the first time, it means we put THEM on the defensive, forcing them to explain why they don’t advocate the genocide of the white ethnic group (I find ‘ethnic group’ works better than ‘race’).
It makes a refreshing change from seeing our side desperately trying to assure our enemies that they’re not racist really.
#10 by richard on 07/02/2007 - 8:23 am
It’s also very revealing that the thread you started on Stormfront’s Opposing Views board still hasn’t had any replies.
#11 by Simmons on 07/02/2007 - 10:26 am
The NRA comments are indicative of group think and its inevitable failures over time. It takes patience and a sense of humility to change the “collective will” (best term I can concoct at this time). But doing so can be fun since tripping up the pea brained peasants of any cult or beauracracy or religion since its fairly easy. I would have liked to been at a NRA board meeting at the time BW was there interjecting my questions and doubts about the old dogmas and watching the brain dead trip on their own mantras and predjudices.