Archive for July 10th, 2007

SysOp and Scimitar

“I remember when Jimmy Swaggart made a profund comment” –BW

A profound comment? Bob, wipe that smile off of your face. You had me going there for a minute until I remembered that you generally “consider the source” before you believe anything.

Swaggart makes Christian-hunting a barrel-shoot.

One good twist of logic deserves another I guess.

— SysOp

ME:

Note to Scimitar, OF COURSE I expect you to put BUGS as a link on your site! Also national salvation.

I don’t use SysOp’s comments much up here because they are not MINE. When someone says what I would say better than I do, I make them a part of my commentary UP HERE.

But SysOp is a thoughtful alternative to my stuff, using our kind of thought from a different point of view. COMMENTS are part of the blog. READ THE COMMENTS!

Swaggert made a profound comment in the same way children do. He certainly didn’t understand what he had just said, as the child doesn’t. He did not realize he was contradicting his own money-raising appeals to pro-lifers. If Hell is life, and everbody is going to Heaven or Hell anyway, why is preserving THIS life so precious?

If one just means “life” is a heart pumping, I am not pro-life. I am pro-LIVING. I am for Christ against Christianity and for living against pro-life. Extending misery is not pro-living, but it beats the hell out of tryng to THINK.

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is SIMPLE, but it is not EASY.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

DC

The list of states which did NOT have antimiscegenation laws keeps changing.
One quoted wikipedia entry said that “the future District of Columbia” had never passed such a law.

That “the future” was probably referring to the fact that it got BACK a local government only recently. It has been DC since congress created it. DC HAD a local government until 1883, when its charter was removed by Republicans because it was a pro-Southern and Democratic. One part of the Compromise of 1850 was to abolish the slave TRADE, certainly not slavery, in DC.

The local government set up, and the same congress that passed the fourteenth amendment funded, a SEGREGATED public school system. You BET they had and enforced an anti-miscegenation law.

Minnesota had SEGREGATED schools in 1909. The most unlikely states had laws like this, despite the fact that they had practically no blacks to enforce them on.

It is very hard to prove a negative, especially since practically nobody knows any history. Vermont probably did have one, since New Hampshire and Maine did.

Massachusetts abolished slavery about 1783, but abolished its anti-intermarriage law at the height of the Civil War in 1863. No one then challenged the right of a state to have one, and Lord knows who bothered to pass them back then in places like New Hampshire and Minnesota.

NO ONE then thought that prohibiting intermarriage was an imposition on ONE race. Which is why I keep pointing out that the idea that “We the People” included all races was simply a no-go to the REAL writers of the Constitution.

One reason for the “DUH-MEN Chorus” maybe that most people have not spent their lives battling these people and heard all their arguments a thousand times. In discussing Hell as just a poor “quality of life” I half-seriously apologized for using the term.

Back when I was working actively as an ally of pro-lifers, “quality of life” was the pro-choice slogan in defending foreign aid to pay for abortions.

Now commenters keep saying they never HEARD of it. I saw as CHRISTMAS special a couple of years ago where a guy form Christmas Future who looked Oriental said everybody looked like him in the future, a fusion of races.

Pat Robertson said intermarriage would ease our race problems just recently. “Assimilation” is the mantra of liberals and conservatives. Yet commenters keep telling me they never HEARD of such a thing! Antis will say it one day and deny it the next.

I’m too OLD to play this game! If you never HEARD of it, maybe that’s because someone who has been in this game forever has something to TEACH you.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Comments

Skype

I now have Skype back, but I need to test it out.

I will NOT use it much, as I HATE talking or IM’s.

In order to test the Skype, I need someone’s Skpe number, which brings up a separate point:

If you have a message to ME, and NOT on the BUGS Yahoo! Group, PLEASE put “NOT SPAM” on the TITLE. I get the BUGS Yahoo! Group, which so far has been only blog comments, and I have to pile through all the spam. So I only READ notes from people I know and check to be sure COMMENTOR’S names are attached to the Yahoo site, since I’ll see their comments on the blog.

SO, in order for me to READ what you say in BUGS or to me directly, I need you to put the old NO SPAM on it so I’ll check it out.

I would like to have a Skype number or two from you to try, mine out.

BUT when you send it, your title will have to have NO SPAM on it. And even after I try my Skype out, the ONLY way to be SURE I get a personal message will be an SF PM or an e-mail to my personal address WITH NO SPAM IN THE TITLE.

I have a cell phone and a land line, but I treat them as I will treat Skype, as something I HATE to check and I check messages seldom.

, NOT SPAM in the title, got it, gang?. When you get old, you have a right to be picky.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments