Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

A Lesson from SysOps

Posted by Bob on July 30th, 2007 under Coaching Session, How Things Work


When it comes to discussing women, most men spend their entire time trying to prove they are not homosexuals. Speaking for men, the humorist Lewis Grizzard said, “If I found out I had AIDS, the dying part would be my SECOND problem. What I really couldn’t stand would be all those guys telling each other, ‘I KNEW ole Grizzard was queer.’”

Not bloody likely. Grizzard was married four times and had to pay big time with each divorce. He finally said, “I don’t even bother to get married any more. Now I just find a woman I hate and buy her a house.”

As I’ve said, the Gay Lib line is that a man who can’t stand being suspected of being light in the loafers is a LATENT homosexual. As a propagandist, I think this is a stroke of genius, because you can’t argue against it. The DEFINITION of “latent” is that you don’t KNOW it, so there is no way that you can argue that you aren’t a “latent” ANYTHING.

I find it tiresome to hear men constantly talking about how they lost their virginity before they lost their umbilical chords, but it is more than tiresome when it gets in the way of serious business. And there is no more serious business than what WE are doing.

Being a woman is a lost art. Being a man DEALING with women is a lost art. These things, so critical to the survival of any species, have been lost in various forms of Wordism. Feminism has its Wordist explanations of how sexes should relate which amounts to saying women should COMPETE with men.

The other side looks at the Koran or the Old Testament for a Wordist guide to how men and women should relate. But our real guide is in our genes or given us by God DIRECTLY.

SysOps and I have been working together for years. I dedicated my first two books to my ex-wife who is still one of my best friends. When I ran my Oversight Unit on Capitol Hill I had to have an experienced woman as my Associate Director, which was a VERY high position on the Hill, where even receptionist is a hard job to get.

SysOps is not in my age group – few are, especially if you count the mileage as well as the years — but she has a LOT of hard-won experience. In action, she fits with me like a glove, and we accept our different belief system as a matter of course.

What is the FORMULA for this? That gets into Wordism, and there is no Whitakerism with a capital W. SysOps explains these things to women because, with the Wordist perversions out there that concentrate on them, she HAS to.

I just say to men, get off the “I’m not gay and I’ve had a thousand women” crap and get serious about learning the roles of the few intelligent, cult-resistant women there are. Otherwise we will stay an overwhelmingly male movement, and we NEED them.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by richard on 07/30/2007 - 9:33 am

    When we call an anti a ‘self-hating white person’, we’re using the same propaganda technique as gays who accuse others of latent homosexuality. The devil doesn’t always have the best tunes!

  2. #2 by Sys Op on 07/30/2007 - 1:58 pm

    Does that make me a latent homosexual anti… and self-hating at least every other 3rd Wednesday? I’m so confused. The wonderful southern ladies in my group will be too (after they stop laughing).

    newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty280.htm

    Their Own Stories: Ethnic Cleansing Of Americans
    “Last week, the column on Americans being ‘ethnically cleansed’ out of their own communities created an avalanche of mail. Isn’t it amazing that our government protects other countries from invasion, but betrays and openly invites displacement of our own citizens? … Read what more Americans say about being run out of their own communities. … During the fight, Nathan Corle said he heard the Hispanic males yelling ‘We’re going to teach white boys a lesson. White boys are going to die.’ Ethnic cleansing accelerates in America against Americans.”

    One of the main characters is recently married to a Filipino (like many others even here in the South) whom he immigrated for that purpose, and says that proves he is no bigot.

    Are you all including in your rhetoric that mixed-race couples must divorce, and children go with the non-white person? This is a very costly endeavor.

    I can and do based on the consistency of my religious beliefs. God has always required that. It makes sense every other way, but rarely do people stand for biology. It’s kinda hard to get a hold of. Offspring are not. It’s like global warming… if it needs to be true for PC, then you can find a 1000 professors and grant recipients to stand up and say that “the earth is warming, the earth is warning!”

    Thank you, Bob.

  3. #3 by Elizabeth on 07/30/2007 - 2:10 pm

    I’ve often been the only woman or one of the few women in an otherwise all-male group, so it’s not strange to me.

    I’ve never been out to COMPETE with MEN, just out to find a good opportunityfor making good use of my talents and experience, and especially to make an ADEQUATE living. I’d LOVE to be married and just have to worry about keeping a house clean and my husband fed and clothed — but I’ve never even been asked. I’ve had to paste phoney smiles on when I’ve been expected to congratulate a man on his mail-order bride, another woman on landing a man (when I know she’s a four-star “rhymes with witch”), and so forth.

    What REALLY hurts is getting the inane “You’re so lucky you’re not married” and/or “You’re so lucky you don’t have any children.” Most of the people who’ve said either or both to me are other women who are allegedly happily married and who are supposedly terrific mothers.

    I don’t see marriage as a parent-child relationship or as a master-slave relationship. I see it as a partnership formed with love and undertaken with mutual consideration and true conversation.

  4. #4 by Sys Op on 07/30/2007 - 2:54 pm

    Before… I didn’t care. It just wasn’t an issue, I wasn’t brought up in multi-race areas. But when I did, and even in a highly social setting I didn’t paste on smiles — I merely ignored the entire thing — most of those guys have been married before and could never interest another woman (this proven, not a catty comment).

    My non-reaction was subtly noted and it was interesting to see how the weeks following sorted out. WOW! did I indeed have some of those hard-won experience moments. Not only myself, but my friends and immediate relatives also. All done behind my back and in private converstation.

    Bob, isn’t it a wonderful sort of different satisfaction when they finally won’t approach you face to face anymore. It leaves the “uninitiated” scratching their heads and wondering why such “nice folks” are getting such treatment.

    Let me preface the next quote by saying that I never compare myself with the intellect and knowledge and perfection of Jesus (God). But He had a situation somewhat similar. After He threw the merchants and moneychangers out of the temple, and healed a lot of people pronouncing that their sins were forgiven, the political, but highly religious minority party of His day, the Pharisees, and chief priests, and elders approached Him in the temple on another occasion and asked: “By what authority do you do you do these things and who gave you this authority to do these things.?”

    Instead of answering directly He used the common practice of a learned man of those days and said: “I will also ask of you one question, and answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John [the Baptist] was it from heaven? or of men? answer me.”

    Here you have it! “And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say, Why then did you not believe him? But if we shall say, Of men; they feared the people: for all men counted John, that he was a prophet [of God] indeed. So they answered and said to Jesus, We cannot tell.” So Jesus refused to answer them. In front of a huge group of witnesses, who really did understand just what happened there.

    All of this and the internet are making silence really deafening. The stakes are just as high because the PC gods wield the power of the sword.

  5. #5 by shari on 07/30/2007 - 7:20 pm

    There are lots of thoughts I have here, but I might add something concerning ” lost arts.” I believe that we are the only ones that ever cultivated those arts in the first place. Whatever other races demonstrate of them, they learned from us. I hope, and I don’t think, those are ENTIRELY lost arts. Wouldn’t that be awful?

  6. #6 by Hardric on 07/31/2007 - 9:12 am

    I keep telling my family that we are latent millionaires, but don’t spend the money yet.

    Latent homosexual? That’s a good one. The person raising such issues should try to be a latent fool rather than an active fool.

  7. #7 by marwinsing on 08/03/2007 - 8:16 am

    Wordism says quite clearly DON’T trust your gut thus throwing the unsuspecting Mommy Professor off-balance but he won’t admit it to himself – rather believe THIS crap, being queer is COOL, it’s OKAY – like when Yuri said ideological subversion is both LEGAL and OVERT. Nonsense propaganda that the sheeple ACTUALLY BELIEVE and we’ve all fallen for it somewhere along the line.

    Us straights will always feel a tinge of slight discomfort coming from the gut in the presence of gays and dikes because it’s unnatural, it don’t work for us. Straight men get turned on by straight women and vice-versa period. That’s what’s nice about the skinhead culture. EVERYBODY’S STRAIGHT! Because if you’re not straight you’re not a skinhead. The infected Western culture forgot it’s origins because of these Wordism things.

You must be logged in to post a comment.