Archive for July, 2007
READ THE COMMENTS!!!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 07/29/2007
TWELVE of them, all GOOD!
I was reading the comments and nodding through each of them. They are none of them random, each one is what a seminar is all about.
You are making it more and more clear tome that we are deprogramming a cult, and we should tell people so.
If God can admit to being jealous, I guess I can too. I was disappointed when one comment dealt with Jehovah’s Witnesses but did not wind up with a sentence or two relating that to OUR mission. We need to practice staying on message here.
I would not have noticed this a year ago, but you are getting GOOD at this!
This is a busy day for me, but I’ll get to these great comments later.
I now get automatic feedback on when one of you hits the net with our message. I get the impression that, as Sarge says, a couple of us are doing the daily work and, as with all groups, most are not.
By the time I read the feedback, more than half the stuff has already been wiped by moderator, but at least a hundred people see it before they get to it.
AT LAST, we do not have to sit here and get infuriated as the media hit us without any way to respond. Every time you hit the net, you get a hundred of our enemies screaming for the moderator and boiling over WE are making THEM helpless!
If you have trouble doing it, tell us. US, what a wonderful word that is! Sarge, SysOps, Brain, Pain and the rest are here to urge you on with the energy I have spent up!
THIS IS THE TIME THAT COUNTS! NOBODY has EVER been n the cult’s tail the way WE are! And our message is growing. It seems slow to us, but historically, nobody who was not in a moment of sudden crisis has EVER had the effect we are having RIGHT NOW!
The cult doesn’t KNOW it’s a cult. So no one but us can know how much progress we are making. So you have to be your OWN cheerleader. Get yourself GOING!
Pavlovian Antis
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 07/28/2007
The former KGB man was discussing how easy it was to get Americans to the point where “You could SHOW them the Gulag, and they still wouldn’t believe in it.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaoX_SgNO70
I had a creepy experience of this.
In my Intelligence days, about 1970, I was crossing into a European Communists country, legally and openly for a change. I was on a bus and had noticed that a couple of middle-age hippies were on the bus. I was interested in how they would react to the border.
You see, ALL Communist countries had, at the least, cleared areas at the border with the skull and crossbones sign on them that said “minefields.” There were guards in sight with automatic weapons to shoot anyone who tried to escape.
The hippie creed in those Vietnam days was that if we were no different from Communists, it was because Communists were for Liberation. I wondered how that aged hippie couple would deal with the reality at the border.
I repeat, it was CREEPY! It was exactly like something out of a science fiction movie about the Pod People.
As we approached the border, both of them went into a coma. They stared straight ahead, not seeing the landmines, the guards, anything. They only came back to consciousness when the guard came on the bus to check our passports and the weapons and minefields were behind us.
A pure Pavlonian reaction! And I SAW it!
We kept asking pro-Communists, “If Communism is OK, why does EVERY Communist country have to KILL people who try to escape?” They twisted and they changed the subject, exactly like antis do here when we repeat the Mantra.
Pavlov’s antis simply cannot deal with this simple statement:
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org/
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
Shari, Elizabeth Has a Message for You
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 07/28/2007
Simmons — my caps
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 07/28/2007
At that point I ask that the anti slow down and explain exactly what they mean. Its simple, liberalism as practiced is the feminine mind seeking quick emotional relief, what I do is slow the process down let the contrary thoughts start to instill anxiety upon the cultist. EVERY ANTI IS A TARGET FOR INTERROGATION, not letting them run on the standards of liberal assumption that the cult relies on. This is fun much funner than having a screeching contest with the person.
Tim
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 07/28/2007
“First, Anne Coulter tells millions about the ongoing Genocide of our Race. Now Fjordman talks about WORDISM and dictatorship……not bad. ”
Speaking about ideas getting out there. Fjordman the European blogger/writer that the brought the world Islamic horror stories from Europe has just laid out a fascinating read. Fascinating considering he has been adopted by the Neocons and that makes him a bundle of contradictions on OUR RACE issue. But read below……it is MUST reading for BUGS readers/commentators.
“Alexander Boot, a Russian by birth, left for the West in the 1970s, only to discover that the West he was seeking was no longer there. Boot believes that democracy, or in the words of Abraham Lincoln, the government of the people, by the people and for the people, has been replaced by glossocracy, the government of the word, by the word and for the word.
Glossocracy can be traced back at least to the slogan of the French Revolution in 1789, “Freedom, equality, brotherhood.” As it turned out, this meant mass terror, martial law and authoritarian rule. The more meaningless the word, the more useful it is for glossocrats. This is why the notion of Multiculturalism has been so useful, since it sounds vaguely positive, but ambiguous and could be used to cover up vast changes implemented with little public debate. The impulse behind Political Correctness consists of twisting the language we use, enforcing new words or changing the meaning of old ones, turning them into “weapons of crowd control” by demonizing those who fail to comply with the new definitions. The European Union, a French-led enterprise, is currently the world’s pre-eminent and most unadulterated glossocracy.
According to Boot, a dictator whose power is based on bullets is afraid of bullets. A glossocrat whose power is based on words is afraid of words. The EU has drawn up guidelines advising government spokesmen to use “non-offensive” phrases when talking about terrorism. The word Jihad should preferably not be used at all, or should be explained as a misunderstood term meaning peaceful struggle against oneself. These recommendations are being implemented. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, in an attempt to avoid offending Muslims, in the summer of 2007 banned his ministers from mentioning “Muslim” and “terrorism” in the same breath, following attempted terror attacks staged by Muslims – including several medical doctors – in Glasgow and London.”
First, Anne Coulter tells millions about the ongoing Genocide of our Race. Now Fjordman talks about WORDISM and dictatorship……not bad.
Read the whole thing below. But lets savor this line:”the government of the word, by the word and for the word.”
I love Soviet Dissidents. They are our kind of people. We are White DISSIDENTS.
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2266
A Little Bit of Segregation?
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 07/27/2007
Someone mentioned a few white areas lasting. I started talking abut how whites were being chased down EVERYWHERE on WOL when it started in 1998.
So here is what I wrote in the antis section of Stormfront:
Bill O’Reilly has repeated a dozen times that nothing all-white should be allowed anywhere in the United States. Universities in Canada won’t even LET anybody DEBATE multiracialism.
The motto of antiism is, “There is no room for (white) racism ANYWHERE!!!”
Wherever two or more whites gather together, there will the antis be also.
But our innocent little antis all say, “Well, if whites want to be to themselves, let them.”
I almost NEVER use the word “lie.” I have found that anyone who says liar a lot cannot be trusted.
A lie is an INTENTIONAL untruth. I am not sure antis come up to that standard. They are so well programmed that they can say they do not advocate pushing immigration or interracial marriage and ten minutes later say that intermariage is the Final Solution to the “race problem,” by whch they mean the white problem. I’ve seen it happen on TV discussion shows repeatedly.
If a respectable conservative were to call attention to that, he would lose his “respectable” label AND HIS LIVELIHOOD. In Europe he might be arrested, and the prison sentence is automatic.
But our innocent little antis never see any of this, the way no one ever saw the KGB carry anybody out of the aparments at night.
It’s what the KGB man said. Anti thinking is so screwed up that they could SEE a concentratin camp and not believe in it until THEY were put in it:
YouTube – Just Doing His Job – draft
danerbor
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, History on 07/27/2007
Bob- can you expand on what you think total collapse would be like? How would it be different from a catastrophic breakdown?
ME:
This relates to a very big lesson in human thinking that I heard expressed in a documentary on the Kennedy assassination:
“People assume that big things cause big things.”
The idea that a little failure like Oswald could change history by shooting Kennedy, who became an Instant God at death, is simply unbelievable to human psychology. There had to be more to it.
It was assumed the Soviet Empire would last, literally, forever. The Soviet Empire was in science fiction books. No one believed it would just collapse because it was so SILLY.
In fact, the ONLY scenario anybody had of the USSR falling was Mutually Assured Destruction in action, total nuclear war: Only a BIG thing can cause a BIG thing.
NOBODY believed Reagan would take it out in one decade. EVERYBODY takes it for granted now. In fact, the media insist Reagan had nothing to do with it. They all knew it was on its way out anyway. That is the official line.
If Perot had been marginally less insane, the official line would be that everybody knew the two-party system was on the brink of collapse so, of course, President Perot was inevitable.
So the Revolution to overturn our present genocide against whites is now seen as the result of a titanic race war, whereas our revolution, here, will be seen as what was bound to happen soon.
Back to another blog rule:
“Why do people say things?”
Drama SELLS. Drama is exciting.
Screaming Conspiracy and blaming everything on an All-Knowing and all powerful Evil takes all the blame off of you and you have fun. It keeps you from doing what needs to be done, every day.
You can have all the thrills, all the money, all the fame, all the titles. We just want to rule the world.




woundednietzsche and a Tip From Me
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 07/28/2007
ME:
Great guidance but NEVER use the word “conspiracy.” It is part of THEIR arsenal.
“I do discuss race issues in the context of a larger conspiracy. ”
Use “part of the larger picture” or something, but NEVER “conspiracy.”
No Comments