This is not the kind of thing we should be paying big attention to, but southern and Southern are two completely different things. The most heavily populated region in the south is the Los Angeles area, which extends to the Mexican border.
The most southern state is Hawaii. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is to the south of ALL of them. Today, as sign of disrespect, south always starts with a small “s.” However it is understood to refer to the Old Confederacy.
The first civil rights triumph of blacks a hundred years ago was to make people write “Negro” instead of “negro.” No one would be allowed to write “negro” in a mainline publication today.
Hence the demotion of “South” to “south.”
William Buckley, of all people, agreed with me on this.
As several members of my family found out to their amazement, EVERYBODY who was a leader in the Reagan movement knows who I am. There was a cove article attacking me in National Review attacking and a review of both my books, one, at the same time another camp in NR was attacking me, entitled “Read This One!” by a Senior Editor.
I wrote articles and reviews for NR when I was still, albeit barely, respectable.
Bill Rusher, publisher of NR, wrote the Foreword to my first book and GAVE me a lifetime subscription to the magazine. In that Foreword, he had to distance himself from my criticism of his friend William Buckley in the book.
This took guts on Rusher’s part. Not only did I attack his employer in that book, I SPECIFICALLY demanded the preservation of the white race in it, probably the last mainline book that ever did so.
I once said to Rusher, “With all the attacks Buckley took for ‘God and Man at Yale,’ I doubt what I said bothered him much.”
Rusher disagreed. He said, “The man is only HUMAN, Bob.”
The point of this is that I wrote Buckley about the fact that referring to Old Confederacy attitudes as “southern” is just plain BAD SPELLING. He QUOTED me verbatim in his “Notes and Asides” column in National Review and then asked, “Are you kin to the Caleb Whitaker in Camden?” Buckley was raised in Camden, SC.
This puzzled me. Just to avoid me like the plague, every respectable conservative knows who I am, ESPECIALLY William Buckley. I even had run-ins with two of his brothers. Then I realized how much he agreed with my POINT. To quote me, he had to show he didn’t realize who I WAS.
Despicable though he’s become, Buckley’s a pro. And he REALLY doesn’t like the anti-South jag the guys he turned NR over to are on. Buckley knows no one but me would MAKE this point, so it was either act naïve or not mention it.
All this deduction also gives you an idea of what I mean when I say being a pro in this business requires considerable, hard-won, experience.
#1 by Bret Ludwig on 08/06/2007 - 8:14 pm
Just as Jews are gentiles in Utah, in South Florida you have to go north to be in the South.
I learned this from Gary Rossington, who was in several Southern rock bands, particulary-who’d think-the Rossington Collins Band.
Now when I was a rock music fan, I worshipped the Rolling Stones as the Rock Incarnate, the fountainhead of rock and roll. I had heard that Rossington Collins was the only rock band in history that ever turned down the offer to open for the Stones, but it was a conditional decline. They would open for Mick Et Cie., anywhere in the world except South Florida (where they had been offered the chance). There, they cordially would allow the Rolling Stones to open for them. They OWNED South Florida and there opened for no one ever. Not the Stones, not Johnny Cash, not Sinatra, not Jesus Christ Himself. Even if he brought Janis and Jimi with Him for the gig.
Of course the Stones declined to open for them there and in fact retracted the offer of an opening slot anywhere else-the Stones viewed themselves as the Hells Angels of rock groups, first among unequals everywhere. (Yes, I know all about Altamont.) Rossington explained the above, which was as I thought, and was quick to explain the difference between South Florida and anywhere else.
#2 by Mark on 08/06/2007 - 11:07 pm
Bob, forgive me for asking, but do they spell north with a capital “N”?
#3 by Bob on 08/06/2007 - 11:37 pm
Mark, I do normally spell it North, but ithas no identity except its enmity to the South.
#4 by Karl on 08/11/2007 - 5:20 pm
As for a ‘Northern Culture,’ you’ll find it has progressed to the point where even the most indoctrinated ‘I’m saving my country’ boys in blue would have gone home and shot Lincoln themselves if they even got a hint of what would be going on today. The Northern Culture of the war profiteers got to the common man about making a quick buck by selling out their beliefs on a national level and knowing that your immediate family would be alright (something that still goes on today, but it’s only a pipe dream thinking that anyone is safe).
It’s because of The Mess that we are in this mess today.
As a northerner, I find that Southern ideals and hospitality are far superior to the selloutness of the majority of people here.