Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!


Posted by Bob on January 18th, 2008 under History

I demand that no one on our side advocate violence. It’s stupid and it’s illegal.

There USED to be hit song, back in the 1940s, called “Watching All the Girls Go By.” It had this line in it:

“You can’t arrest a guy for what he’s THINKIN’!”

Actually, you can. That is to say, the difference between Murder One and the other sorts of killing is one of INTENT. Until recently, you couldn’t arrest a guy for what he’s thinking,” but even back then you could EXECUTE a guy for what he was thinking.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 denied federal funding to all school districts that did not INTEND to do their best to integrate their schools. Northern districts that had supported that Act because Southerners deserved punishment were astonished to discover that it applied to THEM, too. Boston and Cleveland, for example, got massive busing from it.

Every Southern segregationist was suddenly required bylaw to INTEND integration. Alan Alda played a senator in a movie where he heroically unmasked the fact that a Southern official before his committee, who had always been a segregationist, was STILL a segregationist, from a private conversation he had had.

If he had done this to a Communist, it would have been McCarthyism.

In 1950, Strom Thurmond ran against incumbent senator Olin Johnston. Johnston wanted federal aid to education, because SC was poor. Thurmond said federal aid would be used to integrate. Strom lost.

After the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, more and more Southern politicians had to publicly pro-integration. Their intent was everything. That is why so many changed their public stance so fast.

But we hear all those people in our movement bitching about “switching sides” who know nothing about that.

INTENT is wonderful mechanism for tyranny. George Orwell was a prophet of that school. In Europe we see scholars breaking into tears on the stand denying that they ever intended the facts that they discovered to challenge the holy figure of exactly six million Jews, not one less.

Strictly according to the law as written, the person who discovered that Madeleine Albright’s forebears who escaped the concentration camps by claiming not to be Jews had said “One less,” and should be prosecuted under German Law. William Buckley, who praises these laws, would probably be proud to be the one who demanded the extradition of these Thought Criminals.

Which brings us back to Intent.

If I make it clear, in what I will in this case call BOB’s Mantra***, that those who cooperate with genocide against MY race, deserve the same fate as Jews insist that someone who intended genocide against THEIR race – with Buckley and the Religious Right in the Amen Chorus – simply cannot be punished enough — my INTENT is obviously criminal under the rule of our established religion, Political Correctness.


“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

I deny what myintent is the same as William Buckley’s or that of the Religious Right. I am a good Christian. I FORGIVE my enemies.

You can believe me.

I was in politics, you know.

  1. #1 by Lord Nelson on 01/19/2008 - 1:36 pm

    This is why you are essential to BUGS I just PMed Truck_Roy so lets see what happens.

  2. #2 by Dave on 01/19/2008 - 12:56 pm

    If there ever is a badge of sovereignty, that badge is the right to judge. Only the naïve believe this has anything to do with justice.

    If you don’t believe that, you have never been in a courtroom or never participated in an officially sanctioned organization.

    Accordingly, the notion of “thought crimes” is far from literary.

    And I am always amused by fools who think that in a criminal court, your being assumed innocent means you get to tell your side of the story.

    Nevertheless, before you commit acts of political violence, ask yourself, how long a can a cat chase its tail?

    How long?

    The issue of representative government in America was decided when the voting franchise was universalized. Accordingly, it is a concluded matter.

    Why doesn’t this simple fact register with party intellectuals?

    For example, Libertarians cannot even see the irony of THEIR condemnation of the Neoconservatives, for that is certainly a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Both of these political parties are predicated on the same idiotic doctrine of the impossible dream of “representative government” in multiethnic and multiracial society.

    BW has pointed this out many times. I hope seminar participants have been listening.

    Face it, there are only two real alternatives in the multiracial and multiethnic milieu: imperialism or communism.

    That mainstream party intellectuals fail to apprehend this is a great asset to our side.

    Imperialism and communism stand in logical relation to each other, one is wholesome, patriotic, and muscular, the other is degenerate and immoral. Both are highly durable. Both wrap themselves in the “democratic” packaging of “representative government”. “Packaging” that currently refers to itself as the Democratic, Republican, and Libertarian parties in America.

    Imperialism and communism, the substantive governmental products of the multiracial and multiethnic milieu, are ying and yang couplings, given by nature.

    Party intellectuals, regardless of how they label themselves, mistake packaging for product. Packaging, calling itself “democracy” (e.g., representative government) hides imperial and communist substantive facts.

    And these substantive facts must hide from public view, for politicians, regardless of the substantive faction they represent, share a common careerist interest in hiding the general play of the real playing field. Their plays might reveal facts. Best to keep it under cover.

    That is the way power works multiracial and multiethnic society. Don’t let it upset you.

  3. #3 by Prometheus on 01/19/2008 - 6:32 pm

    Someone’s intent is part of what they are, part of thier persona.

    There are no bigger bigots on this planet that PC liberals who champ at the bit to jail someone, just for what they are.

  4. #4 by AFKAN on 01/19/2008 - 10:02 pm

    “Intent” seems to be the foundation of Positive Totalitarianism; it is not enough that you follow “The Law,” you must love the values of “The Leadership.”

    “Intent” is what “Political Correctness” really tries to control; if you can control that, everything else will follow.

    This is a trick the Jews use often to insure the “Intent” of their Racial Brethren is, well, politically correct: they will look at one another and say, “I don’t think you’re a Jew”

    Seen from the Outsider perspective, this is simply some bizarre little tribal ritual.

    Seen from the Insider perspective, this is a reminder that your Jewish identity – your identity as a member of the Jewish Race – is First, Foremost, Forever, and you should ALWAYS be seeing all issues in light of the critical foundation of your Identity, your membership in The Tribe.

    Incidentally, what do we suppose the “Intent” of the British Government is in giving the green light to the creation of human/hybrid creatures?

    I thought it would take a few centuries to transform Mankind with genetic engineering, and my focus was on the Elite applying this to their Posterity.

    It seems the replacement of Humanity as we know it can not come a moment too soon for certain people.

    Whatever comes out of the labs, it will look like Humanity, but will be truly soulless.

    Perhaps we can choose a name for such creations.

    “Goyim” sounds good, for some reason.

  5. #5 by mderpelding on 01/20/2008 - 12:12 am

    By whose intent are our communities being destroyed?

    By whose intent were our schools integrated?

    By whose intent were all those heinous race laws enacted?

    By whose intent do we have millions of non-white Hispanics replacing us?

    Jews of the diaspora and ignorant Africans?

    Yockey said that the purpose of politics was to define ones’ enemies.

    Your state of South Carolina was all ready 50% black by the time of the civil war.

    Your own people made themselves minorities in their own lands.

    Very pragmatic. Profit always trumps decency.

    Or family amongst HoNoR.

    HoNoR being the Holy Nordic Race.

    HoNoR has lot’s of intent. Pragmatic bunch.

    Negro’s and Jews are non-players here.

    But they make good “straw men’.

    Hillary Clinton is right.

    Martin Luther King was NOBODY.

    It took LBJ to really screw us.

    A great member of HoNoR.

  6. #6 by Simmons on 01/20/2008 - 12:41 pm

    Since the comments section is way out of sight I’ll post it here. At Taki’s online mag a Catholic wordist named Zmirak posted a wordist rebuke of “racists”, and I made a comment way down the list mentioning your name Bob. Hope you don’t mind? BTW the punditry of Zmirak was standard “intent” and of course latently white supremecist as only a befuddled white conservative/liberal can be.

  7. #7 by shari on 01/20/2008 - 12:54 pm

    The intent of Bugs is the survival of the white race, I believe. Not something else.

  8. #8 by richard on 01/21/2008 - 7:12 am

    If you Americans think you have it bad, here in Great Britain a ‘racist incident’ is defined by law as –

    “any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person”.

  9. #9 by Bob on 01/21/2008 - 11:38 am

    Simmons, thanks.

  10. #10 by Simmons on 01/21/2008 - 12:04 pm

    Well Bob I think you are about to witness the bottom rail finding a bit of militancy. By that I mean whites finding their voices as white men. Intent for the last fifty years has meant intimidation into egalitarianism and anti-white attitudes and even the zionists of the conservative persuasion are celebrating the end of the “Southern Strategy.” The white vote is in play and the politics about it are nasty as hell. “White trash” will be the buzzword for this election is my guess. Even the bigots at NRO are having a catfight over appealing to white voters. Its not written in stone yet and our elite might come together and enforce the dictat of never appealing to whites, but I have my doubts that the appeal of those votes won’t win out. So now finally whites can question the intent of those who ridiculed them for so long.

You must be logged in to post a comment.