It is almost a “game over” advantage when you really get a handle on the role Wordism in human affairs.

It is like those Hendrix lyrics. “Is this life or is this confusion?”

I have become amazed, as I have come to understand Wordism, how many intelligent people are drawn into its snare.

We are trained in the nuances of the word “cat”. We attend expensive coursework and become learned experts by studying tomes that are full of textured observations on the subject of “catness”. We then subject ourselves to examinations and confer diplomas and licenses upon ourselves certifying our expertise on “cat”.

But what we fail to do is look directly at that four-legged fury product of nature sitting on the window ledge and to think through the damn creature on our own.

If you can’t explain anything simply, you don’t have a handle on it.

But Wordism is “motivated” by those with a vested interest in confusion. This goes way beyond politics.

For example, Microsoft killed knowledge of data architecture (if Microsoft is anything, it is an educational institution and a heavy contributor to computer science programs) for the purpose of promoting the use of its proprietary database products.

Our society pays heavily for this for it is “motivated dereliction”, a vested interest in ignorance, promoted by the commercial self-interest of Microsoft.

Today, even the commissions of the regulators responsible for America’s accounting and auditing standards, under the authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission, are completely ignorant of data architecture, making accounting and auditing standards ineffective, unnecessarily expensive (to the delight of the big CPA firms), and misdirected. It’s a case of the blind leading the blind.

This suits the crooks just fine. Hence, we have a huge banking crises owing to out of control fraud and embezzlement and we have accounting and auditing “reforms” that have no hope of containing it, for there are too few people with any real knowledge of HOW to contain it.

See how it all relates?

You can’t tell who’s “beautiful” today without a scorecard.

We all know what it means when the first thing a person says when looking at a blond-black couple, “Oh, God! They will have such BEAUTIFUL children. I am getting an orgasm just THINKING about it!”

Since the first that occurs to EVERYBODY when they see a black with a blond is “ugly children” the first thing every respectable conservative says is that “they will have BEAUTIFUL bronze-colored children.”

This kind of “beauty” is called “exotic.” On the sitcom “Unhappily Ever After,” the sister and brother were talking about what words really mean. The boy said, “Like ‘exotic.”

“Yea,” said the girl, “It means ugly.”

EVERYBODY, in a SITCOM audience, knew what they were talking about.

And laughed.

Haille Berry, black woman in reasonable physical condition, is now officially “beautiful.”

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, Baywatch, with its Nordic lovelies in skimpy bathing suits, jumped to first place in the WORLD among TV shows. Then, on command, they started throwing in non-whites and declared them “beautiful and the show ceased to be with us.

South America, say respectable conservatives, is a place where the races are BEAUTIFULLY mixed. Especially Brazil.

Take a look at the people South American choose to look at on television. They range from blond to Nordic-featured with dark hair and light eyes. NO obvious mulattoes

In his novel 1984, Orwell said that the essence of freedom was the right to say two and two is four. You can tell Big Brother is watching when everybody rushes to agree that ugly is beautiful.