When it comes to negotiating for whites there is a reality:

Which, again, is so obvious that no one mentions it.

Everybody WANTS to be white.

That is why libertarians get short shrift. They argue that whites should have the same right to all-white communities that other races do their own communities. This never sells but that never stops them.

This nice-sounding argument is dismissed for a reason everyone knows but no one mentions. It is assumed that, if whites are allowed to separate, there wouldn’t be any whites who would choose to live outside their own communities.

Exactly that happened when busing was at its peak. There were not enough whites left after white flight to racially balance schools. In one famous faux pas, a black government official said that, “White children are a precious resource which must be distributed carefully.”

I don’t think I need to tell you about the storm that THAT piece of bare reality caused. It was the whole basis of busing, but it was also NEVER to be mentioned.

Bill O’Reilly with his education degree states the whole basis of the respectable position:

“There can be no all-white ANYTHING in America.” This assumes that all non-whites want to be white, and every non-white negotiator goes in with that assumption.

Once again, this is so obvious no one says it, exactly like the Mantra. Everything here interrelates, and this interrelates with the Mantra. There can be no white escapees AND WE ALL KNOW WHY.

ME:

It is very important to me when one of you adresses exactly what I was saying and extends on it.

That is the intellecual HELP I keep begging for.

DAVE:

AFKAN,

Your missing BW’s point here entirely. The Mexicans have not taken over.

I live in a community full of Mexicans. Rest assured by direct observation, they don’t have a pot to piss in. Literally.

That’s why they are camping out in our parks.

The message is balkanization. Look at it from the successful politicians perspective. Do you really think that our politicians aren’t aware that there is no public?

Concealing that fact is one of their greatest challenges. Go out and run for office. Find out for yourself.

Nobody has anything in common. Political dialog is fabricated by those paid to fabricate it.

Obama’s public coalition goes away the minute his paid volunteers leave their posts to await the next election cycle. It never really existed. It was an event hosted by the establishment. That means they paid for it. If the money didn’t flow nothing would have happened.

Our advantage lies in the fact that the establishment primarily public employee unions in one guise or another (and highly compensated executives) can’t buy what they really need.

This is the establishment’s primary problem.

Sarah Palin can’t hire BW to write the Mantra.

The Mantra doesn’t come into existence for pay.

All those posts I have compiled on NationalSalvation.net cannot come into existence for pay. That intellectual gold mine only exists on a volunteer basis, entirely unmotivated by electoral politics.

But goldmines like that determine the future.

They contain the seeds of what is really needed.

One of the outstanding characteristics of BUGS is that we do not keep flopping back into the past.

Prometheus and other commenters from yesterday made me think about this. It is almost impossible to get anybody to think in terms of what is developing NOW rather than trying to make everything today into a reconstruction of the past.

You know what I mean. No matter how much lip service others give to modern technology and how the world is different, the moment they relax they start talking about The Book That Will Change History.

Another example is how nobody but us lives in the age we are in. They keep rushing to the borders to keep the Mexicans out.

The Mexicans are HERE, gang!

Others are still living in an age when whites were the top group preserving its unique position. That keeps them on the defensive. As long as whites maintain this STRATEGIC view, they will face a united front of all other groups against them. Everybody tacitly accepts this view that whites have it and others want it, which was accurate enough in 1950.

So in 1950 pro-whites were conservative. As usual, my explanation is so obvious that everyone knows where I am going and agrees with it. Then they go right back to talking in old terms. This is a painful tome because I need you to go WITH me to the NEXT stage.

I need your intellectual HELP.

When I talk about “spokesmen for white people” it is an entirely different concept from what others mean. When I say “spokesmen for white people” I am NOT speaking of helping the white race as on the defensive in white-oriented society.

This conservative approach to speaking for the white race is Republicanism, and we all know where THAT is going. It sees the world as a two-sided battle between whites and their values in power and “the others.”

The Mexicans are HERE, gang! In a two-sided battle between whites and non-whites, simple arithmetic tells us the whites will lose. That is the story of politics today. We all see it, but I feel as if I’m the only political strategist who DEALS with it.

While Pat Buchanan, God bless his courageous soul, is stating the facts about political demography, Republicans, who are wailing about “the minority vote,” are saying exactly the same thing.

Here is my point which, as usual, is very obvious and absolutely impossible for anybody to stay with consistently, is this:

Republicanism deals with a world where there are two sides, conservative whites and “others.” Their whole hopeless emphasis is on converting some “others.” They do not divide the world racially, but by those who stand for “their” values and others.

Let me repeat: this is a TWO-SIDED fight. It is a two-sided fight that arithmetic tells EVERYBODY that Republicans will lose.

I will have to repeat this hundreds of times while people loll back into some version of the two-sided fight:

In a two-sided fight whites are weak and getting weaker. BUT WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.

WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.

WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.

When I talk about “white spokesmen” I am NOT talking about a future in which the fight is two-sided. As the group holding out in a citadel against the rest of the world, Republicans are in a hopeless position.

As spokesmen concerned with the survival of our RACE, one is in the position of speaking for what is still infinitely the most powerful group in a MULTI-SIDED struggle.

Everybody sees that the arithmetic is fatal, but nobody has any idea of changing the arithmetic itself.

The bottom line is this: If you go representing Values everybody sees it is a two-sided battle you will lose. If you go into a real world with different races unapologetically representing their own, the white spokesman can be enormously powerful.

Does anybody GET this? Is anybody capable of KEEPING that outlook?

Everybody

We are yet to see the real spokespeople for white people come forth, but soon some whites will start asking for one.

White Nationalists have it all wrong. The Stormfront view is that you’ve got to rally, and rally real hard to get white people to want to protect their interests. Self preservation wasn’t bred out of us, it’s just a lot of crap has gotten in the way.

The mantra cuts the crap.

People who engage in self-destructive vices will still fight for their life when the choice between life and death is stark. The mantra brings out the stark reality of PC, of “anti-racism” and tolerance.

Dave’s discussion of the tool we need causes me once more to refer to an oft-repeated theme I keep pushing:

The power of the future will be with those who become spokesmen FOR the white race. And by this I mean Mantra spokesmen. On the respectable right, the spokesman for the white race is a black man married to white woman who keeps being lauded by National Review for sponsoring Civil Rights Initiatives which outlaw affirmative action.

In the Movement there are many professional spokesmen who are AGAINST Jews or illegal aliens.

Both the respectable conservatives and the professional spokesmen in the Movement just keep losing. But they consider themselves legitimate spokesmen for whites against what they perceive as the attack on whites. They cannot take over white intellectual leadership because of their limitations, and their limitations go back to the basic point: “Why do people SAY things?”

As BUGS people WHO ARE DOING THEIR JOB know from EXPERIENCE the Mantra is a whole ‘nother animal. It separates us form respectable conservatives because we are talking about racial survival, not just safe attacks on targets that retain one’s respectability.

The Mantra uses another theme I keep hammering at: Saying something so obvious that no one notices it.

Movement professionals face the same problem Kennedy Assassination hype deals with. It is simply impossible for the average person to accept that a single Communist ex-military sharpshooter changed history. To LITERALLY sell it, you need for the story of the Big Event to be as massive as the event.

There was money in the conspiracy movie JFK. No one has ever even THOUGHT of making a movie about Lee Harvey Oswald’s life.

So no Movement Leader is going to settle for hitting the obvious fact that we are facing genocide. They have to have a complete Evil Scenario, a “JFK” of their own.

They have to sell BOOKS.

On the contrary, we at BUGS spend a lot of time trying to boil the short Mantra down even more. This sets us entirely aside from respectables who make their livings by never criticizing that fundamental tenet of our established religion, interracial marriage, and from professionals in the Movements who must sell BOOKS.

I am not criticizing our professionals. They did what they had to do to fight for our race. I made my living and my retirement by being a conservative pimp. Now that I am financially secure, I am doing what needs to be done THROUGH YOU. But a lifelong professional conservative pimp in no position to preach at David Duke or Jared Taylor on MORAL grounds. This is strictly strategy. It is a strategy I can NOW follow.

Once again, EVERYTHING HERE INTERRELATES. This goes back to one of the many short, OBVIOUS points I keep hammering you with, in this case, “Why do people SAY things?”

We have a special tool no official leader can afford. We don’t NEED to sell an exciting book and we don’t need respectability to make a living.

The Race Issue just took first place, in all realms of development, and no one – publicly – outside this blog seems to even both to care, much less try to understand.”

Nevertheless, the race issue shall remain in first place regardless.

There is great power that can be picked up fairly simply by ditching the kinds of words and phrases that circulate misunderstanding.

But saying this is no different than all those wanna be talents that have vision without the capability to execute at a practical level. For that a tool is needed and after all, tools are repositories of congealed intelligence. They are way of propagating intelligence while bypassing instruction.

So the future becomes a linear extrapolation simply because no one can imagine the tools that are destined to actually create it. It is a leap from the telegraph to the modern PC. With hindsight, the leap is perfectly logical. But no one in 1865 saw it.

In my work, I need a capability to animate the behavior of fluids in 3D in a structure of connected pipes and reservoirs and I am frustrated that the tool I want doesn’t exist (pragmatically speaking).

Now, if I were a genius in playing chess, perhaps I would not require this.

Tools are a whole lot more important than geniuses, geniuses being flat out hard to come by, and lacking the right tools and geniuses are the real reason the people who rule us continually screw up.

But nonwhites, generally and genetically speaking, cannot create the tool.

I discussed the piece on The Family Guy where the girl used the old hippie, “Only Man has wars,” and Death made an idiot of her, “What are you talking about? Animals kill each other all the time!”

Today the entire audience of Family Guy, including the YUPPIE college grads, know that border wars are routine and merciless among all social animals. It is a ruling theme in the wildly popular meerkat saga.

But in the 1960s, no one had any idea of this. Even the chimpanzee lady in Africa would then have SWORN that chimps did NOT patrol their borders and kill alien chimps who violated them. Now even the most brain-dead college grad knows it.

The problem is that people get only one lesson at a time. This is why a continuing theme here is “obsessing on examples.” Yes, the fact that all the experts were unbelievably wrong about war being only a man-made institution underlay all 1960s thought. Yes, that particular discovery made those particular hippies–Marxists–ideas laughable.

But there is a repeat of an old lesson here, one that no one EVER takes into account. It is more general than an obsession with taking The Latest Thing into account. It is that you must not build your world on ANY Latest Thing.

Which is why I keep hitting “News and Jews.” The lesson here is that there will be another Latest Thing that will make your present Latest Thing yesterday’s news. This is so obvious that no one SEES it.” Another theme I beat to death here.

PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS PREDICTING THE FUTURE BASED ON THE LATEST THING, BUT THEY NEVER TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FACT THAT THERE WILL BE MORE LATEST THINGS.

Back when I was still semi-respectable, I made this obvious point and was listened to. It was a generation ago when the discovery of early man’s predecessors was going full tilt. in reaction to Ardrey’s African Genesis. Each time a new, older predecessor was found, articles would say, “The earliest human ancestor has just been found at X,” and there would be cluster of Expert Opinions based on the Latest Thing fact that all mankind came from Spot X.

Everybody wanted to be The New Ardrey. His concept that man’s advance began with his dining a shinbone as a weapon began the hit movie 2001. It was all the rage. So each time a new discovery was made, it was supposed to rewrite the whole of human evolutionary history.

This happened over and over. It got comical.

Finally I pointed out in Science News that this was silly. After ten articles reporting “the earliest man,” any reasonably intelligent person would cut the crap and write about “the earliest ancestor SO FAR FOUND.”

I was astonished at the result. Those article not only changed in Science News, they changed in Time and US News and World Report! The whole phenomenon STOPPED. That is a lot of power for one person. The reason I exercised that power was that nobody but me even noticed it.

I have utilized this kind of power my whole life. We have this kind of power precisely because it is not a power anyone else WANTS. Outside of BUGS, people do not want power, they want to RECOGNIZED as the person who exercises power.

I have made fundamental changes at the top of the chain of ideas all my life. I have exercised more raw power than ANY expert in ANY field.

I had the field clear to exercise this power precisely because no one NOTICED it. No one but us BUGS types wants REAL power, which is the ability to change to change the ideas that make the world of the future. They do not want this power because it does not lead to fame or a full professorship or even a footnote in anybody’s book.

Which is why I keep repeating, “They can have the titles, they can have the money, they can have the fame. I just want to rule the world.”

I keep emphasizing the general point that all the frontline Movements are based on the Latest Thing, but nobody builds his world view around the fact that there will be NEW insights, NEW developments. No Movement, no professor, has even TRIED to build his world view on this most obvious of realities. If you don’t believe me, go back and look at the cries of articles in the1970s about “the earliest man has been found at …” and the whole New World views that were based on each one until my Science News bit appeared.

To understand this, you have to THINK about another point I keep making, “Why do people SAY things?”

I have been interviewed by a LOT of writers and I know what they want. The one time my picture was on the front page of the New York Times I got it there by practically writing the guys’ article for him. I knew EXACTLY the quotes a working newspaper writer needed and I had them ready. When he left my office, he was practically dancing on air.

With that experience, I can picture a writer doing an article on The Latest Scientific Discovery when I say, “the real lesson here is that MORE new discoveries will be made.” He would be on his way out the door.

This leads directly to another lesson I keep hammering at ’til you are sick of it: “Why do people SAY things?” A writer, whether he is writing for a scientific publication or the National Inquirer, needs quotes that emphasize the IMPORTANCE of the story he is trying to publish about The Latest Thing. Above all, he does NOT want someone putting his rave news into “perspective.”

Unless you understand “Why do people SAY things?” the idea that ten articles in a row said that, “It has just been discovered that man’s earliest ancestor was in…” seems incredible, not just coming from a science writer, but from any adult who is not actually retarded.

No one would have written what I wrote in Science News if he didn’t understand, “Why do people SAY things?” I wrote it because I understand that when people write silly things there is a reason for it, usually a reason that has nothing to do with Jews or some other obsession.

The lesson of “News and Jews” has nothing to do with news, and nothing to do with Jews.

That is the POINT.