This is a necessary prelude to what I write next.
Watch an Olympic dash. There are six men in it from all parts of the world from Sweden to Nigeria.
Every one of them is black. Every one of them is not only black, but PURE black.
On the opposite end of the scale from the dash, the winner of the Boston Marathon is normally not only black, but PURE black. The Olympic dash winners are from WEST Africa, the long distance winners are from EAST Africa.
In serious competition mulattoes need not apply.
In the one type of serious competition we can measure, there is simply no substitute for racial purity.
Is the black race the only one where TRUE diversity, the existence of different races, is essential? We have TWO cases of this among blacks.
During the Inquisition,”Christianity” came to mean it’s opposite. Today “diversity” means a single brown race.
Have we gone nuts the way Medieval Europe did? Is “diversity” the opposite of diversity in our present age of insanity?
In a truly diverse society, pure Orientals and even pure whites might have a place. Or are we so fanatical in our drive to stamp out all “Hitlerian” heresy that we have decided to make”diversity” mean its opposite?
#1 by Simmons on 12/17/2008 - 1:43 pm
Evolution marches on Politcal Correctness cements itself in place. Liberalism if there is such a thing today is status seeking first and foremost, there is literally nothing there, none of which can be explained beyond the level of a teenage girl’s intellectual pursuit, “like ya know.”
You are seeing a tree and calling it a forest. What you think they want to genocide the Victoria’s Secret catalog model’s.