This is a war of words. The use of WORDS is what matters.
I seem to be fighting a LONE battle against the use of the word “anti.” Anybody who works in OV sees how desperately they object when one says anti-WHITE, but I can’t get people to USE it.
In short, I am the same position with anti-WHITE as I am with the Mantra.
I am very glad to have Lord Nelson back.
I now have some real practitioners like him on the Mantra. It took YEARS to get them and I can’t spare one.
I find it hard to understand how people who claim to be serious simply cannot assimilate the importance of words that WORK.
“Anti-white” is more important and effective than five tomes on Jews.
Please get in there and correct our comrades on this and similar points.
And never, never, NEVER let them off the hook by saying “anti.”
#1 by Dave on 01/16/2009 - 4:33 pm
Getting our side to recognize the importance of this is really the WHOLE BATTLE.
Every distinct racial and ethnicity has an “exclusivity” that can be uniquely called.
This is why the Establishment of our multi-ethnic and multi-racial society is incapable of speaking with an AUTHENTIC VOICE.
It is heresy for them to resort to “calls” (appeals to identity) in a racially or ethnically distinct way. Hence their voice is inauthentic and they invariably have a loyalty problem with the public (the public is in fact disloyal, a fact the Establishment is compelled to deny).
The biggest problem the American Establishment has is that it has lost the loyalty (real and true loyalty – not pretended) of America’s white people. Don’t lose sight of the importance of this.
This is the Establishment’s biggest and most significant loss. And it is why their rhetoric sounds so hollow and phony. Not only that, they have no means to resort to anything authentic. Can’t be done when “keeping the peace” among all these races and ethnicities is priority number one for the Establishment.
So when we confront any white spouting the Establishment’s party line on race, we MUST label that person a traitor. That gets to the whole heart of the matter without any BS.
An anti-white white is a traitor. He or she has no loyalty to anything other than the corrupt Establishment. That is treason.
That is the mentality we must spread.
#2 by BoardAd on 01/16/2009 - 7:31 pm
To TheDude:
Bob wants to remind you to please take the time to reread the article as you have misunderstood what Bob plainly stated.
This says that YOU must never use the word or you have just excused everyone else by doing so.
#3 by BoardAd on 01/16/2009 - 7:57 pm
I see your confusion now, my applogies.
Bob wants to remind you not to shorten anti-white down to anti. Anti-white is a much more powerful label.
#4 by thedude on 01/16/2009 - 7:22 pm
In the beginning of the article you say your against the use of “anti”. Then at the end you say your not. Which was is it? I prefer “traitor” myself, but your point of using words is paramont.
Please clarify this. Thanks
The Dude
#5 by thedude on 01/16/2009 - 7:53 pm
Okay, Bob says, “I seem to be fighting a LONE battle against the use of the word “anti.”…..So he’s against it…Right?…
Then he says, ““Anti-white” is more important and effective than five tomes on Jews”, which indicates it’s important and hence usable.
Frankly, I prefer universal language amongst white nationalist, so which one is it, use or don’t?
#6 by thedude on 01/16/2009 - 8:08 pm
Got it….
Bob is great. I miss his rants on SF. He’s a good point man for the cause and I haven’t been here in a long time.
Thanks
The Dude
#7 by Simmons on 01/17/2009 - 12:50 am
Attack them then, don’t sit here and plead with us. Better still good cop/ bad cop them, put an attack dog on the poster using just “anti” and you save the day by suggesting firmly the use of “anti-white”. A combination of Heglian Dialectics, Chomsky theory and political theatre.
#8 by Bob on 01/17/2009 - 11:30 am
Dude, I am trying to get comrades to use the word “anti-WHITE” instead of “anti.”
Same with “traitor.” It must be “RACE traitor” or it is meaningless.
I watch them carefully, and they are still uncomfortable when “race traitor” is mentioned. “Traitor” means nothing.
#9 by bruce on 01/17/2009 - 2:03 pm
Your remark about peoples reluctance you use the term “RACE traitor” reminds me of a familiar quotation.
————————————–
Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.
#10 by thedude on 01/17/2009 - 3:26 pm
Got it. It’s like shooting for effect verses shooting to kill.
#11 by Tim on 01/17/2009 - 4:20 pm
Bob,
I do two things all the time. I got them both on BUGS from you. They are supposedly the most effective tools in my arsenal.
One, I never say anti-racism and just leave it alone. I always say “anti-racism is a code word for anti-white”. I then stay on anti-white. It rarely goes further anymore, because I have slaughtered people with one of my shortened mantras so many times.
Another thing stolen from you is MY RACE. I never ever say “the white race”. Always my race, my race, my race. I have had white folks tell me after that they had never heard anyone talk about our race and personalize so much. I have had Asians say that they had never heard a white person say MY RACE. Very difficult to attack. Once in a while you will get a smart arsed anti-white SHWA ask me what my race is. I always say White Folks and then I call them dumb asses.
When you say ‘the white race’. You will get endless dumb questions about WHAT is the WHITE RACE etc. No one has ever asked me all these side issue questions by me saying MY RACE. When they do. I can immediately make fun of them and call them names.
Bob, has anyone ever asked you what color you are? No, not likely. My race is your best underrated and understated BUGS tool. I catch people all the time on BUGS saying ‘the white race’. I let it slide. But I shouldn’t because it is THAT effective. Make “My Race” a habit and watch people.
just my 2cents on a snowed in Saturday.
#12 by Dave on 01/18/2009 - 12:42 pm
Tim’s point, which never occurred to me, is right on.
It is through powerful personal bearing that you avoid the shots of the enemy.
That is why wearing insignia, uniforms, permitting yourself to be associated with swastikas, with Hitler, with skinhead paraphernalia, or with extremism of any kind is so stupid.
You are simply doing the enemy a favor, making his job easy.
By heeding Tim’s advice we flip the whole process, forcing our enemies into their own hard to defend IDENTITY POLITICS posturing.
Let our enemies receive the charge that THEY are the extremists (which of course they are).
#13 by AFKANNow on 01/19/2009 - 12:36 am
My GOD, but I am getting to the point that I consider BUGS to be the MODERATE positions!
The words MUST be not merely “traitor,” because that allows a lot of time for people to think, but RACE TRAITOR.
The first time I heard that phrase used by a moderate sounding, educated voice, was by Dave Pringle on an old NA music show, after a short speech by Kevin Alfred Strom.
He said something like, “This song is dedicated to all of the cowards, and RACE TRAITORS among us.”
That phrase hit me like a sledgehammer, and got me “off the dime” in terms of racial thought, and, in time, action.
That’s the phrase I use with my Nephews all of the time, and I use it in its most positive sense – those that are not helping us build a better Tomorrow, based on a Positive Theory of Race.
That having been said, I notice that a lot more people do not look at me unusually if, while in line, I discuss the importance of Race as a social organizing principle.
“After all,” I say,”it certainly seems to have worked well for Obama, who got enough of the *pause for effect* Race Traitor vote to carry him over the top.”
NO ONE has argued with me, and a good many have nodded approvingly.
The Obama Presidency seems to be acting as a stone cold, third-and-long wake-up call.
Good.