Anti-whites are always spouting about how massive immigration and assimilation demanded of ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is just Freedom.
I am really ticked off at my comrades for NEVER telling the truth about this.
The same anti-white who spouts this libertarian nonsense knows very well that free speech does not apply to US, but I am STILL waiting for us to SAY so every time this crap appears.
They keep saying we can live in our own bunkers if we want to. Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, it is forbidden for us to do so.
But no one points this out.
As O’Reilly said, “There should be no all-white ANYTHING in America.”
At least O’Reilly SAYS it. That’s more than my comrades on SF do.
For all their “diversity” talk, the fact is that all-white areas are forbidden because people will MOVE there. If we had freedom of choice integration would be doomed in the long term.
That is the justification for our entire set of laws, the ones O’Reilly is all for and states so clearly. Why do my comrades let the anti-whites get away with this “Freedom” crap?
#1 by Pain on 01/26/2009 - 10:23 pm
How is genocide freedom?
Freedom to be slaughtered? Freedom to cease to exist?
How is that freedom?
If that is freedom, then all have freedom to kill the anti-white – in self-defense.
#2 by Dave on 01/26/2009 - 10:39 pm
In tyranny everything is politicized. Prisoners don’t have the option of resigning from being prisoners and we don’t have the option of evading niggers and Mexicans on our doorsteps. Just keep in mind for most part they are prisoners too.
The Establishment’s standard operating procedure of inciting force against the public is a sign they have grown stupid.
Their behavior puts more competent players in power for inciting the use of and reliance on coercive force is a crude method of coping with an inherently insecure world. It is pure fantasy to think otherwise.
I love to listen to those inciting force, a favorite pastime of the Establishment and their intellectuals. They hand me a revelation of how vulnerable they are to intimidation. Anybody who has graduated from a bully system knows this.
And what mainly passes for politics is stuff that transpires at the bully system level. The Establishment’s pussies routinely deny it and a big piece of their Wordist ideology is about this denial.
That is why Robert Whitaker’s statement that this is no longer a two-sided fight is so meaningful.
It is a multilateral fight that advantages our race greatly, given that so many alliances are begging to be organized.
#3 by Prometheus on 01/27/2009 - 1:45 am
“You’re free to create your own white nation. But we will fight you to allow ANYONE who wants to move there, freedom to do so”
Thats the freedom they stand for.
#4 by shari on 01/27/2009 - 8:49 am
This is an attempt to justify genocide. When I was told that to oppose “the right to fall in love and marry whoever you want” was totalitarian, I said “you are justifying GENOCIDE.” They try to use OUR FREEDOM against us.
#5 by Simmons on 01/28/2009 - 12:02 pm
What all this is saying is that “White” is dear, precious and valuable, to cover all synonyms. But to cover this up we invent Wordism, and PC the religion that restricts what words are said.
Obama probably increased the value of “White” with that addition of white into his blood, thanks to his feckless stupid mother who really hated evolution.
What all these screaming crybabies are saying is, “Don’t evolve without us.”
Evolution is the ultimate job bid, the ever present interview, and a merciless tyrant that brooks no fantasy delusions for very long.
The left has only one answer and that is genocide, so here we are the Monolith for lack of better words at the moment.
#6 by Joe Daddy on 01/28/2009 - 9:43 pm
The Religion will not allow anything but complete subservience. The Silly People in Dresses know that if any part of the anti-White Wall is taken down, their subjects will happily flock to the other side. The Religion would then quickly go the way of other silly religions and die a quick death.
We need to keep trying to tear down pieces of the Wall.
#7 by shari on 01/29/2009 - 9:52 am
I don’t know if I can say this very well and Bob will probably say I’m getting off the point,but. THE WHITE WEST IS CHRIST. He is the “HERO-GOD” whose resurrection in actual history,so touched our ancesters heart. They already believed in heros. This is not “THE RELIGION” in dresses that is political correctness. Yes, Africans and Asians can be christians, but they cannot STAY christians without WHITES. There is no such depth in their collective soul. We see this very obviously with mestizo mexicans. They have been baptized for generations, but they do not have any depth or become as WHITES.
#8 by Joe Daddy on 01/29/2009 - 6:05 pm
Shari, “The Religion” is short for The Religion of Political Correctness” and is run by silly peopl in dresses and college professors. I should have clarified.
I agree. Regardless of who wears the dresses or what the silly people in dresses say, non-whites will never be white but they can make us non-white through genocide.
#9 by Simmons on 01/31/2009 - 10:32 am
Politcal Correctness the religion being of the spirit world type, ruled over by Demons and Wizards.
#10 by thedude on 02/08/2009 - 8:30 am
“Anti-whites are always spouting about how massive immigration and assimilation demanded of ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is just Freedom”
Of course they always spout it, that’s all they know. Non-whites are taught that they can strip the “chains of inequality” which bind them by literally holding the “white” man down or diluting “his” world. This is a learned behavior taught in anti-white schools (the same places our kids are taught to hate themselves).
Reality is: They are bound by poor genetics to the “dullness of sub-average”. Anti-whites and Jews use this to their advantage and use it well for profit and power.
O’Reilly makes his living off of it too, but he is the “worse of the worse” because he actually blinds our less enlightened “white family” memebers.