They are anti-white and proud of it. To white anti-whites, hating white people is a form of virtuous self-sacrifice.
Remember that we are part of a tradition, both Puritan and monastic Catholicism, that has often gone overboard in the area of self-hatred. There is a fine line between acknowledging one’s guilt and going into all-out self-hatred, and our established religion, Political Correctness, wipes that line out on racial issues.
The first building stone of our established religion today is total self-hatred. If any European professor said the same things about blacks or Orientials or,above all, Jews, that European professors routinely say about whites, he would be in prison.
Anti-whites are PROUD to be anti-white.
#1 by Dave on 02/16/2009 - 12:30 pm
In this world you get exactly what you bargain for, you get exactly what you settle for.
An example is the Taliban’s insistence on Shania law (a non-negotiable demand that WILL BE REALIZED) throughout Pakistan and Afghanistan. Suddenly, the PC crowd is evidencing much greater respect for Shania law.
Who wudda thunk? (Shania law being 180 degrees opposite everything Political Correctness advocates.)
This is why the matter of “posture” in is so important. The Mantra isn’t an appeal for understanding. It is a non-negotiable view that WILL BE REALIZED.
There is nothing to argue because there is nothing that has to be argued. Our opponents only need to know that we are going to prevail and our commitment to prevailing is non-negotiable.
We need not even walk over the corpse of Political Correctness. We need not walk around it. It is already dust.
As regards suicidal tendencies and the affectations and conceits of self-hatred: That is all fine, UNTIL the moment of HAVING TO DIE in the HERE AND NOW.
You will find that affectation and conceit disappear with lighting speed.
#2 by heretic on 02/16/2009 - 2:45 pm
If any European professor said the same things about blacks or Orientials or,above all, Jews, that European professors routinely say about whites, he would be in prison.
That’s true in Canada, too, both in the letter and the spirit of the law. Anything that “may incite hatred” or “is meant to incite hatred” depending on the Judge)against an “identifiable group” is prosecutable, and that is irrespective of the truth of the statement, with a strange exception for “religious texts” (the Talmud).
Since the inevitable problem is that virtually everything a professor says about the White race is meant to incite hatred against it (duh…) “race does not exist”. Or, the White race must not exist. There is simply a random collection of individual humans who “happen” to have skin described as “white”. I promise you that is the loophole they would use, and that is why they teach that.
The reason I capitalize “White” is that it is a NAME of a people; “white” is an adjective.