Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

THE Races

Posted by Bob on July 16th, 2009 under Coaching Session, Mantra


Don’t let them get away with murder. That is what you do when you allow anyone to talk about “mixing THE races.”

It allows them get away with genocide. They tell you that all the races are taking an equal part in this, that it is just “fair play.” It INFURIATES me when people let this go by while they recited the latest line.

One of our spokesmen was doing an interview and the interviewer mentioned that nobody was demanding that Japan take in immigrants. Our spokesman, however, was busy talking about what an Aristocrat he was and let it slide.

Our Mantra:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Simmons on 07/17/2009 - 1:41 pm

    Even the lib kids are faster on the uptake than the semis. At their sites the smarter of them realize that with Obama and Sotamayor the word “racist” belongs to us now. But the semis still want to quote IQ studies and crime stats which of course are tertiary to the “basics.”

  2. #2 by 1Reader on 07/18/2009 - 1:51 pm

    Put on your seatbelts, because I am going to bore you to death with another long comment. Worry not though, if you so want to, pick out the pieces that interest you. I think that is more economical, bandwidth wise, than to post it in fractions to follow your short piece ideals.

    First of all I’m sick of hearing that we are all Humans. Humanity, Humans, are a genus, not a species (and defintely not a race). There have been several Human species over the course of history.

    Are you aware of that a genetic sequence (RRM2P4) that is common amongst Asians has its source from a two million year old Asian Homo Erectus? A Homo Erectus is not a racial clade of our species, it is (was) a different species of humans altogether. I am not saying that modern Asians are Homo Erectus derivatives, but you draw the conclusions.

    Also see http://www.pnas.org/content/103/48/18178.full for further views on the complex modern Human and subgroups of modern Humans development scenarios.

    It is funny, it is ok to go on in lengths about how much genome we may have (for example in the still hotly discussed neanderthal question, whos variabilities in its full truth which doesnt really change the practicality of our contemporary situation), and how much genome (like the above proves) some certainly do have without a doubt, from different humans species, let alone races (not only of Modern Humans, but from archaics like Neanderthals, who it is believed had more variety in the form of sub-races or sub-species amongst them than early Modern Humans at the time). But at the same time the same people go apologetic to the extreme to avoid talking about racial differences today. If you follow these kind of studies and developments in anthropology and molecular biology, as I tend to do, it appears like what it is; laughable. Studying reality but simulatenously being hell bent on trying to hide and avoid parts of it, motivating their research in every way possible so as to try to evade the obvious, and the further obvious inferences that naturally follow from it.

    As if the world will come to an end if we understand these things. Arent we supposed to cherish diversity? How is it any better today with all the decadent garbage going on.

    Lets not forget that one of the most usual reasons for the death of a species or race is >>extinction through assimilation<<. I have found first hand how people find it ok and important to talk about the genetic integrity of domestic species of Gastropods which are being threatened by hybridization with alien species, and delve into how horrible of a loss this is. But the same people don’t say a peep about their own people, their own lifeform, their own complex society. Its an absurd set of priorities. Building a society on lies and actively avoiding truth cannot in anyway be sound.

    But whether differences between clades of humans are such that they need to be called racial, or not (There is no doubt about it in my opinion), is not crucial in a social or as some would call it political perspective. Be it as it may, there are remarkable differences that need to be considered. As the important factor they are in our common, democratic interests. There is a difference between changing and being replaced, and our race, and indeed all its subclades, is risking to be replaced, with everything that our race entails.

    Open consideration of ethnical issues based on reality is needed, because [strong]it matters[/strong]… Practically everyone would oppose forcedly replacing any select Asian or African people in their own country, like someone mentioned as an example from a debate. Why should we not apply the same reasoning to ourselves. It is literally an issue of survival of our peoples in our most fundamental, racial meaning, important to every aspect of our lives.

    If I would for some reason not be sure about any of my reasoning, what I do is that I take a look at nature and reality and consider it again. I am in essence a realist, and a racial realist by all means included. I love nature, science, research and advocate a society; which makes it possibe for us to have an active and aware consideration of the very environment, not only in a biospherical sense but in its complete sense of the reality we live in, and how we pertain to it, in the aspects of our society. How can it be good to not base things from the very nature we live in, and consider things from how they pertain to that very reality, if that is where we are to be and our doings to occur.

    The implications of what is going on, go far beyond that of modern state constructs and nationalism (if that is even possible) tied to them (not that I am against the concept of state constructs as such, which I find are needed). I think American nationalists especially are first hand realizing this.

    There are many issues in society I am aware of, but I am also aware that it wont matter when we are gone as a people. So that needs to be the priority. I setup a prioity and that priority is to stop the racial genocide of Europeans. Frankly most of our groups have been responsible for less good things, but, this awareness will encourage responsibility and care. Racial reality is the number one needed subject which needs to be honestly dealt with today. I heard one quite active in the movement just recently, saying their is too much repetition, too much focus on race alone. Of course there is! Because this [strong]is[/strong] a [strong]racial[/strong] issue, in its most fundamental meaning. The nature of this importance of race and the right which need to be claimed in its name, doesnt change. You who run BUGS, you get it! (and quite possibly it has helped me to get some of these things as well) Thats why I like you so much 🙂 . Nationalism may be based on many different things, anything uniting a population, but the issue today is race. Social/Political technicalities can be left for latter, there might be more and less optimal ways of technically doing this, but they all relly just as much on basic awareness of these issues amongst the people using them. The rest is more like a polishing touch. Sociomechanical technicalities we cannot afford to quarrel about too much today, looking at the big picture of what is going on.

    And by the way, I hold on to what our ancestors already realized millenias ago, maybe far before that. That of democracy and freedom of expression. That of what we are as very beings.

    Awareness of insitutionalized, and private power misuse. Things need to be able to be motivated with that they are good for the society, for the community. A free market development is, private enterprise that can do what they want is not. Delegated rule can be, to enforce things amongst a people against their will is not. Democratic rule is needed, breaking other peoples rights is not.

    Competing banking can be good, private monopolized currencies are not. Why not then just have the banking sector public, due to its special nature.

    All of these things are based on the same reasoning as that which I base racial, ethnic awareness and consideration on. It is no different than the reasoning creating that of democracy or right to live. But there are priorities. What else can be the highest priority if not our existence and its future. Democracy needs to be based on reality and common interest, but one absolutely crucial issue is not discussed, in many places not even allowed legally to be discussed. The destruction, the genocide of Europeans are thus enforced, forcedly executed like from a despotic marxist tyranny or psychophatic private power.

    Most of us know, that if you are a European of any denomination anywhere, you are fully expected to actively commit destruction, genocide of yourself, to be acceptable. Refusing this, not wanting to be destroyed, caring about your people. Will have you labeled "hateful". Hateful for not wanting to die. A threatre of the absurd.

    Yes, it is genocide, the people supporting this are actively and fully working to wipe out the very traits, visually apparent and those less apparent, defining different European peoples, of the face of the planet. Something ancient, something unique, something that they want to throw away in the blink of an eye. Luckily, more and more Whites are reacting to this, and discussion is more open. And rest assured Whites will react to it, it is important that these reactions are of a constructive nature.

    Maybe you will find a sentence or two that are of any interest in here. Or maybe something to criticize, its ok, I like to challenge my own views. It is the way I see things should be, rather than some of our antagonists, who'd rather use stones and bricks.

    Yes, I am aware that this is not needed to get our points through, not at all. I would never go on about this when explaining the issues of racial realism to someone in general. Most are probably not interested in it and again it is not needed to get it. But maybe some of it will be interesting for more intricate racial perspectives.

  3. #3 by 1Reader on 07/18/2009 - 1:52 pm

    Put on your seatbelts, because I am going to bore you to death with another long comment. Worry not though, if you so want to, pick out the pieces that interest you. I think that is more economical, bandwidth wise, than to post it in fractions to follow your short piece ideals.

    First of all I’m sick of hearing that we are all Humans. Humanity, Humans, are a genus, not a species (and defintely not a race). There have been several Human species over the course of history.

    Are you aware of that a genetic sequence (RRM2P4) that is common amongst Asians has its source from a two million year old Asian Homo Erectus? A Homo Erectus is not a racial clade of our species, it is (was) a different species of humans altogether. I am not saying that modern Asians are Homo Erectus derivatives, but you draw the conclusions.

    Also see http://www.pnas.org/content/103/48/18178.full

    It is funny, it is ok to go on in lengths about how much genome we may have (for example in the still hotly discussed neanderthal question, whos variabilities in its full truth which doesnt really change the practicality of our contemporary situation), and how much genome (like the above proves) some certainly do have without a doubt, from different humans species, let alone races (not only of Modern Humans, but from archaics like Neanderthals, who it is believed had more variety in the form of sub-races or sub-species amongst them than early Modern Humans at the time). But at the same time the same people go apologetic to the extreme to avoid talking about racial differences today. If you follow these kind of studies and developments in anthropology and molecular biology, as I tend to do, it appears like what it is; laughable. Studying reality but simulatenously being hell bent on trying to hide and avoid parts of it, motivating their research in every way possible so as to try to evade the obvious, and the further obvious inferences that naturally follow from it.

    As if the world will come to an end if we understand these things. Arent we supposed to cherish diversity? How is it any better today with all the decadent garbage going on.

    Lets not forget that one of the most usual reasons for the death of a species or race is >>extinction through assimilation<<. I have found first hand how people find it ok and important to talk about the genetic integrity of domestic species of Gastropods which are being threatened by hybridization with alien species, and delve into how horrible of a loss this is. But the same people don’t say a peep about their own people, their own lifeform, their own complex society. Its an absurd set of priorities. Building a society on lies and actively avoiding truth cannot in anyway be sound.

    But whether differences between clades of humans are such that they need to be called racial, or not (There is no doubt about it in my opinion), is not crucial in a social or as some would call it political perspective. Be it as it may, there are remarkable differences that need to be considered. As the important factor they are in our common, democratic interests. There is a difference between changing and being replaced, and our race, and indeed all its subclades, is risking to be replaced, with everything that our race entails.

    Open consideration of ethnical issues based on reality is needed, because [strong]it matters[/strong]… Practically everyone would oppose forcedly replacing any select Asian or African people in their own country, like someone mentioned as an example from a debate. Why should we not apply the same reasoning to ourselves. It is literally an issue of survival of our peoples in our most fundamental, racial meaning, important to every aspect of our lives.

    If I would for some reason not be sure about any of my reasoning, what I do is that I take a look at nature and reality and consider it again. I am in essence a realist, and a racial realist by all means included. I love nature, science, research and advocate a society; which makes it possibe for us to have an active and aware consideration of the very environment, not only in a biospherical sense but in its complete sense of the reality we live in, and how we pertain to it, in the aspects of our society. How can it be good to not base things from the very nature we live in, and consider things from how they pertain to that very reality, if that is where we are to be and our doings to occur.

    The implications of what is going on, go far beyond that of modern state constructs and nationalism (if that is even possible) tied to them (not that I am against the concept of state constructs as such, which I find are needed). I think American nationalists especially are first hand realizing this.

    There are many issues in society I am aware of, but I am also aware that it wont matter when we are gone as a people. So that needs to be the priority. I setup a prioity and that priority is to stop the racial genocide of Europeans. Frankly most of our groups have been responsible for less good things, but, this awareness will encourage responsibility and care. Racial reality is the number one needed subject which needs to be honestly dealt with today. I heard one quite active in the movement just recently, saying their is too much repetition, too much focus on race alone. Of course there is! Because this [strong]is[/strong] a [strong]racial[/strong] issue, in its most fundamental meaning. The nature of this importance of race and the right which need to be claimed in its name, doesnt change. You who run BUGS, you get it! (and quite possibly it has helped me to get some of these things as well) Thats why I like you so much 🙂 . Nationalism may be based on many different things, anything uniting a population, but the issue today is race. Social/Political technicalities can be left for latter, there might be more and less optimal ways of technically doing this, but they all relly just as much on basic awareness of these issues amongst the people using them. The rest is more like a polishing touch. Sociomechanical technicalities we cannot afford to quarrel about too much today, looking at the big picture of what is going on.

    And by the way, I hold on to what our ancestors already realized millenias ago, maybe far before that. That of democracy and freedom of expression. That of what we are as very beings.

    Awareness of insitutionalized, and private power misuse. Things need to be able to be motivated with that they are good for the society, for the community. A free market development is, private enterprise that can do what they want is not. Delegated rule can be, to enforce things amongst a people against their will is not. Democratic rule is needed, breaking other peoples rights is not.

    Competing banking can be good, private monopolized currencies are not. Why not then just have the banking sector public, due to its special nature.

    All of these things are based on the same reasoning as that which I base racial, ethnic awareness and consideration on. It is no different than the reasoning creating that of democracy or right to live. But there are priorities. What else can be the highest priority if not our existence and its future. Democracy needs to be based on reality and common interest, but one absolutely crucial issue is not discussed, in many places not even allowed legally to be discussed. The destruction, the genocide of Europeans are thus enforced, forcedly executed like from a despotic marxist tyranny or psychophatic private power.

    Most of us know, that if you are a European of any denomination anywhere, you are fully expected to actively commit destruction, genocide of yourself, to be acceptable. Refusing this, not wanting to be destroyed, caring about your people. Will have you labeled "hateful". Hateful for not wanting to die. A threatre of the absurd.

    Yes, it is genocide, the people supporting this are actively and fully working to wipe out the very traits, visually apparent and those less apparent, defining different European peoples, of the face of the planet. Something ancient, something unique, something that they want to throw away in the blink of an eye. Luckily, more and more Whites are reacting to this, and discussion is more open. And rest assured Whites will react to it, it is important that these reactions are of a constructive nature.

    Maybe you will find a sentence or two that are of any interest in here. Or maybe something to criticize, its ok, I like to challenge my own views. It is the way I see things should be, rather than some of our antagonists, who'd rather use stones and bricks.

    Yes, I am aware that this is not needed to get our points through, not at all. I would never go on about this when explaining the issues of racial realism to someone in general. Most are probably not interested in it and again it is not needed to get it. But maybe some of it will be interesting for more intricate racial perspectives.

You must be logged in to post a comment.