If you accept that the Inquisition never did physical damage to Jews, you can accept that the priesthood of the temple did nothing to Jesus. But the converse is true. If you overlook the responsibility of the Inquisition that crucified Jesus you must hold the Inquisition guiltless.
One could say that both the Inquisition and the Crucifixion were terrible mistakes in the millennia-long history of Jews and of the Church of Rome. They cannot be blamed on MODERN Catholics or Jews.
But there is a huge difference here. The Catholic Church has admitted it did wrong. The Pope has gone to Israel and groveled at the Jews’ feet for the Inquisition. He has rolled and puked and peed in his robes over the Evil the Church did to Jews.
In other words, the Church admits it was wrong and separates modern Catholics from the errors of their predecessors. The only problem is that, like other white gentiles, the Church keeps on groveling to a sickening extent.
Jewish reaction to Mel Gibson’s perfectly accurate portrayal of the Crucifixion was the exact opposite. The Jews said that if the Temple Priesthood back then did an evil thing, then that evil is still part of Judaism. This is odd, but that IS the logic..
If you insist that admitting a 2000 year old error by Jews is anti-Semitic, you are agreeing with the anti-Semites.
By the same token, Jews who insist that any attempt to save the white race is Nazi are agreeing with Hitler. They are saying that Jews and Aryans cannot survive in the same world.
#1 by shari on 08/07/2009 - 12:17 pm
Not living in the same world is where I think it’s going. Will be best for all. Here’s some interesting stuff on the inquisition.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56045
#2 by Dave on 08/08/2009 - 12:17 am
In the real world, the opinions of the Jewish Establishment don’t count. They take great care to get their say, proving to themselves that the mirages they so ardently believe in are real.
And round and round they go.
Mistaking the resentments that comprise their identity for knowledge of what it means to be free.
#3 by backbaygrouch5 on 08/09/2009 - 12:39 pm
About forty years back I remember watching a Jewsih comic named George Jessel [he billed himself as the Toastmaster General and made a lot doing event appearences] on the late night show. He was was annoyed at another jewish guest who was ranting about the evil Nazis and how they thought they were superior and all that. He shut the pest up by saying that the Aryan master race theory was simply an update of the God’s Chosen People fantasy. He silenced the audience too by adding “That was one nasty chicken that came home to roost.” His network appearences fell off after that incident. They never seem to appreciate that ideas have logical progressions, though Jessel did. Actually he was a cut above the other Borscht Belt denizons.
#4 by Simmons on 08/09/2009 - 1:30 pm
A jewish anti-white wants to way out do Hitler, and how ironic that is. But as I have said the jews/nazis were not enemies they were competitors. When someone calls Bob anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionmorejews they are not debating abstract principles they are personalizing the argument, and I think that is what we need to do once the Mantra has been played.
#5 by Tim on 08/09/2009 - 2:18 pm
Simmons,
Good point. Hebrew leadership is consistently projecting their own thoughts on others. They scream Hate etc but they are always the biggest culprits of WHAT they accuse others of doing.
The challenge for them is the current realty. The whole world can see them, watch them on Youtube, and read all about them online.
Bob,
Way to point out the obvious. This is one of your best posts. In encompasses virtually all of your thinking attributes in a short, concise, and very readable entry. Very crafty.
I seem to recall an interview with a famous white racialist. I cannot remember who it was?? But he stated that Jews were just upset that THEY did not think up National Socialism first.
Oh and lets not forget one fact. Jewish leaders are calling anybody that disagrees with them a Nazi. They are also accusing anyone that wants self rule a Nazi (like Hugo Chavez, Arabs etc).
#6 by Simmons on 08/09/2009 - 4:22 pm
Kubrick made movies showing how gullible the gentiles were to wordism, but one of them ended a bit different. Clockwork Orange was about the usual do-harmer nonsense of perfecting the unperfectable and it was done by the work of a jewish doctor and his method of brain damage. Well this method slightly misfired and the high minister of do gooding a WASP of great and snaky intentions takes advantage of this, drops the wordism and inserts humanity in place of wordism when at the end he takes the somewhat victimized central character under his wings and places the blame on the evil doctor jew.
Moral being, even the goyimkopf will learn to turn his “common sense of oppression” into the usefulness of the personalized politics.