Sometimes I get so wrapped up in explaining a concept that I forget WHY I am discussing it.
If you look up “Taking Credit and Power Strategy” in our really excellent search engine, you will see the concept. The REASON I wrote it was so that you would understand why it is necessary NOT to give me credit for my concepts.
The reason this blog works is, as I explain there, precisely because my concepts are broad enough so that main line commentators can use them without mentioning ME. As I explained in the case of Rusher giving ME credit, it was fatal.
This is easy for professional commentators. Their job is taking credit and they are not extremely bright. But for you it is different. You are driven to give credit where credit is due.
This could be very costly to what we are trying to do.
I wrote Taking Credit because a commenter wrote a paper on Wordism for his professor. He was flattered that Simmons said I had written it FOR him. I was flattered too, because I didn’t.
He proved that what I say makes sense and he can USE my thinking. That is my whole purpose in being.
If he uses the concept as his own, that’s even better. If YOU use the concept as your own, that is great, too.
One thing standing in the way of the Mantra is that it is anchored to ME.
You can’t be a Leader if you don’t have ego with huge roots that go right into your unconscientious mind. So David Duke and Jared Taylor and our talk show hosts cannot use any statement too close to the Mantra because their followers know it is not THEIR Mantra.
You see how this works?
This gives YOU great freedom. It also requires that YOU take credit for extending my concepts as if you originated them. This is not easy for your kind of conscience. But it is CRITICAL for our success in getting our concepts out.
#1 by Dave on 09/01/2009 - 10:59 am
Something seemingly innocuous can have tremendous power.
BW wrote a piece criticizing Libertarian Wordism by saying, “What they forget is to add “mine” to “me” in the phrase “me and mine”. This is a lot bigger than Libertarian Wordism.
It is a hook to literally grab people by the nape of the next and hoist their nostrils above the waters to a NEW WAY OF SEEING.
We have been flogged with the phrase, “We must devote ourselves to something beyond our own narrow interests”, endlessly for the past 90 years. It is the very thing that hooks Joe and Sally Sixpack into the maw of political servitude.
The MSM never lets up. They flog the phrase from every angle imaginable. It is spun into the whole fabric of their scheme in conditioning the public to political servitude, an endless drumbeat, 24 x 7, they never relent.
It is Orwellian in extent and scope and all the worse for being very real. The smellier and more corrupt the politician, the more the phrase gets repeated.
The phrase “me and mine” is a revolutionary countermeasure.
It preps for the Mantra. It is the very thing the public has forgotten.
#2 by Tim on 09/01/2009 - 3:05 pm
“One thing standing in the way of the Mantra is that it is anchored to ME.”
I think you are in the process of being disconnected from the Mantra. Which is what we all want so it can go to a broader audience.
Over the last month, every time I have a conversation with anyone in this struggle. They all say something similar. They did not understand why a consistent message was important nor did they really get what you were trying to tell them with the Mantra on stormfront etc.
Then they followed the white rabbit and heard it form a different angle. THEN they got it. It appears you have to have the message coming from different angles.
So don’t worry Bob. The seminary students are now out preaching the gospel….on their own for better or worse. The white world really loves it’s heretics. We just needed more heretics out preaching. There are enough young priests out there for them to start forgetting about you.
In the short term, there may be a lot of interest in the “heretic” that started the seminary. But that will be a short term thing you have to put up with. We are in a growing struggle. Fresh White Rabbits are coming online everyday. The new priests like the commenters will have them dazzled enough to forget about you.
The challenge was getting the first batch of seminary students.
#3 by Dave on 09/03/2009 - 12:57 am
White people created the Civil Rights Movement.
White people forced integration.
White people established the Religion of Political Correctness.
White people refuse to enforce their borders.
White people hypnotized the entire world into BELIEF in racial equality.
Nonwhites had nothing to do with it. Any of it.
Nonwhites are today and have always been subordinate to the white mind and its whims.
The whole cloth of multiculturalism is white religion.
The whole cloth of integration is white religion.
What BUGS is NOT is religion, in any way shape or form.
It is the opposite or religion.
It is the awaking from religion.
White men’s religion.
Into reality.
Into what is actually true.
#4 by Simmons on 09/03/2009 - 11:02 am
BUGS is about responsibility, French novelist Saint-Exupery, ” To be a man, is, precisely, to be responsible.” The religion of PC is intended for the emotive of the childish and intemperate feminine mind that “wishes for”, and refuses responsibility.
Out there in the failing world are people trapped in what amounts to a mad woman’s day care center, desperate for a man to come along and set order back as it should be. Have we not heard that refrain?, “Wait till your father gets home.”