Institutions have their own biology. They have a separate evolutionary process which may or may not gel with that of the people who make up the institution. People who evolve in the same areas tend to look alike. The same is true of institutions.

When people point out how similar the Great Religions are, they think they are saying that each one has the same truth. Actually the Great Religions have similarities in the same way that animals developing in similar environments have the same features.

All institutions are fundamentally anti-racist. National Socialism was fanatically anti-Jew, anti-democratic pro-militarist, nationalistic, anti-pornography, socialistic, anti-Communist and a long list of other things.

In Italy fascism was anti-racist before the rise of Hitler. As in all Latin countries, what was important was that you spoke Italian and identified yourself as Italian, regardless of the color of your skin.

One of the pleas a Nazi would use if he was up on charges was to select “race treason” in his plea bargaining, because it was a relatively minor charge.

Every institution tends to become more and like those it is competes with. National Socialism had to balance its endless list of things it was against.

Even the caste system, which is called the “color” system in Sanskrit, lost all relevance to its real purpose when it faced Buddhism and other anti-racist institutions. The Reformed Church of South Africa, which only existed because of Boer identity, sold out the white race.

Putting your identity into an institution is a great deal like Sauron putting so much of his being into the One Ring. The institution inevitably follows its own evolution and you lose your children to it.

The fought a millennium-long reconquista in the name of their royalty and their Church. Once they had established their Church, though, it became as anti-white as any institution. The bigotry of Hispanics was turned against those who were Catholic, not those who were not white.

The reconquista was a fight of Europeans to reconquer Europe. Now “Hispanic” means non-whites fighting to take what whites have. This was Sauron’s Error. They put their identity into an institution separate from their own biological identity.

In Asia, a dialogue can go like this:

“How is your lovely home?”

“That wreck is fine.”

“And how is the flower of your household?”

“That pig is well.”

So Political Correctness is not the only faith to look upon insults to oneself, one’s country and one’s family as the highest sign of civilized behavior.

Jesus reduced the Ten Commandments to two, something today’s churches do not accept. One of these commandments was “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” But the Trappists were proud that it would have been illegal, even in Medieval times, to treat anyone else the way they treated themselves.

Trappists have stopped that nonsense. Yes, even the most extreme portions of the Catholic Church can learn. A generation ago no one would have believed that the Trappists could outgrow their self-torture.

Dave has pointed out brilliantly how this sort of “sacrifice” is SICK. Political Correctness will have to catch up with the Trappists. Whipping yourself violates the Golden Rule. Hating and insulting your own is not immoral.

Thirty years ago, it was generally agreed that man would colonize space. Onward and forward was claimed by all political sides. But that was also when whites were supposed to be multiplying to the Soylent Green level.

Today all talk is about conservation. A Green Movement will not only keep the world as it is, but will cut back. Each human born is a liability, especially white ones. In short, by a strange coincidence the inevitable future brown world is also a stagnant world.

You would be jailed in Europe for putting these concepts together but anyone with the slightest knowledge of history and geography cannot but connect them in his subconscious mind. There is the Viking image of the Nordic traveler and conqueror and the ideal of the little brown people who are stagnant permanently stagnant and permanently oppressed.

A future of little brown people who are permanently stagnant and oppressed is conveyed by the words Hispanic and is seen in the Great Civilizations of the past who are now brown and fixed, apparently forever. They used to be considered a shame. Now they are considered Ideal, as “living WITH nature, rather than opposing it.

Which, by a strange coincidence, are the same words used by the same conservationist to describe the virtues of OTHER animals.

Sometimes I get so wrapped up in explaining a concept that I forget WHY I am discussing it.

If you look up “Taking Credit and Power Strategy” in our really excellent search engine, you will see the concept. The REASON I wrote it was so that you would understand why it is necessary NOT to give me credit for my concepts.

The reason this blog works is, as I explain there, precisely because my concepts are broad enough so that main line commentators can use them without mentioning ME. As I explained in the case of Rusher giving ME credit, it was fatal.

This is easy for professional commentators. Their job is taking credit and they are not extremely bright. But for you it is different. You are driven to give credit where credit is due.

This could be very costly to what we are trying to do.

I wrote Taking Credit because a commenter wrote a paper on Wordism for his professor. He was flattered that Simmons said I had written it FOR him. I was flattered too, because I didn’t.

He proved that what I say makes sense and he can USE my thinking. That is my whole purpose in being.

If he uses the concept as his own, that’s even better. If YOU use the concept as your own, that is great, too.

One thing standing in the way of the Mantra is that it is anchored to ME.

You can’t be a Leader if you don’t have ego with huge roots that go right into your unconscientious mind. So David Duke and Jared Taylor and our talk show hosts cannot use any statement too close to the Mantra because their followers know it is not THEIR Mantra.

You see how this works?

This gives YOU great freedom. It also requires that YOU take credit for extending my concepts as if you originated them. This is not easy for your kind of conscience. But it is CRITICAL for our success in getting our concepts out.