I am always a bit taken aback when people ask me about Obama. I answer “He’s black.”
I am even more perplexed when people can’t understand what I just said. There is absolutely nothing you can say that is specific to Obama. He is the mouthpiece of the old New England crowd that is in power now. He is the embodiment of the coat and tie well-spoken “Negro” of 1960s movies.
Take his reaction to the latest terrorist airplane incident. His response was that no one would be allowed to go to the toilet on any airplane within an hour of landing. That is like the response to mass shootings for decades, which was to demand gun control. Every mouthpiece said that.
And now the theme is that Obama has shown his Leadership by banning anyone from “pointing fingers.” On September 11 I stated flatly that not only would no one get fired for that screw-up, I predicted no one would get CRITICIZED. It was a far-out prediction at that point, but everybody has forgotten that.
In fact, if you read my articles on 9/11 and 9/12, you will see that I predicted that not only would no one be fired, I said that everyone in charge on 9/11 would get PROMOTED.
They have.
The doctrine of the Experts when they let a disaster happen is “No finger pointing,” No “blame game.”
For any group of experts, letting a disaster happen is the key to promotion. Sociologists had a tiny field going when they first said criminals were the only REAL victims. Since they dominated the campuses at our willing expense, the crime rate has gone out of sight.
How many sociologists have been fired?
None.
Criminology is a branch of sociology, so hundreds of thousands of sociology majors have been hired to deal with the crime crisis. No sociologist has ever been fired or even criticized for what he said before. Conservatives go out of their way to WORSHIP Intellectuals.
9/11 was the best thing that ever happened to the industry that caused it.
A disaster is the best thing experts can produce if there is No Finger Pointing. So Obama recites their mantra, like any other mouthpiece, and his only solution is, as always, to make rules that restrict citizens even more.
As I have so often pointed out, the only people who prevented that last airline bombing were the ordinary citizens who have to wear their pants around their hips and be barefoot.
None of this is new. Train wrecks killed larger percentage of Americans in 1868 than car crashes do now, and there is no comparison between the percentage who die today and the proportion that took trains back then. In Innocents Abroad, Mark Twain explained why the French death rate per mile on railroads was almost zero while the French trains were as safe as airline travel today.
In France, if trains crashed, a person was ALWAYS responsible. It was all finger-pointing. In America, Twain pointed out, the railway owners always settled for calling it a pure accident, no finger pointing.
In France rail employees were TERRIFIED of crashes. In America they had nothing to worry about. So there were a lot of crashes in America and almost none in France.
During World War II, too many parachutes were improperly packed, which meant death to the troops using them. Then a rule was passed that those who packed the chutes had to JUMP with a randomly selected chute they had packed on a regular basis.
The percentage of improperly packed chutes fell like a rock.
Or like the guy who packed it badly.
So don’t give me the bullshit about how security personnel really are about it so there is no need for finger pointing. Those parachute packers were pumped up with loyalty to the War Effort and were as worried about the welfare of the people who depended on their chutes as security people are, especially the Ivy League crowd that runs Intelligence and the Obama Administration.
But finger pointing, making them jump with their own chutes, got RESULTS that a group that avoids finger pointing cannot get.
Finger pointing works. And Obama’s only message is that he is black.
#1 by Frank on 01/06/2010 - 6:10 pm
Gustavo’s 2nd hit piece just surfaced here: http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/the-hilarious-haters/american-third-position-party/
#2 by backbaygrouch4 on 01/06/2010 - 6:58 pm
America has a unique legal doctrine, sometimes called purity of the temple. If the police or the prosecutor violate laws in gathering evidence, the criminal walks. Everywhere else the evidence is allowed and the officials are punished for their acts. In America the public is punished by allowing criminals to walk while the officials seldom face any censure.
The reasoning given is that the inability of the officials to prosecute will discourage wrongful actions. This reasoning escapes the rest of the world where punishment is seen as a greater prod towards adherence to correct methods than immunity for public payroll malefactors. They see no reason to let a criminal walk whenever evidence, rightfully or wrongfully gathered, proves guilt.
In brief in the United States the court system is operated for the benefit of those who run it rather than the public in a way no other nation tolerates, at least in theory. This is illustrative of Bob’s argument. It is so ingrained that most Americans do not even notice it or ever question the manifest stupidity of the situation.
#3 by warweaver on 01/06/2010 - 11:37 pm
I’ve been repeating this idea set forth here: that the ‘experts’ who didn’t see the disaster coming are, for some reason, the folks those elected showboats turn to when the fan needs the crap cleaned off of it. I guess I picked it up from reading bob’s site for the last few years.
The other thing I’ve noticed about these embedded greaseballs inside the beltway is that they have begun referring to themselves as “leaders.” I thought the whole point of America is that we dont have ‘leaders’ and that we elect persons merely to represent our views to the republic.
Those idiots up there, who were nearly to a man (undoubtedly) among the last people picked at recess, somehow have it in their minds that they are somehow natural leaders, that their views, outside of the bubble they slink around in, are worth more than everyone else’s.
I might have stolen this last idea (that the trend of those folks up there referring to themselves as ‘leaders’ is somehow new) from this site as well. At this point I’ve probably lifted so many ideas from this site that I dont even know which ones are mine anymore.
No matter. I know that I keep coming back here after several years, long since I’ve lost interest in Stormfront and Amren.
Keep up the good stuff, Bob, Dave, and Simmons.
#4 by Simmons on 01/07/2010 - 10:08 am
Speaking of colleges the flagship of the Illinois universities is not getting its taxpayer boodle to the tune of many millions, and the poor dears are looking at a 5% paycut for starters. I for one do not think they are worshipped that much, save for a few public “intellectuals” kept to spew the conventional wisdom.
Anyway, moving on, if any little political movement wants to become a bigger political movement they should throw the fox of responsibility into the henhouse of the libs/respectables. Divide and conquer being the game.
The general tack of the strategy being to hold the respectables responsible for the actions of the Big Momma Libs and their unruly spawn the head case Radical Kids. That is a start to eventually getting around to corralling the Left with the Left’s help.
Basics being you never leave your enemies behind you unless they are fully neutralized and helpless, and the respectables are nothing but possible enemies.
#5 by Dave on 01/07/2010 - 10:16 am
Their errors are paid for with guidance, but it is not for them for they are deaf, dumb, and blind.
And they walk in a darkness that will never run into day.
There is a big difference between the world of the blind and the world or the sighted.
And that is another reason these racketeers, who hide behind a Negro showman, can never defeat us.
#6 by Simmons on 01/07/2010 - 11:01 am
Well Frank, that is all good and well. I read the responses some good some quibbled the details with a pet monkey.
How about you query the publishers for a rebuttal to this anti-white propaganda they are responsible for putting on the web (there is that word again).
Remember writing basics 101, the intro must actually introduce what you mean to prove. That means within a few sentences the phrase or “anti-racism is nothing but anti-white”, or something real close to that must appear.
#7 by warweaver on 01/07/2010 - 4:54 pm
Simmons:
I attended graduate school not long ago and in the wake of the budget crunches in SC, the school was facing a 2 million dollar shortfall.
The administration’s first reaction was to announce, as though the student body had some overriding concern about the matter, that NO ONE WOULD BE LET GO.
Well, if that wasn’t about more than I could handle. I suggested, in a forum attended by half of the graduate school’s student body, and many of its professors and administration, that the Career Services Office should be cut, if not canned altogether, and that the library staff should be cut back dramatically, since neither of those services offered anything useful to anyone in the student body.
Gasps were audible and nobody knew quite what to make of the common sense proposals.
Instead, it was made known later, the student body was to be expanded and tuition raised. In this particular graduate program, US News & World Report rankings determines, absolutely, that schools reputation in the country. Well, expanding the size of the freshmen classes would, without any question, necessitate admitting marginal, even by the school’s already unflattering standards, and making our tuition even more unaffordable than it already was.
In short, the institution mortgaged itself merely to keep from having to fire a half dozen utterly useless employees who, and I say this with absolute first hand knowledge, conferred no service either to the institution itself or to the student body.
In short, they circles the wagons and cannibalized the school’s ranking and the student body’s financial resources.
In a nutshell, that is government.
I hope to see all of you soon on the freakin’ barricades cause I’m so sick of this crap I really cant stand it for much longer.
#8 by Alan B on 01/09/2010 - 8:55 pm
The system is the hand that guides the sponge of Ignorant masses over the mess that is money.
Obama is a black man. Obama is educated and articulate. Obama was a college professor. Obama was a community organizer. Obama is a US Senator. Obama is for the little guy and against the system. Obama seeks only justice and change. Obama is elected president. Did I mention Obama is a black man?
Millions of voters have buyers remorse,they were betrayed. Obama is a Leftwing Liberal fraud. Obama broke all his promises. Obama is a part of the system. The establishment says don’t be racist, give Obama a chance. Don’t pass judgement upon him to soon, have hope. Did I mention Obama is black.