People who use the word “liar” freely are never truthful people. So I see it as a big word when I use it. But I have to now.
They fired Dr. Watson, co-Nobel Laureate, for saying that Africa’s problems are a result of low IQ’s.
The Bell Curve was a best-seller when it made that clear beyond dispute. So what have they done? They simply outlawed saying that.
In the 1950s, there was no such thing as schizophrenia. You could only call it The Schizophrenic Response. That was to make it clear that all professionals agreed it was a RESPONSE having nothing to do with human chemistry or, God knows, GENETICS.
All experts agreed on that, hence the term.
Once again, a tiny group began to look at the TESTS. The proof of the pudding was that one treated The Schizophrenic Response only by TALKING a person out of the trauma that caused that Response. But, as with racial IQ, the tests came out wrong. The American Psychiatric Association condemned such testing.
But tests on drugs by the FDA showed that they DID work. A drug company official can go to prison for selling something that comes out wrong in tests. If the psychiatrists then had sold their far more expensive Talk Cure treatments as a drug, they would have gone to prison for selling them.
Now the psychiatrists have made sure that only psychiatrists can prescribe many of those drugs. So they admitted they were wrong. But they never SAY they were wrong. The Schizophrenic Response has gone down the Memory Hole, like racial IQ analysis.
Mommy Professor has stopped trying to deal with testing that leads to heresy and has gone to outright suppression. They do not deal with Dr. Watson the way they did with Dr. Jensen.
Why does information get produced? There is no other way you can understand this new phenomenon. Suddenly the tests have begun to come out RIGHT.
Recently a whole group of tests has come out showing that the Talk Cure works and drugs do not, the way it should have come out in the first place. This is not even logical, since the problem is now universally admitted to be chemical and a diagenetic rather than a response.
The Genome Project always comes out RIGHT. Every testing that is financed is now a Just So Story.
In the past, making up one’s test results before you started risked exposure, even in the vacuum-sealed halls of academe. They’ve learned from that. The exposure of the open frauds by Global Warning advocates is just the surface, the one time they got caught. If they openly cheat on that kind of test, what kind of License to Kill do they have on RACE?
So far nobody but me has pointed out how obvious this is: “to be a forensic pathologist, you have to do two things,
1) deduce the race of a victim from the tiniest rotting remains, and
2) Join all the other Recognized Experts in denying that race exists.”
The era of the Jensens and Rushtons is OVER. The Bell Curve would not be published today. No book or treatise will be published if it contradicts orthodoxy, and certainly no study will be FINANCED if it does not guarantee results ahead of time.
The bottom line is that we will no longer be ALLOWED long explanations. We have watched the Mantra being routinely blacked out everywhere. But we sneak it in. You can’t sneak a TOME in.
We must use short, devastating stuff, like the Mantra or my description of what a forensic pathologist must do. The era of Jensen is passed. The era of BUGS has begun.
#1 by Dave on 02/27/2010 - 10:06 am
Look past the agenda of the anti whites whites and Political Correctness to their deformity.
Do not succumb to mirroring their deformity. This is precisely what the Established (and enabling) Opposition (Respectable Conservatives) have done. They have succumbed to the deformity of the very people they claim to oppose.
Robert Whitaker’s advice is correct: “Check yourself out first”.
Everything the cultists do creates problems. The cultists leave a wake of problems in everything they do. They are no one’s friend. The cultists are problem creators as all deformed people are. They have cut themselves off from the whole of life and its manifold truths. Do you really think they have done nonwhites any good?
Horus is correct in declaring: “We are REACTING to a PROBLEM.” I will add: “That can destroy you if you are not careful”.
Look beyond the enemy’s agenda to his deformity. If he were not deformed, he would not put so much effort into corrupting and into suppressing others. See past the enemy to Screwtape, and HIS agenda.
Political Correctness forces us into militancy. We have to REACT. But the essential way to defeat them is to refuse to succumb to their deformity. It will be the WHOLE of our reaction that will defeat them. Not just militancy born of the crucible THEY created. We must not cut ourselves off from the whole of life.
This is nothing the 18th century Americans who made a revolution didn’t know. And because they knew it, they succeeded.
We shall do the same thing.
#2 by Simmons on 02/27/2010 - 11:17 am
Honestly ask yourself, who believes the cultists anymore? Each lib/kid cult is very small and they conform to a rigid sense of PC as to keep their coalition together, but there ain’t much there.
The contradictions are so great that some of the greatest comedy is watching a left wing blog like Kos or Hufpo navigate its own stormy seas. Without the phony opposition they would never ever survive.
They can suppress the topic of race if we were 100% white but there are whole demographics dedicated to race on the left and they are not going away, they are our allies. Thank god for Obama.
#3 by shari on 02/27/2010 - 11:46 am
When lies are in danger of being exposed,what comes out, is the Schizophrenic RESPONSE. Expect to see more and more of it.
#4 by Simmons on 02/27/2010 - 12:11 pm
Bob is outthinking this problem, his being a PHD answer, and therefore he gives the other side way too much credit.
On the other hand my take on mass psychology is to start with the individual and scale up the response and cultural attitudes in size demographically.
In the white western world PC is the scaled up maternal white woman’s desire for group amity through the glossing over of “problems” and conflicts.
It is why I refer to America as a giant day care facility run by increasingly distraught women.
Learn to deal with a woman of soft tyranical bent and you will learn the methodology of defeating our enemies.
Place the weight of “Responsibility” upon their heads and they crumble, the authors of the Bible were right women are not the responsible party men are.
The Mantra places this “responsibility” upon others’ shoulders, it crushes them, we have this evidence.
#5 by Epiphany on 02/27/2010 - 5:10 pm
The trick is not to become too emotional. We shall keep our cool, no matter what nonsense the Left chooses to babble at us.
By the way, I really doubt that the Feminists and the Multiculturalists can really get along with each other that well. For, if anything, the non Western Cultures that these Multiculturalists tend to champion are actually even more sexist, male chauvinist, and patriarchical than our own!
#6 by backbaygrouch4 on 02/27/2010 - 6:43 pm
Today Chile was battered by one of the most violent earthquakes recorded. The outside world will help. But Chileans will organize and recover swiftly with or without foreign assistance. The most immediate needs will be met before aid arrives. A few short weeks ago a lesser quake hit Haiti. The response of the local population was a greater disaster than the quake. They waited for the world to come.
Similarly, few years back Hurricane Katrina ravaged New Orleans and massive flooding covered huge swathes of the upper Mississippi valley. The damage to the former was acerbated by the hapless locals while the intelligent, industrious stoicism of the latter minimized the catastrophe.
The variable in each case is obvious, so clear that the American news industry will not mention it.
Censorship in the United States is far more controlling of ideas than it ever was in the Soviet Empire. There the citizens were on to the government’s game. Here it is privatized so most do not see it or think it is in place. The steel fist of duplicity is hidden in a velvet glove of illusory liberty. The gatekeepers are not federal employees and are more effective for it. You will not hear that Haiti is Black and Chile is White. It is too obvious even to be whispered. The Mantra shouts it.
#7 by Epiphany on 02/27/2010 - 9:42 pm
The media is obviously controlled.
#8 by Dave on 02/27/2010 - 11:18 pm
Epiphany,
If the media is obviously controlled I invite you to Google “Juan Enriquez shares mindboggling science” or use the coordinates http://www.ted.com/talks/juan_enriquez_shares_mindboggling_new_science.html to watch the video.
The video you will watch mostly on recent and near future advances in practical applications of genetic engineering repeats Nazi “evolution” ontology with remarkable fidelity.
Keep in mind that TED is a mainstream Ivy League University affiliated site.
This is not the 1970s. Science has overthrown Political Correctness and everything has come full circle back to Darwin.
The morons of Political Correctness have no choice but to ignore the contradiction between existing science and their obsolete mumbo jumbo.
But science is prevailing. Not for any moral reason, but because there is big money to be made.
Political Correctness doesn’t have a chance. Not a chance in hell.
#9 by BGLass on 02/28/2010 - 8:44 am
It’s not just science. Some say 9-11 was pivotal, but 1995 turned a tide with undercurrents across disciplines. Things published in university/ms press, previously forbidden, new media available, cognitive psychology pushed out Freud, attempting to keep what was usable for genuine health, and so on. Now we’re stuck with bizarrely produced social sciences, lots of infrastructure, has-been headsets. The problem with “framing all sides of debate to control outcomes”—is they’re in echo chambers. PC chose to read false compliance as genuine submission for years. Nobody thought about the white children of affirmative action, not really, and it’s too late for studies now. The more this is realized, the more paranoia.
#10 by Tim on 02/28/2010 - 11:09 am
“9. Challenging Orthodoxy Is a Form of “Asymmetric Conflict”: You Win By “Not Losing.” When someone challenges a taboo or takes on some well-entrenched conventional wisdom, his or her opponents invariably have the upper hand at first. They will seek to silence or discredit you as quickly as they can, so that your perspective, which they obviously won’t like, does not gain any traction with the public. But this means that as long as you remain part of the debate, you’re winning. Minds don’t change overnight, and it is difficult to know how well an intellectual campaign is going at any particular point in time. So get ready for an emotional roller coaster-some days you might think you’re winning big, while other days the deck will appear to be stacked against you. But the real question is: are you still in the game? ”
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/02/22/on_grabbing_the_third_rail
The above is why we will win. WE are still in the game.
#11 by BGLass on 02/28/2010 - 11:42 am
Tim, that’s why I never understood why people are so hard on those who “don’t say everything,” or whatever, but who STAY POSITIONED. Look at guest #s on places s/a SF. Whites check in, to see if there’s a new game yet. Meantime, they play what is on the table. Sometimes, the game is staying in, staying positioned. If the game shifts, you go to a new position. A big shift, you get to say who you really are, maybe. And so on. But people are very hard on others. Some create places for them to move, some stay positioned. You never know who people are.