It is important to keep your thoughts disciplined in any discussion. When anyone talks about racism, you must remember to say, “What you mean is, what YOU CHOOSE TO CALL RACISM.”
Some female spouting the standard Hate line got cut to pieces by one of our people simply taking one of my quotes, saying she was just accusing us of being IGNUNT. Another of us buzzed in and made it clear that no one has a right to use insults on us any more than on anyone else.
I got the impression she was a bit shell-shocked as this went on.
You can do this, you can make them ALL feel shell shocked, if you stay disciplined. In the cases where you get a chance to hit back, don’t let anybody attack you as if they were being objective. They are saying that they hate anybody they choose to call a Racist.
That is very different from a racist, and you should remember that.
BoardAd has decided to do the same thing for Comments 3, leave it to you. You are doing a terrific job there. I don’t want to throw in something that might screw it up. But I am reading and really enjoying it.
In fact, the sort of point I just made could have appeared in Comments 3. And it is very important to realize that what is happening in Comments 3 is CRITICAL. I will be dead and frozen at some time, but the fact is, my peak passed years ago.
You must start taking over Now, and you have been. It never occurred to me that our fight, our real fight, our WHOLE fight, would end in my lifetime. If I were worried only about my lifetime, I wouldn’t dedicate my entire life to the preservation of my RACE.
But it is may be hard for you to empathize with how good it feels to have people working on cornering the other side with ruthless, disciplined points the way I have done all my life.
Sic ‘em.
Plot how to sic em. Practice siccing them, and report it in.
#1 by backbaygrouch4 on 03/23/2010 - 7:11 am
In the early 60s a radical group convinced the campus librarian to allow them to erect an anti Vietnam war display in the entrance. This irked me so i requested to be allowed a bit of space for my own display [under one square yard]. They had put a lot of effort and a few bucks into it and it showed. The center was a big , empty bomb shell. The retort was a folding chair, a dark piece cloth and a book with the large lettered title, Logic. beneath a small sign to the effect that there was an alternative to emotionalism when discussing policy. In a huff they removed their somewhat impressive display. They ran at the first whiff of return fire.
Most anti Whites are windbags. Their arguments are hot air. It only takes a wee pin to prick a big balloon.
#2 by Simmons on 03/23/2010 - 11:15 am
The Right naturally owns the internet, the old fossil white lib left owns the dying MSM.
Today I linked thru to an anti-white article at Salon and of the 70 posts 3/4 of them were written by the Amren crowd.
Of course they were in “tome” fashion and inherently correct but none was in BUGS fashion.
We are getting closer though.
#3 by BGLass on 03/23/2010 - 11:47 am
So many anti-white-whites s/a described would rather continue taking attacks seriously, perfecting themselves on that basis, than just slam opposition.
I met one who would get up hours early to stay current on languages, (so as not to be called a “xenophobe.”) Then she got a big job based in language acquisition skills, so deep down, she felt other people’s accusations had served her well. Had she just said, IN YOUR OPINON, I’m a xenophobe, she could have just gone to the beach.
As is, she denies the “secondary gain,” that OTHERS GET from this system of attacks–and tries to keep believing in her own superiority, as if she gets the most out of the sick deal.
Such (usually middle class) people see the alternative as actually falling into a mythologized working class, and becoming fat, beer-guzzling rednecks in a trailer park, just the way opposition projects.
They do suspect the (real, relative) IGNANCE of attackers, but feel they get the most out of the deal. Only when they see they are not “winners” do they WANT to use the mantra. Realizing others have been successful without allowing themselves to be degraded–it does really floor them. What could this girl have been interested in–other than languages (which is to say, xenophobia)?
#4 by Dave on 03/23/2010 - 3:36 pm
Never lose sight that we are fighting a cult, even though it is the Established Religion of the United States, it is nothing but a cult, pure and simple.
You can’t defeat cultists by immitating their behavior. The is what AmRen loses sight of.
Just confront them directly and simply. Cults never make sense. Reminding them their nonsense “is just their opinion” works magic.