Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

J. Edgar Hoover

Posted by Bob on March 25th, 2010 under Bob, Coaching Session, History

I have stayed ahead in daily articles until this bout with flu. The last time I dropped out for a while, BoardAd kept us running with Blasts From the Past, but he became very discouraged because our numbers dropped steeply.

Lots of people say size doesn’t matter.

But the competition between blogs is enormous, and if I am going to give up thinking and just repeat what I thought before, I might as well make money at it as a respectable conservative or get rich on it at the SPLC.

It is interesting how much one can tell about real history from the few times Politically Correctness shows MERCY to those it hates. They hate J. Edgar Hoover because he is seen as an enemy to the advocates of a People’s Peace Loving Democracy McCarthy attacked.

He criticized Saint Martin Luther the King because he kept open Communists as advisers. He even criticized Paul Robeson, whom the New York Times described in his obituary as “a lifetime advocate of human rights and a disciple of Joseph Stalin until his (Robeson‘s) death.”

What the media never mention is the reason why Hoover declared the Mafia to be a myth. It had nothing to do with his homosexuality. If the Mafia had a picture of his making love to his live-in Deputy head of the FBI, FBI experts would have declared it to be a made-up picture.

We are familiar enough with kept “science,” like Climategate, to know about this. We all know that the Genome Project will never say one thing that does not support Political Correctness. And where do did all local police, and even Interpol, send photographs to be verified?

To the FBI in Washington, of course.

So why is the media so uninterested in why Hoover declared that the mafia was scientifically proved to be a myth, just as the Genome Project says race is?

For very simple reason: the FBI wanted to look invincible, and Organized Crime was LOT bigger than the FBI was. So the FBI bought out white trash relatives of Klansmen and made huge progress in crushing a much smaller and more divided foe.

The media don’t want to criticize THAT.

But that was, for Hoover, a diversion. He knew what the media wanted, and the media didn’t care whether Organized Crime died or prospered. It wanted Southern resistance crushed.

Hoover was a master politician. Like Churchill, he did not care what he did to the world so long as he kept power. And unlike Churchill he DID keep power, whereas the world spit Churchill out.

The simple fact is that any attempt to deal with organized crime in Hoover’s time was doomed. So J. Edgar declared it a myth until that disastrous meeting in the mountains made it too obvious to declare mythological any more. But that was in the 50s, I believe.

Hoover was right. He couldn’t deal with Organized Crime. It was not until the passage of the RICO Acts that a crime boss could be charged EFFECTIVELY with crimes committed on his orders. The Warren Court worked desperately hard to defend all criminals, especially the big ones, and you couldn’t get anybody for drugs unless you found drugs ON them, and then it wasn’t easy.

No big man in the Mafia ever had drugs within a football field of him. So it was obvious that all the law enforcement agencies got nothing but small fry, and it didn’t look good. Hoover had been right to defend the Mafia all that time in order to keep his image.

Hoover was also as helpless against the Communists in the US as anyone else. He abandoned McCarthy. He wouldn’t have been surprised to know that practically everyone McCarthy accused turned up in KGB files, but that was not his problem.

Hoover wanted to do things that showed him invincible. Preferably things to media would LIKE. So he did that by buying off white trash.

  1. #1 by Dave on 03/25/2010 - 10:23 am

    The important message here for us BUGSTERS is that the Federal police are weak. I don’t care if it is the Secret Service, the ATF, the FBI, or whoever, these are weak and ineffective forces.

    The Federal Prosecutors can bust whoever they like, but they have to triage, as their caseload is endless.

    So, in a larger sense, it is all a bunch of bluster, without real substance, something successful criminals are well aware of.

  2. #2 by Simmons on 03/25/2010 - 10:38 am

    They’re an one shot outfit staffed by time servers waiting for the day they can get their lucrative pensions.

    Still I don’t think we should hide from them, I think we should recruit some of them.

  3. #3 by Simmons on 03/25/2010 - 11:25 am

    Basically our side is clueless on how to deal with the beuracracy. Take Jared Taylor’s response on being told verbally to buzz off and he took it like a respectable.

    When dealing with a gooberment type always insist that it be put into writing, this scares a time server like nothing else, admitable evidence.

    But poor Jared he accepted being “told” that we are not a “protected” class, and that was it and all perfectyly deniable, gooberment agents live for that.

    Same with v-dare’s Sailer moaned about the Fedgov’s policy of putting white men dead last in the fed caste system for contract consideration, but refused to actually quote the statute that details this policy, instead he went on to something else to prove his intellect.

    Same with Covington, said he was denied Medicaid because of his race but refused to actualy ask for the statute to read it for himself or to have the gooberment agent put it in writing, instead onto something else.

    At my youtube debat with a nice young white male traitor I am quoting Obama policy matching it with Mantra, and it would be a hell of lot more help if our sources with more resources would get the paper trail of our genocide.

    rant off

  4. #4 by Simmons on 03/25/2010 - 11:32 am

    Bob if you can go to this thread expand to read all the comments and find MrMantraMan’s comments your critique would be appreciated.

  5. #5 by shari on 03/25/2010 - 1:41 pm

    Simmons, here’s some in writing info. Disparate Impact provides the legal justification to “monitor compliance”, “assess fairness”, and “monitor racial disparities”, discriminating in favor of “protected classes”:
    Under Title VII of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, plaintiffs may sue employers who discriminate on the basis of race, color, gender, religion, or national origin. Employers who intentionally discriminate are obvious candidates for a lawsuit, but the courts also allow plaintiffs to prove liability if the employer has treated classes of people differently using apparently neutral employment policies. The disparate impact theory of liability will succeed if the plaintiff can prove that these employment policies had the effect of excluding persons who are members of Title VII’s protected classes. Once disparate impact is established, the employer must justify the continued use of the procedure or procedures causing the adverse impact as a “business necessity.”
    This legal theory has the effect of excluding Whites.

  6. #6 by Simmons on 03/25/2010 - 2:05 pm

    Close Shari, what is needed is a specific statement excluding whites it must be explicitly stated and in writing. As is it is allowing a hack to interpret without consequence. No hack will sweat writing those opinions but they would if they had to explicitly write them down.

    But our side so desperate to impress runs to the very next thing to prove their intellect. When what is needed is in writing.

    CofCC did this a month ago, a writer mentioned the Fedgov contracting racial caste system but did not explicitly state in what statute or rule it is written. They blew it, now when we debate what we have to put out seems more like our opinion of a situation not a law codified by government.

    thanks though

  7. #7 by Dave on 03/25/2010 - 3:25 pm


    The Federal police aren’t weak because of their personnel. The FBI, Secret Service, and AFT have very high hiring and personnel standards. As individuals, Federal cops are pretty impressive. Their work is also fun and exciting, so I don’t think they are drones waiting for pensions.

    The problem is automation hasn’t really reached them because computers have to be a whole lot more powerful to handle biometrics.

    Another issue is that forensic auditing and investigation software is where spreadsheet software was in 1980.

    Once the computers and software evolve to the point of really enabling automated investigations, the Federal police are going to become a lot more fearsome.

    The prosecution bottleneck will also be relieved at that point, because all the Federal cops will have to do to ruin your life is put a status on you that you are under investigation.

  8. #8 by woundednietzsche on 03/25/2010 - 9:11 pm

    The Feds would indeed be fearsome in the future if they were to remain racially neutral (anti-white) like they are now. They won’t be. The future is turning out to be hyper-racial and their systems are designed to operate in a colorblind world.

    White men keep the lights on and they are defecting from this system in droves. A system that works against every interest they have. I think we’ve reached a tipping point where most whites have finally realized there’s not going to be any racial nirvana.

    For example, Human Bio Diversity (HBD) blogs are exploding, filled with intelligent race realists who don’t give a rat’s ass about PC. Their detractors call them sophisticated racists.

    They are ready to see the real endgame being played, genocide of the white race.

You must be logged in to post a comment.