Conservatives are constantly bitching about how liberals are getting absolutely absurd in their use of the word “racist.”
One liberal’s advice they quote was, “Pick a conservative and cal him a racist.”
But the respectables never talk about WHY liberals are now so blatant about the racist label.
They use it because it WORKS.
And they will keep using it because it WORKS.
We have a simple truth to get across: “I wish for liberals to say I am a non-racist but the only reason they will say that is because I am a groveling wimp.”
Liberals use the anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews gambit all the time because it WORKS. Whenever they use it, conservatives soil themselves and go into a fetal position.
If you found something that did that to your opponents, you would use it endlessly, you would openly urge your allies to use it. Liberals kept using the racist label on the Tea Party and the Tea Party put out tapes of their meetings to show no one used the N word.
It didn’t help.
Hey, dumbo, this is a WAR, not a high school DEBATE! Unlike groveling respectables, liberals don’t give a damn about you proving them wrong. All that counts is whether they WIN or not.
That’s why they always win over the respectables. The only time conservatives won was when they got over their fear of appealing to the “the Wallace vote,” a phrase the left used to scare conservatives away from the Reagan Democrats for many years.
The Republicans went back to moderation with Bush and became habitual losers again, doing the job the media feels a real conservative SHOULD do.
When Republicans looked like they had some cajones again in 1994, they won BOTH Houses of Congress. But once in office, they danced to the tune of the Democratic attacks again, and lost it again.
Republicans who won the smashing victory of 1994 went Inside the Beltway. They were listening to the Washington Post and the cocktail party crowd, which cowed them with the racist and radical labels on a day to day basis.
Only on their trips back to their districts, talking with people who weren’t the Big Shots they now dealt with, did they hear, “Why aren’t you CHANGING anything up there?”
They didn’t change even the trend to more government up there because the Big Guys inside the Beltway are Big Guys because they know how to manipulate wimps.
And if you wet yourself and praise Martin Luther King ensconced in the idea that liberals were always right the pros are going to keep using any label that WORKS.
#1 by BGLass on 09/21/2010 - 8:39 am
Anyone who was really trying to have a real conversation would concede the point and move on.
Like, “Yes, yes. You have already summed up my character. You clearly know all about me, whether we have even ever met or not, and besides which, you say that about EVERYONE who doesn’t agree with you, so how truly specific could it be to me. Still, you know everything on this point…”
“SO BE THAT AS IT MAY…” and then just move onto whatever you were trying to talk about.
This is how one knows conservatives do not really wish to have a conversation about any real issues. They drown in defending their individual supposed morality, instead.
Instead of saying, “Yes, yes, yes. But BE THAT AS IT MAY, WE MUST discuss X, which is why we are here today….”
Just concede the point and move on. The only possible conversation if one doesn’t will be circular, counter-productive, and only a defense to personal name calling.
“I won’t even grace that with a response!” in a moral tone can be helpful, also. So “let’s move on!”
“That is a shut-up word,” so let’s move on. We must discuss…
“Unfortunately, our time together is far too limited for me to become involved in circular “conversations” defending my personal honor, and I’m sure you, too, wish to move on, to discuss the much more pertinent issue of….”
The personal attack on my honor is not even worth defending in light of the much more crucial national issue that we are trying to address…
Dear Lord, maybe conservatives should read some Charles Dickens or Jane Austin novels or something for help in their sentence constructions.
It does seem wealthy conservatives, like on t.v. –for all their supposed advantages– did not have families that taught them conversation-starters (and how to circumvent conversation-enders), or maybe they did not have access to libraries and novels written in an era when people really knew how to use the English language to its best advantage— maybe one has to be born a redneck for that, lol.
#2 by Dick_Whitman on 09/21/2010 - 9:21 am
BGLass,
Great points. In the past (after being called a racist) I’ve said:
“calling me a “racist” (I use air quotes for “racist”) doesn’t change the fact that there’s a program of genocide against the White race.”
I then go into the Mantra.
#3 by Simmons on 09/21/2010 - 9:29 am
The Left is about setting taboos in front of us or whoever. “King’s new clothes” and all, and the respectables are there to honor those taboos though they have even less clues than the left cult kids of why or who sets those taboos.
Problem being is that our side honors them, take that SPLC outfit, even the Semis go fetal in their fashion if you mention the SPLC, and I’ll tell you how and what it has to do with taboo.
No one ever mentions that the SPLC is an anti-white outfit because it is offlimits only Mommy Prof. approved style of debate is allowed which requires a gentleman to provide a mindnumbing amount of facts. We are trained that a Lefty can only be wrong never evil and a right winger is probably evil though he can repudiate in some cases and become “respectable.” Therefore taboos are set in these kinds of conditions as if automatic.
You can test this out, find one of our semis such as Jared Taylor and ask him if the people such as the SPLC cultists are evil. His training, and he has been trained will have him answer, No. Ask the SPLC if JT is evil and their training will have them answer, Yes, because they have been trained.
To either side to answer differently is to cross Taboo.
#4 by OldBlighty on 09/21/2010 - 10:52 am
If they go the school yard route, you can do the same and turn it back on them, exposing their anti-White racism to both themselves and their friends, with this mini mantra:
“In your opinion, I’m a racist.
You’re just calling me that because I’m White.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.”
It works for all of the attack words and racial slurs they use against White people, who are concerned about the disappearance of their race.
Would you argue with someone that is trying to kill you? Of course not! So why argue with those that are trying to genocide your race?