When people talk about big happenings, they want big causes. When Kennedy was shot, no one wanted to attribute that to one lone nut job, especially a Communist nut job.
That is a major reason conspiracy theories flourished.
That is what makes BUGS so hard to sell. No one wants to hear that the historical catastrophes we have seen were the result of simple causes. No one wants to hear that all that complicated talk about race relations just comes down the Final Solution to the White Problem.
I just wrote a piece here about how television was monomaniacally New York-centered from the history of granting licenses. The average person who hobbies in politics would say that is a cute observation and go on to Big Stuff.
In big historical events, people associate realism with Big Stuff. Reality is not made of Big Stuff. Reality has a lot of Big Stuff, medium stuff, and tiny stuff. The catch is that when you talk about the little stuff, like TV programming, very few people want to hear about it.
Which means their picture of the world is completely unreal. If a plane goes down, it may be the result of a terrorist plot or it may be a tiny piece of defective equipment like the one that knocked out all power in the entire Northeastern United States for hours in the 1960s.
If that happened today a dozen books would come out showing it was Arabs.
The article about early New York provincialism in TV programming was written to DEMONSTRATE the truth that no one is as provincial as a rube who thinks he’s sophisticated.
The rule here is that you don’t reach reality by searching for excitement. You could have talked yourself blue about Arab Terrorist Plots or some other Great Conspiracy causing that Blackout, but the fact is that the blackout would have continued until you replaced that one little switch.
Our movement can get lots of membership with News and Jews. But it will get nowhere until it gets to the basics.
I have spent over a decade trying to get them to change that one switch. I will probably literally die trying.
#1 by BGLass on 11/09/2010 - 11:08 am
Lots of kids in school secretly took Oswald at his word –since they were also taught that Freud (who was a God), said “sometimes a cigar is just a cigar”— so the real lesson was they weren’t supposed to SAY a communist was involved, even if HE said he was, and teachers don’t think, so they didn’t think about the implications:
If a communist did in the president and right after that, another swept in with socialist wealth distribution, (the sixties), and yet kids were supposed to say “communism” was bad and something U.S. fought (in Vietnam, Korea, S. America, etc.), then who’s to say pogroms hadn’t ALREADY happened in the U.S., if one was born AFTER the “revolutionary” U.S. changes? –(as kids were told occurred in Russia and China?)
Was their own country like Russia and China, where they were taught millions vanished, records were erased, and no one was supposed to say anything? If it happened there, why not the U.S.? Millions vanished and yet people walked around like nothing was happening, kids were taught.
So: How else could the U.S. “unprecedented demographic shift” (acknowledged by politicians openly building non-white vote and t.v. pundits) occur in a only 45 years? Where did the people who lived in U.S. before…GO, those who were white and many even the worst of enemy-types (WASPs?) Any “wasps” should distance themselves for survival’s sake, obviously.
What would be the fate of white kids who didn’t go along with the “browning of America” that was talked about in school and on t.v.? Either way –if they went along or not– they were extinguished. So, it would make sense if some kids wondered if pogroms hadn’t ALREADY occurred, as that would explain demographic changes, as they were taught in school had happened in East Europe.
Surely, they were being taught so much about East Europe and China, b/c it had to do WITH THEM, with their own situation. If “closed societies” really existed—were teachers secretly saying we were one? Were others free? Us really behind the “iron curtain?” Where had the millions of whites from before GONE?
#2 by shari on 11/09/2010 - 2:55 pm
I had this conversation this morning with my husband. He said, so is Tim Wise a jew? I said apparantly, but I don’t care if he is or isn’t, He’s anti-white. He SAYS so, that’s all I need to know. All lefty spokespersons are COMMIES. All of them are anti-white. Don’t let anybody say they aren’t against ALL white people, and then say they are only against white people on the right. That doesn’t make any sense.
Also don’t let anybody tell you, they are Consevative, but say we are a melting pot. Maybe THEY are a melting pot, but everyone cannot be, because the end is GENOCIDE.
#3 by Wandrin on 11/10/2010 - 10:50 am
“When people talk about big happenings, they want big causes.”
Yes but that works both ways. When people think there’s a small problem they’ll only accept a small cause. People currently close to the mainstream who only see a small problem can currently only be reached initially with either a small cause or no explicit cause at all e.g the Mantra, but eventually when they start to realise how BIG this is – the genocide of an entire segment of humanity – then i think they need a bigger cause.
Could be wrong.