Lysenko Lesson I explained how the suppression of free speech in the USSR led Stalin to force millions of already near starving peasants to plant summer wheat in the winter. Where there is no free speech, the word “experiment” is banned.
So Lysenko’s declaration that summer wheat would LEARN to be winter wheat if planted for the winter was not a theory to be subjected to small-scale experiments before it was unleashed to starve millions of peasants.
Lysenko’s statements were Marxist Orthodoxy. To experiment with it would have been a crime.
Lysenko Lesson II is how Stalin came to turn all of Soviet agriculture over to a basket case. It relates to the Six Million Laws in Europe. Soviet agriculture was declared subject to Marxist thinking, so it was not tested. So summer wheat seed was destroyed by planting it at the wrong time because, according to Marxism, it would LEARN to be winter wheat.
At this moment, Europe is declaring that there are no Danish people and no German people. All are evil because of the six million Jews, and not one less, that were killed by the Nazis. Orthodoxy Laws, which starved million of peasants, now declare that the highest goal of European culture is its own destruction.
So we all know what anyone means when they say “The Six Million.” They know the Six Million because it is shouted from every rooftop that any champion of any white nation is a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
Hitler is Mommy Professor’s meal ticket.
Lysenko caused the death of millions and his name is almost completely unknown, and less so every year.
He embarrasses Mommy Professor. There is no law on earth against anyone’s underestimating the deaths Lysenko caused.
There is no law anywhere on earth against underestimating the number of Ukrainians Stalin killed.
In fact, few people today know who Lysenko WAS.
But the lesson is that Lysenko is not DISCUSSED. Lysenko Lesson III is SILENCE.
When we were able to look into the KGB files and found that the people Joseph McCarthy called Communists really WERE Communists, no one rushed to defend those who had attacked McCarthy.
The term “McCarthyism” simply stopped being used.
When Solzhenitsyn wrote about the Soviet Gulags and the millions who died there, European Intellectuals, who had laughed at the idea of Soviet atrocities, suddenly recognized them. It is now forgotten that Intellectuals ever denied Stalin’s atrocities.
When Lysenko died, the only information on him National Review knew about was in my first book. Their Lysenko obituary was almost entirely from my book, including one error.
During all the years of the Cold War, National Review had long, intellectual discussions of the moral shortcomings of Communism. I kept trying to get them to discuss the simple fact that every Communist country had to keep its people from escaping by threat of death.
Mommy Professor did not discuss the Berlin Wall and all the other walls that encircled every Communist country.
So National Review did not discuss the Berlin Wall and all the other walls that encircled every Communist country
Mommy Professor does not discuss the simple evil of his beliefs. Respectable conservatives are selected for respectability because they are the people who forget everything Mommy Professor needs forgotten.
Respectable conservatives are the ones who ignore that all this multiracialism and multiculturalism is aimed ONLY at white countries and at ALL white countries. Like any other organized crime, they observe the Code of Silence.
#1 by BGLass on 01/06/2011 - 10:14 am
People seem so sincere in their attempts to reintroduce terminology sometimes. It’s easier to make jokes than write mega-tomes like “The Black Book of Communism.” —just make a joke on Lysenko ten times a day, like at cash registers in shops. Like, ‘he was a total Lysenko, lmao! What? Ur kidding? You never heard of Lysenko! Omg!” Making names bywords in another context is good. People love good cut-downs. A main message of Mr. Whistaker is repeaters work.
#2 by shari on 01/06/2011 - 10:19 am
This really IS the crime of the past century, and Lysenko’s children are still with us.
#3 by BGLass on 01/06/2011 - 10:43 am
The whole lingo in psychology of the “false self” works well with them. The headset needed to allow the starving to plant winter wheat in summer, is a fragile shell over the brain. Beneath it, can be a rage so long unspoken that it has no words—year of names, dates, times, places of things that frightened one, or that one saw destroyed, or whatever.
Psychology (that holds the “spirituality” offered to the masses)— holds deeply that things CAN ONLY and ever be explored in terms of the individual self (mommy’s and daddy’s did something bad to you; or you had a bad boo-boo trauma in your past, and by “opening that” (making you “abreact” and live that over and over in imagination, we will use that vulnerability to “re-educate you” and “make interventions” that are “healthier.”
But the subtext —and only real message— of psychology is that SOCIETY cannot be questioned, can never be at fault, that policies can never cause any discomfort, that there are no significant agents (agencies, workers, etc.) outside your own personal family. THUS they hate their own families. (This is a main component to the rejection of one’s own family simultaneously).
Everyone knows this. Even the general public. And books are written on it. But it seems the alternative (the looking at real players in practical politics, which is the alternative to the bad-daddy scene)— is maybe too shattering and painful for many, no matter how much information the ostrich babies get. Tragic.
#4 by shari on 01/06/2011 - 11:40 am
Here’s a cut-dowm. Lysenko Gribbon and New Lysenko South Books. They censer Mark Twain in order change history to their Lysenko,anti-white, views.
#5 by BGLass on 01/06/2011 - 12:33 pm
Comrade Gribbon’s Anti-white New Lysenko Books. Good b/c “New South” is a senseless term. And really bad for Catholics. It has sort of subtextually come to mean them as spearhead. Like where they go in, usually due to “business development, (are offered jobs) but then are used to bring “Mexicans,” as if they can even pretend these myriad “Catholicisms” are even vaguely alike (eg: trad Catholics v Liberation Theology), and so on.
New South is used to mean “new Catholic south,” like neo-carpet-bagging, and so on. It furthers the N/S European issues, which is not good. Sunic had a Southern guy on, talking about some of those tensions.
It’s part of ongoing “reconstruction”, (white genocide). If “New South” is someone else’s name— what would be the white name for it?
There’s old South, reconstruction south, now this “new south,” (for which so many plans are made).
The Northerners who are sent there need to consider whether they are really the “end game” there.
#6 by Simmons on 01/06/2011 - 3:22 pm
Bob I was reading on another site about food shortages and someone brought it up that the Soviets succesfully voided the effort to insert the word “political” into the UN Charter on Genocide so as to avoid the charges against them for their crimes.
I’m to also understand that the Russians in recent years crushed the Ukranian effort to get the famine labled as a genocide because the Ruskies sucessfully turned it into a “Political” act and not a racial/ethnic act on the Soviets part.
Somewhere I’m sensing opportunity here.
#7 by Genseric on 01/06/2011 - 6:24 pm
[quote]Mommy Professor does not discuss the simple evil of his beliefs. Respectable conservatives are selected for respectability because they are the people who forget everything Mommy Professor needs forgotten.
Respectable conservatives are the ones who ignore that all this multiracialism and multiculturalism is aimed ONLY at white countries and at ALL white countries. Like any other organized crime, they observe the Code of Silence.[/quote]
So, the more silent they remain the more respectable they are and subsequently the more SUCCESSFUL they become.
I am willing to observe the Code of Silence. But, only for my own interest and more importantly for the interest of the people with the ‘right’ scruples.
MYSELF. MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS. MY FAMILY. MY RACE. MY GOD (and not in that order, in case you were wondering).
But, I am definitely not a ‘respectable conservative’ by any stretch of the imagination.
Here’s to silence in small doses and to using it only at the utmost opportune of times.
#8 by Epiphany on 01/07/2011 - 5:49 am
They do not wish for the Soviet Crimes to be remembered. But, we shall remember them!
#9 by Epiphany on 01/07/2011 - 5:51 am
We have to let people remember the plight of White Gentiles at the hands of the Soviet Communists!
#10 by jo3w on 06/14/2013 - 10:11 pm
I think it would be funny if we INSISTED that 100 million jooz were gassed in the holocaust. What would be the concequence of that? Force a law that if someone says less than 100 million were killed then they would go to jail. Am I the only one who would find that funny?