Lord Nelson made a temporary error which I have described repeatedly. The fact that it was an error is the least important thing about it.
You will not believe this, but even Bob, The Old Man on the Mountain Himself, as made many, many worse errors than this.
In fact, some of the things I have done were bad enough to make the mere term “mistake” inappropriate. I have often done things that can only be described in terms and language that do not appear in BUGS.
After all, there are ladies present. Sometimes you have to sacrifice accuracy for decency.
But every time I seek to correct someone’s approach, I think of the ideal way in which Lord Nelson handled this one. He was doing an excellent job in Stormfront’ Opposing Views section, and he was naturally doing what went over most easily.
Lord Nelson was translating the Mantra as only saying that white countries were being overwhelmed by non-whites. That is not the only thing the Mantra attacks. The major lesson in personal terms is that Lord Nelson simply accepted the criticism and changed that policy.
LN’s interest is not in being always right, but in the cause, and the cause only, ego be damned. His reaction is one major lesson of this incident.
But there is another lesson here. Lord Nelson did not realize that the reason he was finding this much easier going was because he was sticking to immigration, since even a Teapot Twit can criticize THAT, and he was not hitting the REAL Hot Button.
The real hot button, what we used to call the third rail, the middle one on the subway which carried the electricity that could kill you, goes under the name of “assimilation.”
A brave man has come out in Norway and written an attack on anti-racism in OUR terms. This is a big breakthrough, not least because he is braving a prison sentence in doing so, but, if you read the quotes very carefully, which is what I made a major part of my living doing, You will see a version of Lord Nelson one failing.
Our brave Norseman makes it plain that “anti-racism” is, as we have been saying for years, an anti-white campaign. I think that, given where he is, it is wise to avoid criticizing interracial marriage per se.
This is wise ONLY SO LONG AS WE NEVER FORGET THE REALITY WE ARE HOLDING BACK.
Language is a product of USE. A person who marries a non-white produces only non-white children. Anti-whites have completely given up the attempt to make blacks out to be as smart as whites, and have fallen back completely on suppression of any discussion of this issue.
Our Norwegian hero even dared to bring up the point we have been making, NOT COINCIDENTALLY, for many years: No one can look at an Olympic-level hundred yard dash and not notice that every runner from Sweden or the Netherlands or Nigeria, is the same color.
If race is only skin-deep, the skin must have a hell of an effect on the legs.
I do not think we can overestimate the importance of what this Nordic intellectual is doing. This is real, bare-knuckled intellectualism, not Mommy Professors ordained crowd of moo-cows in our established religion.
Everyone knows what a black world would look like. If you don’t there are planes leaving for Africa every day. But the third rail is mentioning what a MIXED world would be like.
Once again, there are planes leaving for brown countries every day. There are taxis and subways headed for colored areas every day.
The Economic Line is the Color Line. Mexicans break into America, not for multiculturalism, but for what has been built by that which is called uniculturalism and is actually monoracialism.
No one is allowed to dispute the statement that the children of a marriage do not matter. The doctrine says that all that matters is that, at one given moment, the black and the blond are “in love” with one another. What happens to the children is absolutely forbidden for conversation.
And for now some of us may have to settle for that or go to prison.
But the bottom line is that the ultimate goal of anti-whites is not a colored majority, it is to transform every white country into a COLORED country.
THAT is Prize their eyes are on, and that is Prize we seek to deny them at any cost.
#1 by Simmons on 01/07/2011 - 11:59 am
The Left is so easily defeated here it is suprising that we are having such fits over this issue.
“I want the best for my children and it starts with genetics.”
The only ones who will object will be the gray haired old ladies who fancy themselves “free thinkers” and the jews who really think the gentiles are the “mud people” that yaweh commands the jews to shape.
The gray haired old ladies are pitiful fools, the jews and their cult who adapted their religion to the Blank Slate Theory with them as the shapers are evil.
No whining allowed, I hate whining.
#2 by Dave on 01/07/2011 - 4:52 pm
“On the Internet nobody knows you are a dog.” I found this out the other day when a female blogger whose posts I very much enjoy made the mistake of posting a picture of herself blowing my whole UNREALISTIC image of her. I was sooooo disappointed.
The subject of genetic inheritance is the world’s most PAINFUL subject. Political Correctness’s ridiculous take on race and equality could not exist if it were not for that fact.
Few people ever come to grips with it the way my old friend Dwayne did, who was unbelievably ugly and also had a tendency to slobber: “When you are born ugly you are going to be ugly the rest of your life so you might as well get used to it.” There are a lot of people in this world, male and female, who would melt down into hysterics if I told them that.
Political Correctness has it that MANKIND suffers from prudishness about sex. No way! That never was a fact. It isn’t a fact. And it never will be a fact.
The truth is that MANKIND suffers from prudishness about genetic inheritance, which the lion’s share of us REFUSE to confront because the whole subject is so damn painful. This has always been a fact, is today a fact, and will remain a fact.
Our dominant response is, “Best not talk about it”, proving were the real prudishness lay.
#3 by BGLass on 01/07/2011 - 7:16 pm
Whatever. Those most hurt are the ones who would have been really happy with their natural gifts. They are hated for no reason they can ever figure out, and at best, just keep harping on some flaw they don’t even really have, since that sometimes staves off attacks. It’s just too strange that someone could be hated for what is supposed to be good. That’s why some start saying in America “what’s bad is good and what’s good is bad” (like in “art”). This is an attempt to process this envy that runs everything, maybe.
Everybody always talks about greed. But greed doesn’t make people spend (they are told to spend to “keep it all going.”) It’s just a job stated by governance, not greed, or ego. Envy is now sometimes attributed to pissed off whites, but it’s not really what they’re feeling. They don’t want to be other people, they want their own stuff back that they feel fooled out of.
#4 by timeforfreedom on 01/11/2011 - 7:54 pm
This is an excellent article because it points out the reason that our people are so angry about the forced immigration, that is of course, because it is a method of choice for the anti-White anglo-elites to force-assimilate out of existence the Caucasian peoples of the Earth….FOREVER. Whenever I say these words I simply seethe with rage at these vile pigs. There are growing number of us that will do absolutely anything to drag this scum into tribunal after tribunal.