Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Silence is Consent

Posted by Bob on January 10th, 2011 under Coaching Session

When you have hit somebody with the Mantra and will not back away from their seeing it, a silence begins. It is the silence every experienced questioner knows, be he priest or policeman.

When you hit near the nub, you can tell generally where that nub is. The person on the other side begins to say he already answered that when he hasn’t or that it has already been dealt with, which it hasn’t.

This last is a good trick, because your refusing to stop making the basic point, over and over and over, gives him a chance to say that, somewhere in all your repetitions and his attempts to get around the point, there was an answer.

It is important for you to know this is a regular trick.

But it is also an example of Mantra Thinking. When I bring it up specifically we all know that when the police get down to the real thing, a felon will stop talking. He at least gets surly, as if talking hurts him.

And now we get back to the nub of Mantra Thinking: We all know it, but we don’t THINK about it.

By now we all know that no one is going to deal with Mantra, because it is so clearly true. So by now we should be thinking a little about the nature of the silence — and the silencing — which every guilty person uses when he is caught red-handed.

Silence sometimes takes the form of a scream. On every University campus is a resident group of thugs who will shout down the Mantra or anything that Mommy Professor wants suppressed. Like Al Capone, Mommy Professor will disavow all knowledge and have an alibi.

As I say, people all know something but they never THINK about it. They bitch about their taxes being high and they know that anyone saying anything disagreeable to the establishment will be shouted down, but it never occurs to them that they SHOULDN’T be financing a so-called university where all dissent is shouted down.

It took me years to get the Mantra into the form in which any possible response was already covered in the Mantra itself. After a couple of forceful repeats showing that was said in the Mantra and we’ve all heard it a million times, he retreats into silence and trying to change the subject.

I repeat, this is the same silence you run into if you are questioning someone and begin to show you know they did it and how you can prove it.

Getting them to confess is the next step. But no one is going to confess when he has the whole backing of those in power behind his lie.

When the confessing begins, the whole game will be up.

  1. #1 by Creator on 01/10/2011 - 12:10 pm

    Thank you Bob.
    Yet again you expanded my mind with pointing out the obvious as I am starting to experiencing this silence when using the Mantra on anti-whites, but didn’t realize or really think about what was happening. This article comes at a perfect time for me.

  2. #2 by Simmons on 01/10/2011 - 12:24 pm

    Disputing the “facts” like our semi-respectables do might be necessary, but in this phase it is a bit redundant. It is like saying in 1985 that Soviet toilet paper is rough.

    Call the “facts” the preliminary investigation, the Bugsters Mantra the interogation phase that will morph into the prosecution phase.

  3. #3 by shari on 01/10/2011 - 12:37 pm

    Anti-whites can be silent, still, no incident leaves all the facts unnoticed anymore.

  4. #4 by Lord Nelson on 01/10/2011 - 2:17 pm

    Below is a short excert, showing an Anti-White being interogated on youtube. Evantually the Anti-White caved in. Only to re-appear later and start its cr@p all over again.

    I think one problem is we still have too much respect for these sick fools. And feel the need to justify everything we say when they ask us to.

    Me and Adheleim hope to record a podcast about this very subject soon. If it turns out okay, and people think it may be of use. We will make it available to download.



    We are trying to understand if you are really just an Anti-White racist. Or if you are equally against other races too.

    That’s why Innerstein asked you this question:

    “So you would not object to replacing all black people with white people (non violent)? Since you are “against ethnic nationalism”…

    Please answer!
    WiiiRRRttyy 1 day ago
    WiiiRRRttyy 1 day ago

    @WiiiRRRttyy The question doesn’t make sense… how the fuck do you replace an entire group of people with another group of people non-violently?
    Madfoot713 1 day ago
    Madfoot713 1 day ago


    @WiiiRRRttyy It’s a loaded question. I told you, I’m against ethnic nationalism.
    Madfoot713 1 day ago
    Madfoot713 1 day ago


    Like I already said: We are just trying to understand if you are really just an Anti-White racist. Or if you are equally against other races too.

    That’s why we want you to answer the question::

    “So you would not object to replacing all black people with white people (non violent)? Since you are “against ethnic nationalism”…

    Please answer
    WiiiRRRttyy 1 day ago
    WiiiRRRttyy 1 day ago

  5. #5 by seriouswon on 01/10/2011 - 4:55 pm

    I have seen the silence many times on the internet. The person often disappears, changes the topic, insults your intelligence or even erases all previous posts. The hardest part for me is to not be “clever” with fancier arguments at that point. I need to just repeat the point over and over again.

    • #6 by OldBlighty on 01/10/2011 - 6:56 pm

      A strategy I have seen used to great effect, is to decode what the anti-white is actually saying and repeat it back to them over and over, as if you are gathering evidence for a prosecution.

      As the mantra points out, these Anti-Whites only ever say:

      “Only white people don’t exist and only white people don’t have countries.”

      That is quite obviously genocide.

      So when you make it clear you are not arguing in defense of white people, you are just collecting evidence for a future prosecution, you reach the silence stage very quickly.

  6. #7 by backbaygrouch on 01/10/2011 - 5:58 pm

    Back during the heyday of anti-Vietnam agitation there were several riots in Boston. A lot of easily mislead college kids got police records that surely did not stand them well in later life. Not a few were expelled from their colleges and had explain to dad about the wasted tuition money.

    No man riled the impressionable youth more than the left’s Boston University’s archetypical Mommy Professor Howard Zinn, a Jewish pseudo historian. He led a magic life. He was never arrested. Yet he was present at almost all the disorderly events and was the numero uno agitator.


    Simple. He always brought along a couple of look outs who would signal when the cops were coming. At this point Mommy Professor would skedaddle. A police record was for the little people, the adoring students. He was never caught red handed. And that took careful planning.

    One characteristic of a true Mommy Professor is important to remember. When push comes to shove he will equivocate, he will lie, he will fall silent and then he will run away This is because at heart MP is a coward. He is afraid of the Mantra.

  7. #8 by Simmons on 01/11/2011 - 11:02 am

    BBG I believe it to be true that Jim Jones had to be forced to drink the poison by his armed cult minders. Wordism being a manifestation of cult behavior, cults being formed to avoid responsibility.

You must be logged in to post a comment.