When I was in their grad school the University of Virginia was one of the few economics departments that adhered to supply and demand. In fact, the Modern Economics of the other schools at that time would be laughed at today.
The basic answer was simple to us. We developed the field of Public Choice and two of my professors won Nobel Prizes in the field. Instead of backing away from supply and demand as was fashionable at the time, Public Choice extended the logic of supply and demand to political and other human behavior.
One of my colleagues there in the year before me became Director of Management and Budget. Another, Craig Roberts, became editor of the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal and went on from there.
My point is that this was a powerful bunch of minds that did not need complications to look smart. This is background to the following incident.
I was in the UVA grad school almost fifty years ago. A New Zealander who was part Maori asked what was wrong with intermarriage. For once a fellow grad student answered him before I did.
He said, “It’s ugly.”
I have never been able to improve on that.
The problem with what I call a Jewish Wet Dream, the black guy with the beautiful blonde that Hugh Hefner promotes so assiduously, is that it is ugly. The black guy is being sure that will be no more beautiful blondes from her.
People are always telling you loudly what Reality is. Some drunken guy at a convention kept screaming that “Mao said that power comes from the barrel of a gun!!” The guy in a bar nursing the last drink he can afford will tell you all about how everything is about money.
The term Political Correctness is purely and absolutely a Marxist term. The idea that everything is about money has penetrated our society so deeply that we don’t see its origins. But the whole world view on which Marxism is based, that social animals share all things communally and are equal so only man’s institutions make us unequal and warlike and so forth, all that has been obliterated like a horse that sat on top of the Big Bang.
Money is like water. It is enormously important if you don’t have any. But it would hard to distinguish Bill Gate’s life from that of a man with a thousandth as much money as he has.
Among desert Arabs and American Westerners, water has indeed been everything.
I once pointed out to grad student at another university that apartheid South Africa had a major immigration problem. Blacks were pouring in from all the Liberated States, and the Zulus and other indigenous groups were raising hell about it because it impacted THEIR wages and employment.
The grad student, a girl, stuck out her lower lip and replied, “The black immigrants are NOT approving of South African apartheid. They’re just there for food.”
My reply caused a lot of laughter among the students around us: “You know, when you’re starving, food can be pretty important.”
There was no serious hunger in Rhodesia. There IS starvation, the real thing, not just malnutrition, in Zimbabwe.
The African Liberation anti-whites were so desperate to achieve doesn’t get much attention now. It wouldn’t take much publicity for people to conclude that having a black leadership becomes unimportant when food becomes everything.
Nature in humans has one real imperative. For dogs it is the production of offspring who have your smell. For eye-oriented humans, it is the production of people who LOOK like you.
When it comes to Hugh Hefner and all the anti-whites, with all my years of experience, I cannot improve on the two words, “It’s ugly.”
#1 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 6:09 am
Race Mixing will not lead to one, vast Brown Race, but rather many, many hybrid races, that will have to form some type of hierarchical structure. This is how the Indian Caste system developed.
Also, the ligher skinned blacks treat the darker skinned blacks like dirt. They are far more cruel to their darker brothers and sisters than we would care to be. Still, it is never termed “racism” when blacks victimize other blacks. After all, Racist is a code word for White Person. I realize that now.
We can keep on at it, until the end. And, I am sure that most Blacks realize that they are being used by the Jews.
#2 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 6:15 am
Would it not be quite a surprise to the Jews, that once everyone else is race mixed together, that first, it is not one, vast brown race, but many different hybrid races, forming a Caste system, and second, the Jews realize that they do not get to be at the top of the new Caste pyramid, but are rather the outcasts.
That would be very poetic. We know that they want the rest of us to Race Mix together, but do not want to dilute their own Racial Purity. Hmm, that is very interesting to think about, now that I do.
Come to think of it, I sometimes suspect that the Palestinian Arabs are the real descendants of the Ancient Israelites of the Old Testament, rather than modern day Jewry. If this is so, it would be quite a joke on the Christian Zionists. I should term them the “Christian” Zionists, for they are only Christian in name. They try too hard to Judaize their faith out of existence. This is not too good either.
#3 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 6:19 am
Perhaps, these “Christian” Zionists are actually blessing the WRONG people, and should bless the Palestinian Arabs, instead.
I am glad that I can get a chance to write all of this down. It makes me feel rather happy to do so.
Yes, tell the Christian Zionists that you suspect the Palestinian Arabs to be the True descendants of the Ancient Israelites, and that they have been worshipping the wrong people, all along. That will really get their goat, if nothing else would.
#4 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 6:40 am
Yes, and that is what we have to do. We have to point out to these “Christian” Zionists that the Palestinian Arabs are the True Descendants of the Ancient Israelites, rather than modern day Jewry. Most of modern day Jews are descendence of the Khazars, instead. We need to harp and harp upon that, too. It is the only way out of this horrid mess that we are in, today.
#5 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 7:13 am
The Jews never cared about Blacks. They only pretended to, in order to divide and conquer the Gentile populations of the world. Besides, I suspect that the Palestinians are the true descendants of the People of the Old Testament, not modern day Jews.
#6 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 10:07 am
Mexicans coming woke up blacks, not to mention harmed them in gang warfare. Blacks were like, “wait a minute! We were the oppressed here! We’re the slaves here!” Hate me all you want, but same for some Catholics carrying anti-Englishism in “de-industrialization,” where they were suddenly like “wait a minute! we’re the american worker here!”
But Irish anti-english-ism was a large force in how ameirca got here, and nobody talks about that, maybe b/c they are doing well in politics and on t.v. From Hart-Celler to Fox five, etc.
Everybody is in a different historical-dramas in their own minds–different historical paths to the country that are only projected onto the new landscape and merely played out— and always used as such.
Each gets yummy stuff when they get used. NONE have yet admitted that! A dawning day when the blacks say, ‘we were really used to get at somebody else. maybe we weren’t really the center of big, fat ‘oppression’ universe. Or wow, maybe poor dirt farmers in Alabama weren’t really the English.
Someone is always being de-something-ed. Like de-colonized, de-industrialized, de-constructed. Out with the old population, in with the new!
Different economics creates whatever people it needs, and this welfare state doesn’t need a smart white middle class.
Now they are on about killing and degrading the white boomers: fox jew-catholic show (sorry, but saying b/c truth in it, not out of personal stuff) dumping blame for the 60s on them, then talking about how much they cost, how the health care dream is going to be lost b/c of them. This is a big thing on t.v. And why should these oppressed young non-whites, (the new blacks) raised being told “tea party” (code white) would never pay for their needs when they were they most oppressed in the world, turn around and pay for dying boomers, twenty years from now, down the road?
The boomers were battered from birth to death, anyway! Now, they’re commercial (t.v.) is about doing them in quickly!
The now-older ones suppressed early memories of empty store shelves and WAR ration cards, IN REALITY, if you ask them, and memories of bomb drills in schools and such. They got a different scare-education.
But no, wn will be the first to tell you!— they were all rich spoiled brats, (and maybe this was true of 60s organizers in the cities who became “neo-cons”)–but in small towns, they were in reality people raised on bomb scares and war rations, and doing “victory garden” to eat. BECAUSE OF NO FOOD!
And yet, everybody at a place s/a SF knows they are the spoiled brats who caused the 60s now. lol.
#7 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 10:19 am
PS: The boomers are really shellshocked. Like, nothing makes sense to them. They were born on FOOD RATION and praying for victory garden to EAT and having bomb drills for school, and family traumatized from war came home and did weird post-war stress depressions, especially when they saw they won nothing for themselves but couldn’t admit it, since people would have died in vain, then meager saving for retirement, but now they are IN THE DRAMATIC ROLE of spoiled rich brats who caused the debt and were all druggies! They bump around, vaguely muttering, “we went to church. we were nice people, we tried to save a couple dollars, so we would not be a burden to our children who went to far off cities to work, (b/c we were told they really wanted to work, to go away from us, to be feminist and not have families and we wanted them to stay but sacrificed our desires to help them with what they wanted, to not be around families, and that was the hardest thing to do for them, but we did it, and now their money is gone, theirs and ours both, and we can’t even visit now with them and they say they are unhappy and divorced again and, something is wrong maybe.”
The hatred others feel for them makes no sense at all— They do not know about what the others are taught. A new “education” every ten years.
Truly, these boomers may have had it the worst!
#8 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 10:25 am
Baby Boomer is just a code word for anti-white.
#9 by seriouswon on 01/23/2011 - 10:27 am
I’m glad you’re bringing this up BGLass. I am very concerned about the divide and conquer tactics that are going on, partly because I am close in age to boomers but most importantly, the Pro-White cause cannot afford to be divided. (Careful with that Catholic vs. Protestant argument) Among other things, we need the energy and enthusiasm of our youth, as well as their ability to infiltrate various organizations. We also need our older folks. We need their memories, and we need their MONEY.
Frankly, older people don’t have more weaknesses than younger people. Younger people have just had easier access to alternate forms of media in the forms of talk radio and particularly the internet. The older set had ABC, CBS and NBC for information about politics…and very little else.
Let’s learn from the mistakes of our elders and lets glean whatever wisdom we can about our almost forgotten cultures from them…and see if we can get some donations to our cause too! 🙂
#10 by Simmons on 01/23/2011 - 10:52 am
The focus should be on the Hefner part of this post by Bob.
The Hefner cult is just that a cult with blonde props.
What Bob offered is the basic research on this cult, a totally necessary component to destroying it. But there comes a point when it is time to destroy the cult not prolong it.
Case in point, judaism, its long past time to put that cult to rest, but lo and behold the basic research has turned into a living for some and they are parasites to the parasites, actually destroying that cult at least in its current form would wreck a scratch living for a few.
Anyway give me 5 minutes and I could destroy 95% of the cults that we here have knowledge of and with whom we deal.
Without the hard shell of a PC liberalism is nothing.
#11 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 11:24 am
My point I’m trying to think about may be missed a little:
This is NOT an “catholic/prot” argument, I’m not in any argument with them— but the resistance to my even being able to talk about it says we’re not ready to wipe it clean (in order to make stronger, more genuine, real alliances.)
My point— is how it works. (I always admit being a pissed off prot, more than I actually really am, lol)
The point is: how do you identify what is going on inside people? What is being harnessed FOR USE politically? Inside you? Inside others?
Blacks got reduced completely to just one word: “slave.” That was what was usable, could piss them off, and get them to do stuff for others in politics, and they allowed that to become their only cultural signifier (oppressed, slave, programs, etc.) like on t.v.
Irish anti-Englishism is ancient, (far more volatile than I understand, not being a part of it in any living memory, so I piss people off accidently).
They are angry WITH CAUSE. For good reasons!
But in a new country, this exact history is submerged. The anger is still is in the air, though. Like, that EMOTION can be harnessed for political action in a new context (america) that articulates that past in some new way.
Eg: How some on t.v. act like we’re in ancient Rome and that’s why we should go after Muslims. That’s what’s really going on, in their heads if you listen. We are trying to save Christinaity in their minds. Some –if you watch— harness an emotion like anti-englishism, bind it up with Rome, THEN PROJECT THIS onto the American situation, seems like.
Different real experienced history, AND different fictional history (recorded history stories) rile up different populations.
Like, in trying to garner war support, you have to tap into different populations in different ways.
Nothing personal. But this seems how much deep history in people is co-opted for action. (And why shreds of history are kept alive in the public consciousness, to be used at later date).
Knowing oneself helps identify how someone else is trying to USE YOU. Once understood, the less usable you become, the less easily co-opted for someone else’s goals.
At least 150 million americans know nothing about irish-english politics. ZERO. To them, they fought english (sometimes being english themselves, sometimes not) in 1776 and that was the end of the english, (in their minds). they never thought of the english again.
They ceased to exist after that, as it was presented in the Pro-Colonist history books, and then the colonists went on with their own history about other things, never thinking of the english again. But often people just don’t get that.
Like in an individual who grew up poor. They will still carry emotions about that, and act on it, even if they are rich later.
Same with groups. This is why tea party comes in weird powdered wigs. It is time for them again. PTB say time to put on the weird wigs. (Except this time, the bank owns the interest, much worse taxation has already occurred and is inevitable, and “less taxation” will not go into the partiers pockets at all,” so the joke may be on them.
B/c many people realize that, they’re not gaining more traction, imo. NOT b/c they are “co-opted: by neo-con, but that, too.
#12 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 11:36 am
Idk, Mr. Whitaker is talking also about how people and groups perceive in accordance with their own self-interests.
Part of wiping out cultism is understanding the various ones to which you, personally, were born into—how they’re used, by whom for what.
Being born blonde, I know much about the jew-black-blonde scenario, maybe more than Hugh. It’s a cult AND personal.
#13 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 11:39 am
Baby Boomer is a code word for anti-white.
#14 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 11:46 am
The Baby Boomers were the first to be guilt tripped about the Holocaust. Somehow, the anti–Communist propaganda washed off their backs like water off that of a duck. They simply never perceived just how evil the Communists were. But, the Jews guilt tripped them about the Holocaust, ad naseum!
#15 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 11:47 am
Also, Soviet crimes are finally coming out into the light of day!
#16 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 12:31 pm
Here:
“Christian zionism” is always Protestant (previous restorationsm). Sara Palin is a Christian zionist. This is often said.
Republican Catholics, though, are often called “neo-conservative,” just like any other jewish person. (or paleo, meaning non-zionist). No new special word ever emerged for the welfare state man’s particular alliance in the system.
Neo-conservative, welfare state conservative, a rockefeller republican, and that is respectable. Maybe taxes seem like charity in their minds, and this is why they argue only over spending, like on t.v., while other groups have no interest in charity.
Whatever. They have no name. And their psychology is not on the table. Only a neo-conservative Prot is called a “zionist.” Others seem like “regan republican, or paleo.”
No one says, Catholic and Protestant zionists.
#17 by shari on 01/23/2011 - 12:33 pm
Yes, boomers wre quilt tripped about “the holocaust” and almost nothing about the communists. Yet, communist evil was on display, with the walls and machine guns to keep people in. It was ignored by boomers going to college, having families and doing what people do. Now, thank God, it’s high time to “wake out of sleep.” That hard shell of a PC is cracking.
#18 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 12:42 pm
Eventually, people will see how much the alleged Nazi Crimes resemble those of the Commies. Then, we will wonder if we have been taught to hate the wrong people for all of this time. Afterall, it was the Commies who were the most evil people in all History.
Nazism, as bad as it was, was a mere reaction to the greater evil of Soviet Communism. None seem to realize that, but me. We can eventually keep harping on Communist sins, almost as much as the Jews harp on their Holocaust.
They can cry a river, and so can we!
#19 by BGLass on 01/23/2011 - 12:42 pm
One last time:
Sean Hannity believes, by being a neo-con, he is being a good Catholic.
Sara Palin believes, by being a neo-con, she is being a “good Christian.” (Never a “good protestant.” That does not EXIST.)
THESE are two very different motivational headsets.
#20 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 12:48 pm
Well, anyhow, the Blacks have got to wake up to how they have been used, as Pawns, by the Jews, to harm White Folks. The entire strategy is based on their alliance, of convenience, with the Blacks of America. If that alliance were broken, then things will be better for us Whitefolk, in the long run.
#21 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 12:51 pm
The whole thing seems to pivot on the Neo Conservatives. If we can prove that they are merely Liberals, albeit Pro Israeli ones rather than Pro Palestinian ones, the game will be over for them forever. We just have to keep on thinking about that.
#22 by DreamboatAnnie on 01/23/2011 - 1:11 pm
What are everyone’s thoughts about somehow using the far left in a combined effort to expose Israel/Zionism? I don’t know exactly how this is done but I’ve thought about this for a while now.
Also, what about trying to pump out the message to blacks that as Latinos become more numerous and influential in politics, the less important blacks are to the left as a monolithic voting block and subsequently are not going to be viewed by Latinos as ‘important’, as do all the bed wetting white liberals.
#23 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 1:15 pm
The whole thing rests upon pointing out to them, that they would never enjoy hearing the same type of defamation used against Blacks, that they themselves routinely use against Arab Muslims. Anyone speaking of Blacks the way that the Jews speaking about Muslims, would be called a Racist. But for some reason, none who speak out against the Arab Muslims are ever termed that. Now, why is that? Why is it OK for them to badmouth Arabs but not for White Gentiles to feel anything, except love, for Black people?
#24 by DreamboatAnnie on 01/23/2011 - 1:32 pm
I don’t think appealing directly to Jews is the answer. They don’t care or empathize with anyone other than themselves.
It seems to me that the far left (who unfortunately seem to be multi-cultural zealots) are the only ones who are able to get out any legitimate anti-Zionism message to the sponge brained youth. To simply use this as a tool would be very useful despite the far left’s other idiotic rationale for whatever they think or do.
As far as ‘reaching out’ to blacks and maybe putting a bit of a scare in them, I was thinking of letting them know just how their lives will change once all the white morons who’ve been subsidizing their low IQ’s and sloth for decades are no longer able to go to bat for them.
This may be a ‘rob Peter to pay Paul’ strategy, but I’m thinking of ‘buying time’ in an effort to get some blacks to re-think their reflexive identities as democrats.
Hope I’m not rambling.
#25 by Epiphany on 01/23/2011 - 3:29 pm
There will be no Rainbow Coalition. All the nonwhites hate each other!
#26 by DreamboatAnnie on 01/23/2011 - 4:04 pm
“All the nonwhites hate each other”
Agreed, but they need to be reminded of that. There needs to be subtle and measured voices out there whispering into the collective ears of each non-white group what ‘killing whitey’ will actually achieve. It will be good for none of them.
We also need to remind Latinos that they are in fact Caucasian, the same as Anglos. It has to be a multi-faceted campaign, but it has to be free of vitriol.
The main goal is to mitigate the way Jews frame every issue. For years now Jews have been able to get away with a prolonged assault on the image of whites as the perennial devil and themselves and every other group as perennial victims. We need to start making fissures, but again, in a measured, intellectual tone.
#27 by OldBlighty on 01/23/2011 - 8:21 pm
Hi DreamboatAnnie,
Forgive me if I am making a false assumption, because I haven’t seen you post here before. But if you are new here, we already have an effective plan in motion for destroying anti-white arguments and morality, no matter what their race.
We are posting this in as many places as possible and are using it to challenge and destroy the arguments of anti-whites everywhere:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/
I know it sounds simple, but it is highly effective when we are all on a consistent message and work together.
If you want to learn about how we are using practical politics to destroy anti-whites, visit whiterabbitradio.net and listen to the mp3s, starting at number 1. I guarantee they will blow your mind.
#28 by Epiphany on 01/24/2011 - 3:38 am
Well, Jewish people would never marry any negroes, or any Goyim Race at all. That is the whole thing about them. We have to keep on at it, with that angle. Also, Blacks and Jews are beginning to percieve each other as the monsters that they really are. They are even arguing over who had it worse, the Blacks in Slavery or the Jews in the Holocaust. This, of course, is a good sign.
Anytime that our enemies fight each other, rather than us, bides us time. What they desire, of course, is a Rainbow Coalition against us. We can see if we can learn about the Jewish role in the African Slave Trade. For the Blacks’ part, they are uncovering most of it themselves. There is even a book called “Blacks and Jews: The Secret Relationship”, that I would love to one day read. The whole, anti White Coalition will fall apart, once more Blacks realize the Jewish role in their own oppression.
That would be really interesting to think about. I am glad that I have thought of it, just now. He have to see if we can convince people about how the Jews have been using Blacks, as Pawns, for their own purposes against White people. That would really be a good idea.
I can forsee a time when the Blacks and the Jews shall mostly hate each other, rather than blame all their problems on White Gentiles.
#29 by Epiphany on 01/24/2011 - 3:45 am
Well, in any event, Blacks are awakening to how they have been exploited by the Jews. This, of course, is a good sign. I should hope to see more of such signs in the future. That would be really great, too.
Eventually and inevitably, the full History of the World shall be written, not with the anti–White bias it has now, but rather with a full view of all the things that people have done to each other, over the millennia. I am glad that I can have the chance to be, who I am, at this period in World History. I really am.
Besides, much of the crimes of the Soviet Communists have been coming out on Youtube for quite a while. We Whites must familiarize ourselves on how we have been victimized by the Communist Jews, for all that period of time. It is about time that our side of the story shall come out.
I am sure that you are all with me. But first, we must learn about how the Blacks have been victimized by The Jews, during the Transatlantic Slave Trade. This could be a key component of our entire argument right there.
#30 by Epiphany on 01/24/2011 - 3:48 am
Well, in any event, things shall get a lot better, in the future. I have much hope for that, too.
#31 by Epiphany on 01/24/2011 - 5:01 am
The whole thing seems to be coming together. Blacks and Jews do not seem to like each other too much, despite their common hatred for the White Gentile population. Eventually and inevitably, a wedge can be created between those two groups, so that things would be much better for us White Gentiles. That much would be good. I am sure that things will work out well, for the better. We must keep up Morale. That is the key to it all.