A commenter discussed how a pro-white organization that tries to be mainstream discussed white traitors. They looked down from their heights and said calmly that those whites were only hurting themselves.
Damn if I look at them that way. In all of western culture there is nothing lower than a traitor. It is entertaining to look at the lengthy explanations of Dante’s Tenth Circle, the worst part of Hell which is frozen. They use all kinds of explanations like “a person who betrayed his benefactor.”
But the Tenth Circle is very simple.
It is for traitors.
Our Germanic legends tell of men who fought to the death around their dead leader’s body. If Infidel is the curse word of the Levantine world, traitor is the ultimate denunciation of ours.
In fact, the words are very similar. Levantine society is divided into religions rather than territorial nations. Every Moslem people adopts Arabic script. Yiddish is old German, but it is written in Hebrew letters.
An infidel is not just a wrong believer. The actual word means one who betrayed God.
Treason is the greatest crime any social animal can commit.
But there is a tremendous distinction to be made here that no Wordist would think of. It is a big one to us.
You see, a person may be loyal to respectability. National Review and liberals, to my mind, have only one real loyalty, and that is to their consensus. Please listen to me carefully here:
The correct term is not respectable conservative, but conservative respectable. If you truly THINK about that, you will get my point. The person is not conservative first, he is respectable first. He is not only part of the “mainstream,” the mainstream is his only real loyalty.
It is not a condemnation but a definition you need when you are offended by a pro-white taking a lackadaisical attitude toward traitors. He has a sort of Buckley attitude, that nothing is important enough to get a truly sophisticated person excited.
But this is not an act, it is true attitude, because Buckley kept insisting that he was part of the establishment, that his loyalty was with the consensus, a bit politically to the right of the consensus, but when the consensus moved so would he.
These people are respectables first. Buckley was in the conservative part of the consensus, but the moment any opinion was judged to be too far out, or too far back in time, he followed his real loyalty and not only went to the new consensus, but went to it more militantly if it were suddenly a “right-wing” extremist attitude.
So what you see here are the pro-white respectables, respectable first, pro-white as a modifier. They will only get excited when they are denouncing the Klan or some other offense to the consensus where their real loyalty lies.
To all respectables, we are infidels.
#1 by Oh Elizabeth on 01/27/2011 - 10:14 am
Buckley was Jewish, a member of the CFR and Bilderberg, etc. according to the article posted on David Duke’s website at
www davidduke.com/general/so-called-%E2%80%98conservative%E2%80%99-passes-away-but-legacy-of-ugly-deeds-survives_3553.html
I am not sure why he would even be considered pro-white in any sense of the word. He was loyal to his own. We are not his own.
#2 by Dave on 01/27/2011 - 11:02 am
This post on “Respectables” is absolutely true as regards to the underlying facts.
What are street smarts? Street smarts are having a HIGH TOLERANCE for unacceptable situations.
Most people lack street smarts and this lack has nothing to do with social class. People living in ghetto land are as lacking in street smarts as the people living in gated mansion land. How you can tell a person’s street smarts is how they react when they are tossed into an alien, uncomfortable, and threatening environment. That is when you really get to know who they are.
The primary driver for the “Respectables” is to avoid having to deal with anything uncomfortable. The “Respectable” thinks that his or her skill in avoiding alien and uncomfortable circumstances constitutes cunning. That is why the “Respectables” are always full of vanity about their “sophistication”.
I see it as weakness and I am sure this is accurate. That is why we here at BUGS have NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER feeling threatened by “Respectables”.
“Respectables” are a given in life. You can never get rid of them. But one thing you need to understand: A person with real street smarts is highly conscious of boundaries. Your high tolerance for unacceptable situations must be coupled with an unwavering respect for boundaries and when they are crossed you need to react.
And that is exactly where loyalty comes in.
A person professing loyalty is like a person professing honesty. You had better check your wallet. Loyalty is in the doing and acting. Loyalty is delivering the justice that really needs to be delivered.
The “Respectables” always think they have a get out of jail free card. That is why they never know what hit them and they are so perplexed when they are attacked.
They are the ones blubbering and wailing when a Congresswoman and a Federal judge receive bullets in their heads.
The “Repectables” have no clue how meaningful those bullets really are.
#3 by shari on 01/27/2011 - 12:41 pm
I think Jesus must have been Germanic. He never said kill all the infidels, but rather to love one another as he loved us. The liberal/respectable hijacking of this is Throw your own aside and love, adore adopt and intermarry Haitians, Somolians, Mexicans and on and on.
I despise traitors for the lives of those young and unsuspecting they have already destroyed.
#4 by BGLass on 01/27/2011 - 2:01 pm
I just hate to see uptown wn’s decimate a 15 yo wigger stuck in some 98% black school, or a 12 yo lost girl acting out a scene from a mixing-t.v.-commerical, that kind of thing. That’s just survival. Some wn’s don’t have the balls to go up against anything more than a little kid, and they’ll go on about how awful the kids are, bashing people who are already beaten to a pulp, or worse, moralize about their “plight.” Instead, they could have reached confused whites, stuck in AA and gang violence, or whatever who take it out on their own white kids at home, and that really would help save their race, which they pretend is their goal.
With liberal/respectable— they so much hate feeling unsophisticated or that everybody in the know is doing something else and they have been left way behind. You can just state to them that that is their real situation.
#5 by James C on 01/27/2011 - 10:14 pm
I’ve found Bob’s last few posts particularly illuminating.
I hadn’t really understood WHY the weakest generation had been so eager to surrender on all fronts to the anti-whites. It almost seemed as if America was suffering from some form of Divine Retribution for “making the world safe for” usury, communism and miscegenation.
It’s ironic and pathetic that the same tough guys that made Chamberlain’s “appeasement” a dirty word, have made appeasement to Political Correctness their sole mission in life.