Looking at a an exchange of comments, I agree with your conclusion that we should not use the word “revolution.”
As usual this conclusion comes from going back to the basics. What we are after seems simple, but it is taking on the entire establishment and about every government on earth: we want the disappearance of our race from the face of the earth to be seen as a legitimate topic of discussion.
Pro-whites should learrn from their mistakes. Stormfront put them out there for all to see.
So far, as we lost ground, we always mixed up our legitimate complaints with a demand for some policy. From swastikas to being unwelcome joiners of the anti-immigration movement, we have hitched out wagon to the star of the moment.
The result is that anti-whites have been able to get us off the subject of our legitimate concern by arguing about immigration or whether Hitler was better than Stalin. The actual point, our concern about he obvious disappearance of our race, is buried in standard arguments.
Take it from me, detaching our right to be concerned has been an uphill struggle. The mass audience wants the latest news about some immigration outrage or a Revisionist View of History.
But we now have BUGS and we MUST maintain the discipline BUGS is based on. No one else has it.
That discipline is demanding to DISCUSS our problem without being bullied or outlawed. Screaming fascist or Communists is what fascists and Communists do.
Now, we all know that all the respectable people insist that the only way to deal with a concern is to TALK about it. The fact is that the Mantra is so water-tight that all they can do is get off the subject by arguing specific policies or by rioting and screaming at us and outlawing us.
You have seen what the Mantra can do. They know very well that if whites look at the situation rationally, as any other race would be expected to do, the anti-whites are lost.
We are NOT advocating a policy yet. You have to be able to talk and think rationally before a policy is worked out. That is what they are openly denying us the right to do. They are doing it the same way all tyrannies do, by screaming that any discussion is subversive and dangerous and screaming labels at us.
Every time they are unfair it gives us another example. You have to get over your anger, which I have never been able to do quickly, and copy and paste it for future use.
You must READ the Mantra over and over to prepare to argue INSIDE its context. If you stick to the subject, it is all there.
#1 by OldBlighty on 02/01/2011 - 6:16 am
Are you saying those of us that want genocide tribunals, should not discuss our desire for them? I understand if that is the case. Practical politics requires discipline.
#2 by backbaygrouch on 02/01/2011 - 8:07 am
If you have any doubts about race mixing being the goal of so-called anti-racists major this article in the Sunday New York Times should dispel them. This is the media elite coming down firmly on the side of eliminating the White race. It glorifies mongrelization.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/us/30mixed.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&hp
#3 by Simmons on 02/01/2011 - 9:20 am
bbg that was “news” Should be met with one of the clauses of the Mantra. I could have read that in SF and then it would have been followed with two dozen “muds and kikes” posts. Outrage sells and SF is selling it like anyother reactionary outfit.
But N&J is also opportunity to Mantra the intended audience by adding one of the clauses of the Mantra within the initial post of no more than two sentences one of which contains a Mantra clause.
#4 by Oh Elizabeth on 02/01/2011 - 9:49 am
We have allowed the opposition to put us on the Defensive.
Our standards of fairness and decency allowed them to obtain their current positions of power.
We played by the rules.
Instead of hiding for fear of losing jobs and community standing and/or being afraid of being exterminated, we need to stand up and make it clear that we expect them to abide by the rules.
Using the Mantra is an excellent way to do it. It restates the rules of the game – fairness and decency.
Truth is a powerful position and a winning strategy. We must not allow them to make us feel weak and fearful.
Turn around and advance. Pick up the ball and calmly take the offensive position without becoming offensive. Win.
#5 by Simmons on 02/01/2011 - 10:11 am
Richard Spencer selling some N&J outrage at alt-right followed by some too long responses that belong on AmRen which we have read for 50 years to no effect. RobRoy responds in a couple of sentences.
http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/hbd-human-biodiversity/mixing-it-up/
#6 by BGLass on 02/01/2011 - 10:55 am
“When assimilation is mentioned, what is in their mind really, is a white with something else….” Even if it was only to make “family ties”/ loyalties to a hostile population, not genocide, it used to be he kings, not commoners, who had to do this. Like marriage of Euro kingdoms, French and English, or whatever, (by heads of state). This ended relationships more quickly. One divorce and it was over. Right now, no one says “elite” children should assimilate, though, only the masses.
One sees euro gentile/ jewish, or “Mexican”/ white, through the Catholic bond, that’s a little more common, and some make “political adoptions,” but this is 180 from the “celebrity” job (to provide visible example of what lower classes are to do, how they’re to act—so their real claim to fame is often being mixed, gay, etc., or at least where they sit with it).
No one follows what politicals wear anymore, the most recent exception “Lady Di,” who like president now, was more celebrity— (a projection of the sometimes unspoken unconscious of the more powerful, what they wish them to do, the contempt, etc—
Which is why, Diana’s rebellion took the visible form of a string of Paki heart surgeons and powerful Dodis. She was “down” with the people; a celebrity; they were to care about her clothes; and the natural extension came to be her rebellious assimilations, (as this is today’s slated role of white masses).
And yet no one called her a racist.
Nor would anyone mention the half brothers that might have happened, and how all that would have played out.
#7 by BGLass on 02/01/2011 - 11:53 am
Thanks— This shift from “assimilation” between European heads of state to the masses in a non-white context is interesting.
Celebrities are either paid large or knighted, since they command crowds at least as well as popes. Elton John is knighted, the football players are paid. A football player will probably not be knighted, even if American-style football existed in other countries. (The sports unique development re race would be a very good book).
#8 by Genseric on 02/01/2011 - 7:01 pm
Regarding “Revolution”:
We just aren’t there yet. And any talk of it at this point is not only premature, but will only serve to detract from the true value of the Mantra and the real work at hand. Anything that doesn’t point us in the general direction of getting our tribunals is NOT self-serving.
When it all starts to unravel, the whole world will know exactly WHAT is happening. Bugsters will be the wiser as to exactly WHO is tugging on the marionette’s strings.
Think you will be able to duck behind the curtain on this one, Whitaker? Think again.
Your people are forever in your debt. Thank you, Bob.