In my 1976 book I described the establishments that had ruled America.
The planter aristocracy ruled until 1861. There was not a single president before the Civil War who served two terms who was not a Southerner.
Then what I today call the “old establishment” took over, aka, the military industrial complex.
The planter aristocracy was destroyed utterly in a war. The old establishment became the junior of our two-headed establishment, political conservatives
The new establishment I called the education-welfare establishment. That was in charge in 1976 and is in charge now.
One Oxford professor, a Member of the Royal Society, said it was the best summary of American history he had ever read.
Even the establishment critics were amazingly complimentary. The Library Journal recommended it.
There are wild factual errors in it, but in such a complete generalization, they didn’t matter. Nobody had any trouble recognizing the outline I was describing.
Never has anything split the National Review down the middle like that book. They had a review of it entitled “Read This One,” and they had a COVER article attacking me and including Pat Buchanan and other big names, in short, my clique’s strategy to appeal to the Wallace vote.
But, as always, with all that discussion the most important thing about the book got no discussion whatsoever. Having gone through the establishments of history, I was in a position to give an outline of the next one.
It even relates to the News!
The Japanese nuclear catastrophe is being used to the max by the Windmill Crowd. Their vision of the future is a stagnant, planned world with professors, aka Intellectuals, in charge.
Our first establishment went from Jefferson and Jackson to a plain group of slavocrats. The group that overthrew them in the end was not coherent enough to have a party until 1855, when the Republicans were formed.
Even in the 1920s you would have seen no evidence of the Mommy Professor regime on the thoroughly conservative campuses that depended on big money for their survival. Then it appeared, like the Republican Party, apparently out of nowhere and was in power a few years later.
What I predicted was naturally vague, but it was an establishment formed by opposition to a planned, stagnant world. Part of the planned, stagnant world program is a militant cutting of funding for scientific research, the space program, and any new technology.
And I have said, my job today is entirely to take hints like that and develop them while everybody else is screaming at each other about the length of Gaddafi’s beard.
Seeing the next establishment is a lot like chasing tornadoes. You can clearly see a tornado condition, you can see the clouds which are likely to extend to the ground in a funnel, but you don’t know until the funnel forms. But you can’t predict a Republicans Party or a New Deal specifically,
It always comes as a complete surprise.
So your “intellectuals” and professional commentators make their living sitting and discussing the latest weather reports.
#1 by Wandrin on 04/13/2011 - 6:30 am
“it was an establishment formed by opposition to a planned, stagnant world. Part of the planned, stagnant world program is a militant cutting of funding for scientific research, the space program, and any new technology.”
Let’s hope so as seems to me the Windmill plan is pretty much a reprise of the Morgenthau plan applied to the entire White world instead of just Germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau_Plan
“converting Germany into a country primarily agricultural and pastoral in its character”
A Carthaginian solution by Green-faced stealth.
#2 by BGLass on 04/13/2011 - 9:05 am
“…the “old establishment” took over, aka, the military industrial complex….and there’s…
The new establishment I called the education-welfare establishment.
Neither creates wealth. They make justifications saying they do— like “without us, the next generation will not create wealth, and so our job is about educating for the wealth of the future!” Or they go on and on about gas prices— “without us, gas would be 15 dollars a gallon!, so you should count yourself lucky!”
The extortionist right does fear-mongering to justify its existence to the people. Or extortionist left does guilt. Then they cut each other down.
And all for a vague thing somewhere out there– the “tax payer,” the “american worker,” the “people.”
Military around here is the hardest on the “poor.” The Military “own homes!” They are not “in trouble” like the stupid poor people, especially in the “new south,” where so many of them are located.
But aren’t they are on welfare?
They do not pay taxes; they are paid BY them. From another point of view, there is no difference between them and any welfare recipient, obviously, and yet they condemn those in “programs.”
Military people go to “tea parties” and protest anti-tax.
But if they win, what will they do for a “living,” lol?
To some, just murdering for a buck, or profiteering in the old school pirate sense, or raising another generation to do it again, will always seem unenlightened, since there are so many other ways to eat.
The whole thing reminds me of Candide.
#3 by Dave on 04/13/2011 - 10:42 am
It seems trite because everybody knows it: risks can be managed, uncertainties cannot.
People lose sight of the fact that the ardent questioning that naturally rises with uncertainty is motivated by wishes that seek fulfillment. It is what people want for themselves that controls the questioning. The nature of the uncertainty doesn’t matter. Politics wouldn’t even exist if the world were constructed so that you could continually change your mind so you would not have to LIVE with what you wished and the bargains you concluded.
This is the very reason so many find themselves hopelessly in debt. Real progress means that you live in a world where increasingly you are spared from being trapped by your wishes and decisions. That is why Buckminster Fuller was right when he said that you measure technological progress simply by how much things weigh.
It is always galling to entrepreneurs and inventors how much opposition they encounter. That is because there is always a strong vested interest in keeping you trapped. That is why the tendency of the world is toward tyranny. It is why the wealthy so often and so unaccountably favor stagnation. The wealthy easily organize, trick, and manage dark skinned people who can be counted on to act like slaves. That is the real reason we have Barrack Obama as President.
The problem of elections is just something that is managed. The context for a meaningful voting franchise has long disappeared and our masters count on the general public not realizing or accurately perceiving the facts. We have been tricked out of our political rights. This trick is what Horace calls the ethnic conflict model. But here is the rub: Tyrants have no more ability to manage uncertainty than you do. Brains do trump brawn. In the end that is the way things actually work.
That is why the Establishment has got A BIG PROBLEM with the Internet. The Internet is an end run around the gatekeepers that desperately attempt to keep brains corralled.
In the past five years alone the progress that I have witnessed has been absolutely astonishing. Mommy Professor is taking an epic beating. She is so bloodied and stunned she is not even able to sober up enough even to begin to assess the situation.
This is an enormous tailwind for our side.
#4 by Simmons on 04/13/2011 - 11:59 am
Allow me to bloviate, anymore it is all just talking loudly and waving one’s arms. Basically ideology is within its own age of stagnation, it answers very little of the abstract.
IMHO it is better to know who and what they are then to bother with the arm waving loudmouth’s ideology. Take for instance our finance and monetary wizards, first I conclude that they are jewish or pseudo jewish and therfore how they are going to act is basically predetermined, status seeking, paranoia of the ever present nazis, doubling down hysteria, ruin, private plane to exile.
Mommy Prof is the culture of vanity guarded closely by censorship. When you mantra a Mommy or Mommybot you pierce the bubble of vanity more than destroy any fixed idea worth a damn.
#5 by BGLass on 04/13/2011 - 12:26 pm
Culture of vanity. That is so right. Extortion can really cloud people’s vision. Sometimes, under there, is just fear, maybe. How would they eat if they did something else? But the people for whom that was never a problem, have gotten so fleeced, that they just stop producing stuff, maybe. That’s when paranoia really seems to set in. B/c those who make the “scarce resources” better hop to it—or else!
#6 by H.Avenger on 04/13/2011 - 12:38 pm
Some White Commentators and our so-called Rulers have one thing in common. They do not see Whites ever coming together simply because of differences like Nationalism. While this is certainly true based on the past. There is an new trend that has been emerging.
I get some interesting emails. The most intriguing come from the youth. In various different places around the Western World the young whites are saying the same thing. They are not being attacked so much for being Polish, Spanish, Norwegian, Finish or any other white nationality. These days they are being attacked for being White. And in some cases when I say attacked….
I mean literally attacked. Thanks to all the non white immigration into white countries and ONLY white countries.
An opportunity is starting to appear that could reap big rewards if played correctly. Those that see the above trends will decide the future. Our Planet is full of minorities. Our race is the only group on this planet not allowed to have a spokesperson. And this is NOT allowed by those whites that say they represent us.
This anti white trend will not last forever.
Thesis: Non-White immgration into White Countries and only White countries.
Antithesis: Mantra
Synthesis: ?? You do not have to be Hegel to figure the direction this one will go.
#7 by OldBlighty on 04/14/2011 - 3:22 am
“These days they are being attacked for being White. And in some cases when I say attacked….
I mean literally attacked.”
50 years of Mommy Professor telling white people, they are responsible for all the evil in this world. And the colored people were listening as well.
Mantra or not, this was never going to end in rainbows and butterflies.
#8 by shari on 04/13/2011 - 1:55 pm
Sometimes I wish I knew some things that Bob and others seem to know because, I’m often left wondering HOW this can work,really.
Almost everybody makes their living, doing something that supports the anti-white system. So, saying, well, what about your kids, grandkids, doesn’t make a big dent, it seems. Then there are a ton of problems, requiring insurance etc.
Then I take comfort from seeing that all the evil things that have and are happening are coming to a head and will end. The mantra will be clear and those with talent, that are just playing around the edges,just won’t be able to anymore.
“Mommy professors culture of vanity” is exactly right. They give each other glowing introdutions, but you never hear anything they have actually acomplished. Sha’ Ree’ if your reading.
#9 by Dick_Whitman on 04/13/2011 - 5:03 pm
“Even in the 1920s you would have seen no evidence of the Mommy Professor regime on the thoroughly conservative campuses that depended on big money for their survival. Then it appeared, like the Republican Party, apparently out of nowhere and was in power a few years later.” (Bob)
I find Bob’s writing on historiography to be very useful. History is written by piecing together key events. A history writer would see the New Deal or the rise of the Republicans as the start of a new era.
The fact is, these events are just the most visible parts of an era that is almost impossible to truly find a beginning to.
In fact, it appears that there are no beginnings or ends in history (there are no eras)? It all just blends together. Every beginning is just part of another string of events. Reasons for events that are easily explained by modern historians would never have occurred to the people of the period being studied.
Historians often say that WWII was just the continuation of WWI. People look back and have trouble understanding why this wasn’t obvious to the people of that era.
People who listen to Horus’s Follow The White Rabbit know that WWIII may be right around the corner and that in many ways this war is also a continuation of the last one.
I expect in 70 years that people will have trouble understanding how people today didn’t see WWIII coming.
#10 by Wandrin on 04/13/2011 - 9:29 pm
“While this is certainly true based on the past. There is an new trend that has been emerging (snip) These days they are being attacked for being White.”
Identity is most often forged out of conflict and so the anti-white assault is likely to forge a new or at least modified White identity.
I think the only quibble is over, if you’re organising on the ground, whether to go through the strongest local identity people have now e.g Polish, French, Southern etc and then let the fact that the assault is specifically anti-white shape the new identity for you or jump ahead and organise on “Whiteness” from the start.
I think the answer to “Does it help initially to go through local identity?” is “Yes” and the answer to “Is it possibly a road-block later on?” is “Maybe” so there’s a practical argument there but it only really applies to people trying to create political organisations on the ground. Something like BUGS has to be at the White identity level by its nature.
#11 by Wandrin on 04/13/2011 - 9:50 pm
shari
“Sometimes I wish I knew some things that Bob and others seem to know because, I’m often left wondering HOW this can work,really.”
I think it depends on what you mean by “work.” The powers that be have brute force power and power by consent. The more consent they have the easier it is for them. If we can undermine the foundations of that consent then things will get shook up. That’s my definition of it working – getting things shook up.
The result of shaking things up might be worse – and if they have to use brute force more, then in terms of personal risk it almost certainly will be worse – but in my view that’s better than the current situation where our people are politely queuing up to take their turn in the slaughterhouse.
#12 by shari on 04/14/2011 - 8:43 am
Wandrin, I know it’s scary. But there is just nowhere to go, to make it NOT scary. I only HOPE that everything falls our way, faster than we can imagine. Too many have suffered horribly,already.