Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Another Try at “Ends and Means”

Posted by Bob on May 10th, 2011 under Coaching Session

I am very proud of the fact that our seminar members level with me.

Writing the piece called “Ends and Means” below I got right off of my original point.

So Genseric’s comment was:

“I am not afraid to say that this one went right over my head and slammed directly into the wall behind me.”

Genseric is right. I wonder what I was smoking when I let myself wander off like that.

Try to get in mind that I was once a Mommy Professor myself, and one is never fully cured.

The point of the article was supposed to be this: Anti-whites always are careful never to mix up a democratic socialist with a Communist, because a socialist may have the same GOALS as a Communist, but the MEANS he advocates make all the difference.

By contrast, anyone whose GOAL is to save the white race is routinely called a Nazi, even though our MEANS are exactly as different from Hitler’s as the British Labor Party’s were from Stalin’s.

To call someone a Communist, you must demonstrate that he advocates, or would happily countenance, the violent overthrow of the government. Further, you must demonstrate that he is in favor of a dictatorship, a “dictatorship of the proletariat” which we saw with Stalin and Lenin.

Hitler’s Brown Shirts used violence. Hitler advocated dictatorships.

I don’t. I’ve seen them and I don’t like them.

The article may have wandered off course because it occurred to me that this is not such an important difference as it was when I was coming up. Back then the Greatest Generation has just fought A War For Freedom and thereby succeeded in turning one third of the human race over to the Communists.

Back then, even honest leftists were afraid of how much farther Communism was going to go. So to a lot of people, the difference between a democratic leftist and a Communist was very, very important. So every college freshman got a set of lectures on the difference between a democratic socialist and a Communist, and you were considered unsophisticated if you confused the two.

But segregationists were unhesitatingly compared to Hitlerites.

The lesson is a bit out of date, but it is worth noting.

All socialists are not Communists, and everybody knows it. All racists are not Nazis, and that is a fact that is still worth taking note of.

  1. #1 by BGLass on 05/10/2011 - 7:50 am

    Welfare Statism, the neo-feudalism, seems in U.S., but another bottom line is those who value creativity and those who are takers/users, and whose psychology (by extension class consciousness in the Marx sense, and by extension the nations in which the users create to further their way of life) is formulated by the user goal.

    Everyone wants somebody else’s money now and can’t even understand why this could be bad. Middle class people feeding on taxes do not even understand they are essentially on “welfare” (which they may abhor) when they think exactly like anyone else on “public” monies.

    Either they’re in the ponzi-scheme rackets of money manipulation, from egregious mark-ups to futures speculatons, or redistribution positions, or fighting for the money in congress, or reproducing the system, itself, in schools, or whatever. The biggest takers and those who argue for them, like in media, are sitting pretty.

    Communist, socialist, welfare statist, neo-feudal— taker energy is pervasive, culture of users. Young people cannot even conceive that manufacturing could even be important. No future jobs exist in which they would be creating wealth, and the system they contemplate fitting into is usury not production. Driving up prices and buying cheap, screwing over others for their stuff.

    It’s the root of all the defamation. Defamation makes it so much easier to take people’s stuff. You know better than them what they’re all about, how to take care of their stuff better, etc.

    The other side of any redistribution scene is citizens extorting from other citizens, obviously. That becomes the only relationship, materially. In this, no community can exist, not really.

    Moralizing people retire on the work of poor people all around them, then condemn the poor (whose money they took) as stupid, heretics, racists, whatever.

    To an alien from another planet, why “taxpayers” are necessarily “racist” would make absolutely no sense.

  2. #2 by BGLass on 05/10/2011 - 7:55 am

    If one says, “I don’t believe in redistributing other people’s wealth” everyone agrees (this is stealing). But then, if one points out that the person agreeing is, in fact, living on others productivity, and often productivity not freely given (extortion), it is impolite.

  3. #3 by James C on 05/10/2011 - 9:58 am

    Honestly the only thing people of my generation has ever heard about Communists is in relation to mean old Senator McCarthy and how he unjustly witchhunt-hysteria-scapegoat something or other.

    I doubt if kids today have even HEARD of the Soviet Union. The only thing the “education” system actually tries to teach is White Guilt, so the only thing kids learn are “stole indians land, enslaved Africans, naziskilledsixmillionjews, civil rights and St. Martin Luther of the King”. They’ve LITERALLY never heard anything else.

  4. #4 by Dave on 05/10/2011 - 11:32 am

    In the Church of Cosmic Universalism (every mainstream religion and ideology today) there is no race but only the “human family”. The Church of Cosmic Universalism always makes its appeals on behalf of conscience.

    If you don’t buy in, you are by definition evil. Accordingly, the specific goal of preserving the white race is evil according to the Church of Cosmic Universalism.

    But let’s be accurate here. The Church of Cosmic Universalism does not condemn the goal of preserving the white race per se. It simply asserts that such a goal is a ruse for white supremacy and inequality.

    That is what we are really fighting, the accusation that we are engaged in a ruse by stating that our goal is the preservation of the white race.

    This is formable stuff to confront and we must not use Mommy Professor’s methods to defend ourselves. Our advantage is in what our enemies are causing the world to become. The Church of Cosmic Universalism is entirely blind to its destructiveness. In that, new worlds are born.

  5. #5 by Creator on 05/10/2011 - 4:30 pm

    “All for one and one for all” bellowed the 3 Musketeers.
    The anti-Whites twisted it a bit to “All for one and one controls all”
    Sick buggers….. 🙂

  6. #6 by Genseric on 05/10/2011 - 5:38 pm

    Thanks for breaking that play down for me Barney Style (retarded purple dinosaur reference), coach! However, I don’t think it was anything you wrote that confused me. Rather, my ability to focus and stay on task isn’t always so great.

    Sometimes, try as I might, I just can’t envision all the X’s and O’s involved. Although, I am trying.

    Thank you!

You must be logged in to post a comment.