Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The National Review “DUHH!”

Posted by Bob on June 1st, 2011 under Coaching Session


“The point is not whether the dog plays chess well, but that the dog can play chess at all.”

So when a tenured professor at Emory had to resign because he had made up his facts to prove that early Americans had very few guns it was no scandal.

What is more important, every single respectable conservative commentator insisted that this one example was unique. Every single respectable conservative insisted that all the OTHER Politically Correct professors were scrupulously honest.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, Politically Correct fraud is so well protected that it is amazing that we ever catch anybody at it. The head of the professors’ association is an open Marxist, and he states openly that truth is a POLITICAL matter.

How, exactly is that different from a Medieval Pope dictating scientific truth because it is a RELIGIOUS matter.

It means the same thing.

EXACTLY the same thing.

Under the popes, religious truth was declared by the pope. Under Marxism, political truth is dictated by the dictatorship of the proletariat.

The head of America’s organization of professors, whose only product is supposed to be truth, paid for by public money, states flatly that truth is whatever he decides SHOULD be true.

It would be amazing if what respectable conservatives all say were true.

When a group of people states flatly that truth is whatever their politics say, it is not amazing that a few professors get caught on global warming or guns, but that any professor ever gets caught at all.

Respectable conservatives earn their pay. But they can only earn their pay until people stop just disagreeing with them and start laughing at them.

They earn their pay by claiming an objectivity for professors that professors do not claim for themselves.

Conservatives insist that professors are objective.

Politically Correct professors claim no such thing.

Anyone who knows anything about Marxism recognizes the term “politically correct.” It is and always has been an entirely Marxist term.

The conservative Bubbah says, “Gorsh, I didn’t know that! You must thin I is ignernt.”

And for once, the conservative Bubbah is right.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by BGLass on 06/01/2011 - 7:49 am

    Average joes are afraid to laugh, maybe, b/c there’s already 20% unemployment and most of the public lives on a ponzi scheme. If they call these naked emperors out by just cracking up, then wth?— it’ll be 100%. What would those people even DO. This thought is scary.

    They see t.v. boiling down to leftover commies doing hackneyed PC Religion schtick, then jewish ambition for Israel, then jesuit-incited “liberation theology” proxies being tax-catapulted over south border to romanize the u.s. For each of these Religionists, whether pc, or jews or catholics, theologically, the u.s. always posed an unanswerable question that is faith/identity destroying for each: If we are so blessed (we are the grand liberator of oppressed, or the grand one chosen-by-god, or theee keeper of the only real christianity), then why on earth did god bless the these americans who are just big fat stupid heretic, goy, oppressors???

    Religiously, any “American” success causes an extreme crisis of faith for each.

    It’s extremely important that the u.s. never be identified as a “protestant” nation for this reason, (even worse than i.d. as a white nation) nor connections made regarding explicitly protestant nature of the constitution, etc., that ‘mainline’ protestantism be named as ‘over forever,’ (despite obvious longevity of such heretics under many names).

    Identity politics involves harnessing this fury (the greatest fury that can be created in people, maybe) when the core of themselves is questioned. tapping that is how they “freak” and become an explosive mob.

    At the heart of each religion, is the sense that they are the one, the best, the only, the greatest, etc. Truly perceiving evidence to the contrary creates the internal crisis.

    So, whatever religion, everything must prove their peculiar self-concept. do this, and our god will love you the most.

    • #2 by James C on 06/01/2011 - 8:28 am

      One of the core doctrines of Political Correctness is Human Equality.

      I think that’s the reason the faithful are always so adamant about our genocide. We’re obviously not equal, PAINFULLY obvious it would seem.

      Why else would they call us “white supremacists” for simply wanting to exist?

      Nothing unsettles a religious fanatic more than proof that his religion is bunk.

  2. #3 by Genseric on 06/01/2011 - 7:52 am

    “The point is not whether the dog plays chess well, but that the dog can play chess at all.”

    I read this and immediately began laughing uncontrollably.

    Under the popes, religious truth was declared by the pope. Under Marxism, political truth is dictated by the dictatorship of the proletariat.

    You’re right, Bob. It is precisely the same thing, both Popes and Marxists alike DENY themselves – more importantly others – the same thing. We call that ‘thing’ simple truth. And Conservative Respectables prefer to just LIE about it all. Either that or their personal handicap prevents them from seeing these things, one or the other.

    “Conservatives insist that professors are objective.

    Politically Correct professors claim no such thing.”

    Conservatives insist that professors are objective. = Projection of their World view onto others.

    Politically Correct professors claim no such thing. = Projection of their World view onto others.

    What is hard to look past in these two simple truths is the tendency of two political factions to project/inject their own perception onto/into the mainstream. Conservatives have a tendency to WANT everyone to remain objective because they value that as ‘righteous’ and ‘good.’. Liberals want everyone to BELIEVE (have faith) in them and their Truth. For it is They who Truly possess the ‘Magic Finger.’

    What it all boils down to is: Truth-telling is a nasty business. More often than not, someone’s feelings end up getting hurt. And people make NATURAL enemies by doing so. This is why it is SO unpopular. Truth-telling is WHY people like Ron Paul never get elected President.

    On a daily mission to scour millions of Google pages for simple truth,
    Genseric

  3. #4 by BGLass on 06/01/2011 - 8:21 am

    The constant projection of their own realities is miles away from real sophistication of noticing real qualities in the real world. Blathering on in a funhouse hall of mirrors, gazing at their own reflections. They are lost in the funhouse. how could anyone take such a person seriously?

    • #5 by Genseric on 06/01/2011 - 10:53 pm

      Right. Well, they take them seriously because their loyalty is to Money. They worship it. They are willing to get (take) it by any means necessary. If that means they have to turn a blind eye to the Genocide of Europeans and European Americans, then so be it. Conservatives and Liberals, as you have pointed out numerous times before, simply disagree on the preferred program designed to obtain (steal) it.

      To DENY thy self a simple truth as SIMPLE as ‘Race is real and it matters’ defies all logic, sensibility, and Common Sense.

      But hey, as Bob likes to say, “It pays.”

      “At the heart of each religion, is the sense that they are the one, the best, the only, the greatest, etc. Truly perceiving evidence to the contrary creates the internal crisis.”

      What you say here BGL strikes at the very epicenter of the heart of my argument,

      What is the clinical term for this? Cognitive dissonance? Thank Odin for The Mantra.

      My loyalty is to my God-Nation-Family,
      Genseric

You must be logged in to post a comment.